Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Home Office Ordered to amend policy limiting assistance for trafficking victims

In January, the government implemented new rules that limited protection and support for victims of modern slavery

Home Office Ordered to amend policy limiting assistance for trafficking victims

The Home Office has been directed by a high court judge to make changes to a recently introduced trafficking policy that restricts help for trafficking victims.

The urgent hearing took place on Wednesday (26), where lawyers representing trafficking victims argued that the policy could expose them to human rights violations, including slavery and forced labour, The Guardian reported.


In January, the government implemented new rules that limited protection and support for victims of modern slavery.

One of the changes was that potential trafficking victims with criminal convictions would no longer be automatically assessed for the support available to trafficking victims, such as accommodation, counselling, and financial assistance.

Human rights and anti-trafficking advocates raised concerns that this exclusion could push victims back into the hands of their traffickers, including those forced into criminal activities like cultivating cannabis or engaging in sex work.

The policy, known as public order disqualification (POD), faced challenges in court by three potential trafficking victims who had received PODs due to criminal convictions.

During the case, it was revealed that out of 253 decisions made about this group of trafficking victims since the policy's implementation, 252 were rejected for support, leaving 131 people still awaiting a decision.

Representing the trafficking victims, Chris Buttler KC argued that the new policy violated human rights laws, including the prohibition against slavery.

Justice Swift granted a court order mandating that all potential trafficking victims must be assessed before any order disqualifying them from support is made, providing practical safeguards against potential human rights breaches.

A further hearing to assess the legality of the policy is scheduled for the end of October.

Maria Thomas of Duncan Lewis solicitors, who represented the claimants, welcomed the high court order, stating that it would offer increased protection to trafficking victims, including British youngsters exploited by county lines gangs and victims of forced prostitution. She called on the home secretary to review the policy.

The high court order issued on Wednesday faced opposition from the home secretary's legal team and comes after a previous high court challenge to another aspect of the new trafficking policy.

During that challenge, the home secretary reversed course on the type of evidence required from people to demonstrate that they have been trafficked.

A Home Office spokesperson said that the government is actively working with international and domestic partners to combat human trafficking and will respond to the court's findings in due course.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Milo Yiannopoulos may be coming back to Britain: But what kind of country is he returning to?

British far-right political pundit Milo Yiannopoulos hosts the ‘Bishops Enough Is Enough’ rally at the MECU Pavilion November 16, 2021 in Baltimore, Maryland. Organized to coincide and run counter to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops at the nearby Marriott Baltimore Waterfront, the conservative prayer meeting and convention was organized by the far-right Catholic news outlet Saint Michael’s Media, also known as Church Militant.

Milo Yiannopoulos may be coming back to Britain: But what kind of country is he returning to?

Milo Yiannopoulos built his name in America. Now America may be sending him back to Britain.

The British commentator, 41, is being held by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement after authorities said he overstayed his immigration status and failed to attend an immigration hearing. An immigration judge issued a final order of removal on July 22, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

Keep ReadingShow less