Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Historians challenge home office over citizenship lesson

By Amit Roy

AS WE have seen with Dr David Starkey, not everyone agrees with his version of history – certainly not his history of slavery.


The Home Office’s version of his­tory is also being challenged by 181 historians, many of them eminent, at the last count. Applicants for citi­zenship or settlement (“indefinite leave to remain”) in the country have to pass the Home Office’s “Life in the UK Test”, which includes a section on the history of Britain.

But in History, the official journal of the Historical Association, a let­ter signed by the historians has taken issue with the Home Office’s version of decolonisation and with Britain’s alleged non-involvement in slavery.

“We are historians of Britain and the British Empire and writing in protest at the on-going misrepre­sentation of slavery and Empire in the Life in the UK Test,” the letter says.

“The official handbook pub­lished by the Home Office is funda­mentally misleading and in places, demonstrably false.”

“The official handbook creates a distorted view of the British past.”

The Home Office version of de­colonisation is false, the historians’ letter points out.

“It also states that ‘by the second part of the 20th century, there was, for the most part, an orderly transi­tion from Empire to Common­wealth, with countries being grant­ed their independence’ (p 51).

“In fact, decolonisation was not an ‘orderly’ but an often violent process, not only in India but also in the many so-called ‘emergencies’ such as the Mau-Mau Uprising in Kenya (1952-1960). We call for an immediate official review of the his­tory chapter.

“People in the colonies and peo­ple of colour in the UK are nowhere actors in this official history. The handbook promotes the misleading view that the Empire came to an end simply because the British de­cided it was the right thing to do.

“Similarly, the abolition of slav­ery is treated as a British achieve­ment, in which enslaved people themselves played no part. The book is equally silent about colonial protests, uprisings and independ­ence movements.”

The letter objects to the Home Office line on slavery: “For example, it states that ‘while slavery was ille­gal within Britain itself, by the 18th century it was a fully established overseas industry’ (p 42). In fact, whether slavery was legal or illegal within Britain was a matter of de­bate in the 18th century, and many people were held as slaves. The handbook is full of dates and num­bers but does not give the number of people transported as slaves on British ships (over three million); nor does it mention that any of them died.”

It goes on: “Applicants are ex­pected to learn about more than 200 individuals. The only individual of colonial origin named in the book is Sake Dean Mohamet, who co-founded England’s first curry house in 1810. The pages on the British Empire end with a celebra­tion of Rudyard Kipling.”

Personally, I love Kipling’s The Jungle Book but his views on empire were of his time.

The Home Office should do an experiment and find out how many British people, born and brought up in Britain, pass its Life in the UK Test. Not many, I suspect. It would be best to scrap the whole test, not just the history section, and think of a better way of judging the suitabil­ity of applicants.

By the way, it would be interest­ing to know which historians were responsible for writing the Home Office’s history section.

More For You

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less
If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

Portraits of Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists, killed in Israel’s last Friday (13) attack, are seen above a road, as heavy smoke rises from an oil refinery in southern Teheran hit in an overnight Israeli strike last Sunday (15)

If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

THERE is one question to which none of us has the answer: if the ayatollahs are toppled, who will take over in Teheran?

I am surprised that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has lasted as long as he has. He is 86, and would achieve immortality as a “martyr” in the eyes of regime supporters if the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, succeeded in assassinating him. This was apparently Netanyahu’s plan, though he was apparently dissuaded by US president Donald Trump from going ahead with the killing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

A woman poses with a sign as members of the public queue to enter a council meeting during a protest calling for justice for victims of sexual abuse and grooming gangs, outside the council offices at City Centre on January 20, 2025 in Oldham, England

Getty Images

Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

WAS a national inquiry needed into so-called grooming gangs? Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer did not think so in January, but now accepts Dame Louise Casey’s recommendation to commission one.

The previous Conservative government – having held a seven-year national inquiry into child sexual abuse – started loudly championing a new national inquiry once it lost the power to call one. Casey explains why she changed her mind too after her four-month, rapid audit into actions taken and missed on group-based exploitation and abuse. A headline Casey theme is the ‘shying away’ from race.

Keep ReadingShow less