Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Grenfell Tower: Council failing in duty of care to residents, says Labour MP

HUNDREDS of residents displaced by the Grenfell Tower fire that killed about 80 people in in June are still living in hotels or friends' houses because of a failure by local authorities to rehouse them, the Labour MP representing the London borough said on Monday (13).

The 24-storey social housing block in the wealthy borough of Kensington and Chelsea was destroyed on June 14 in a blaze that left hundreds bereaved and homeless.


A criminal investigation is under way into the causes of the fire, while a separate public inquiry is also going on to establish whether there were failures in planning, construction, maintenance or other aspects of the tower's history.

"The council and the government are failing in their duty of care to Grenfell survivors, evacuees and near neighbours every day," said Labour MP Emma Dent Coad, who represents Kensington.

In a report on housing and inequality in the borough, she wrote that most children displaced by the fire were still in emergency accommodation five months later even though it was unlawful to keep them in such accommodation for longer than six weeks.

The Conservative-run local authority, Kensington and Chelsea Council, denied that the slow pace of re-housing people was due to any failure on its part. A spokesman said the process was tailored to the bereaved and going at their own pace.

Of the 206 households from the tower itself and from nearby Grenfell Walk who needed new homes, 28 have moved into permanent homes while 49 have moved into temporary ones, the council said.

It said a total of 178 children were still in emergency accommodation, including living with friends, in hotels or in serviced apartments.

Dent Coad dismissed the suggestion that any of the families were still in emergency accommodation out of choice. She said she had visited many families and they were all desperate to move into a permanent home. The problem, she said, was that they were not being offered suitable homes.

"A lot of people are losing their minds," Dent Coad said, describing visits to families in cramped hotel rooms where children had nowhere to do their homework and parents broke down in tears when they talked about their situation.

(Reuters)

More For You

HS2 
review blames 'gold plating' of high speed plans for £100 bn cost

The main contract was given out before designs were ready, with poor planning for managing risks

Getty Images

HS2 review blames 'gold plating' of high speed plans for £100 bn cost

Highlights

  • Original plan for 360km/h speeds created bespoke design that inflated costs beyond control.
  • First trains between London and Birmingham now expected from 2035, not 2033.
  • Project cost has soared from £32.7 bn in 2011 to potential £100 bn for reduced route.
An official government review has found that trying to build one of the world's fastest railways through "gold plating" drove costs for Britain's high-speed rail project out of control.

Stephen Lovegrove, former national security adviser, told The Times that trying to build one of the world's fastest railways was a major mistake that caused HS2's problems from the start.

The decision to design tracks for speeds of 360km/h forced engineers to create highly specialised infrastructure that made costs spiral out of control.

Keep ReadingShow less