Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Reeves rejects claims she misled voters before budget

On Friday, the head of Britain’s budget watchdog said in a letter that earlier forecasts sent to the government showed the productivity downgrade was offset by higher real wages and inflation, information which Reeves did not include in her speech.

Reeves

Reeves had given a speech on November 4, where she referred to a “weaker than previously thought” productivity performance.

Getty Images

CHANCELLOR Rachel Reeves on Sunday said she did not mislead the public over official forecasts ahead of this month’s budget, stating she had been clear about the need to increase the fiscal buffer.

Reeves had given a speech on November 4, where she referred to a “weaker than previously thought” productivity performance. The remarks were seen as setting the stage to potentially move away from Labour’s pre-2024 election commitment not to raise income tax rates.


On Friday, the head of Britain’s budget watchdog said in a letter that earlier forecasts sent to the government showed the productivity downgrade was offset by higher real wages and inflation, information which Reeves did not include in her speech.

The Office for Budget Responsibility’s confidential forecasts, provided to Reeves before her November 4 remarks, showed she would meet her fiscal rules with a margin of 4.2 billion pounds, excluding any budget decisions or the reversal of welfare cuts made earlier in the year.

Reeves told Sky News on Sunday that increasing that buffer was her focus, saying the surplus was too small by historical standards and that she wanted to give the Bank of England room to keep cutting interest rates.

“The just over 4 billion pounds surplus was not enough,” she said. “The headroom would not have been enough, and it would not give the Bank of England space to continue to cut interest rates.”

When she presented the budget on Wednesday, Reeves had expanded her headroom against the fiscal rules to 21.7 billion pounds, up from 9.9 billion pounds in her earlier fiscal plan.

The Conservative Party has said Reeves should resign for misleading the public about the economic situation before the November 26 budget.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

british-steel-iStock

British Steel’s Scunthorpe site remains at the centre of the government’s effort to preserve UK steelmaking

Photo: iStock

How long can taxpayers keep British Steel afloat without a long-term plan?

  • British Steel is costing taxpayers about £1.3 million a day, according to the Public Accounts Committee.
  • The government had provided £555 million in funding by June, while spending was expected to reach £642 million by the end of June.
  • MPs say there is still no credible plan for the company’s long-term business model, decarbonisation or finances.

Britain’s decision to rescue British Steel was meant to buy time. More than a year later, MPs are asking what that time has actually bought.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has warned that the government still has no credible plan for how the publicly owned steelmaker will become financially sustainable, while taxpayers continue to spend about £1.3 million a day keeping it going.

Keep ReadingShow less