Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Good and bad protests

By Amit Roy

WESTERN gov­ernments and the media have backed protests in the Belarus capital, Minsk, against president Alex­ander Lu­kashenko, who is widely accused of rig­ging his election victory in early August.


But this moral sup­port might prove point­less unless the west is able to match president Vladimir Putin’s threat to send in military help from Russia.

It is worth remember­ing the lessons from the Arab Spring of the early 2010s when the demo­cratic process went into reverse in Egypt, Syria, Iraq and elsewhere, de­spite western support for the protestors’ cause.

Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter marches in Portland, Oregon, are being judged by differ­ent standards, with the protestors denounced as “agitators and thugs” by US president Trump. Joe Biden, the Demo­cratic presidential can­didate who fears the law and order issue is being used against him, has also condemned the vi­olence, though he accused Trump of “fanning the flames of hate and division in our society” and “recklessly encour­aging violence”.

Ironically, Putin said of the Belarus protests: “If this fight for natural rights, legal rights, turns into mayhem and riot­ing, I see nothing good for the country. We have never supported this.”

In other words, one man’s good protest is another man’s thuggery.

More For You

Reeves tax plan

Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves

Reeves faces calls to resign over tax plan

IF ONLY voters had listened to Rishi Sunak last year, the economy would today have been in a much healthier state. Inflation was about two per cent when he was oust­ed from office. As chancellor, Rachel Reeves has managed to double that.

The Daily Telegraph wants Reeves to re­sign, allegedly because she misled the coun­try. She claimed the economy faced a black hole of £20–30 billion, but it has now emerged that Richard Hughes, chair of the indepen­dent Office for Budget Responsibility, told Reeves that “at no point” she faced a shortfall of more than £2.5bn. Hughes also confirmed that on October 31, the OBR upgraded its forecasts and told the chancellor that she, in fact, had a £4.2bn surplus. In other words, she stands accused of lying in order to justify her decision to raise taxes by £26bn.

Keep ReadingShow less