Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Former Indian cricketer Irfan Pathan responds to Pakistan PM's '152/0 Vs 170/0' tweet on India

England thrashed India by 10 wickets to set up summit clash with Pakistan on Thursday (10).

Former Indian cricketer Irfan Pathan responds to Pakistan PM's '152/0 Vs 170/0' tweet on India

Former Indian cricketer Irfan Pathan responded to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, after he took a dig at the Indian cricket team following their 10-wicket loss to England in the semifinal of the ICC T20 World Cup on Thursday (November 10).

Pathan took Twitter to reply to Sharif’s tweet, saying the difference between us is that we are happy with ourselves, you look for happiness when others are in trouble.


“Aap mein or hum mein fark yehi hai. Hum apni khushi se khush or aap dusre ke taklif se. Is liye khud ke mulk ko behtar karne pe dhyan nahi hai. (This is the difference between you and us. We are happy with our happiness and you are happy with other's problems. That's why there is no focus on improving one's own country.”, Pathan replied to Sharif’s tweet.

“So, this Sunday, it’s 152/0 vs 170/0,” Sharif said in a tweet after India’s loss to England in the semi-final.

Put to bat first by England, India posted 168/6 in their 20 overs. Hardik Pandya (63 off 33 balls) and Virat Kohli (50 off 40 balls) were the stars for Men in Blue with the bat. They put on a crucial stand of 61-runs for the fourth wicket.

However, chasing 169, England put pressure on Indian bowlers right from the first over. India did not have any answer for the onslaught brought by Jos Buttler (80*) and Alex Hales (86*). England chased the total with all ten wickets in hand with four overs to spare.

(With inputs from Agencies)

More For You

Insurer ordered to pay couple after gold theft dispute

Insurer tried to claim that gold and silver stolen from their home was not covered by their policy (Photo for representation: iStock)

Insurer ordered to pay couple after gold theft dispute

A BRITISH couple have won an insurance dispute after their provider refused to pay compensation for stolen gold and silver, arguing that the items counted as fine art rather than personal belongings.

According to The Times, the couple, identified only as Mr and Mrs L, were victims of a burglary in which a gold bar and a block of silver were taken from their home, along with other possessions.

Keep ReadingShow less