Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

'Forced adoption': what does the law say?

The UK parliament passed the Children Act 1989, which made the child’s welfare the paramount consideration.

'Forced adoption': what does the law say?

Thousands of parents in Britain have had their children removed and adopted without their consent since the turn of the century -- many more than in any of its European neighbours.

This is largely due to the UK legal system's focus on the well-being of the child, and the requirement only to convince a judge that a child may be at risk of future harm.


Here is the legal situation in England and Wales. Scotland, which has its separate legal system, is broadly similar.

Child's welfare 

Adoption was historically focused on meeting the needs of adults rather than children and it was not until 1976 that it became part of the wider child protection system, allowing courts to dispense with parental consent.

The UK parliament passed the Children Act 1989, which made the child's welfare the paramount consideration.

Judge Brenda Hale stated at the time that "there is no question of a parental right" while politician John Kerr explained it "is only as a contributor to the child's welfare that parenthood assumes any significance".

Threshold 

A child can only be removed from his or her family with the authorisation of the family court if it is satisfied that the child is "suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm" due to parental action.

Harm is defined as meaning "ill-treatment or the impairment of health or development, including, for example, impairment suffered from seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another".

Hale stressed the state "does not and cannot take away the children of all the people who commit crimes, who abuse alcohol and drugs, who suffer from physical and mental illnesses or who espouse anti-social political or religious beliefs".

But campaigners complain that the rules are ultimately subjective and that the "crystal ball" method can lead to children being removed from mothers on the grounds that they have mental health issues or are victims of domestic abuse.

Adoption

A child may only be placed for adoption either with the parents' consent or where the court makes a "placement order", authorising the local authority to place a child for adoption.

If the parent has not consented to the placement, the court must be satisfied that parental consent should be dispensed with.

Once the child is the subject of a placement order, parental responsibility is given to the local authority.

After the placement order, the child will be placed with prospective adopters pending a final adoption order.

While it is possible to overturn an adoption order, in reality, it only occurs in highly exceptional circumstances.

Contact

When a child is in the care of the local authority, parents must be allowed reasonable contact with the child.

Once placed for adoption, any contact will be ended.

EU system 

The English adoption system has caused tension between the government and several European Union member states, in particular Latvia, Slovakia and Bulgaria.

Latvia's parliament formally complained to the House of Commons that children of Latvian descent were being adopted by British families, without parental consent.

In one case, the embassy of Bulgaria observed in a non-participatory capacity and suggested several options for the alternative care of a Bulgarian child, rather than her adoption in England.

And several hundred protesters gathered outside the British embassy in Bratislava in 2012 in protest over Slovak children adopted in Britain.

Every country in Europe has a mechanism for permitting adoption without parental consent, in certain circumstances, but "few –- if any –- States exercise this power to the extent to which the English courts do," according to an EU report on the issue.

(AFP)

More For You

Revd Arun Arora

Revd Arun Arora

Asian bishop appeals for racial harmony after far-right protests

AN ASIAN Church of England bishop has used a sermon in northern England to appeal for racial harmony, urging his congregation to reclaim the country’s St George’s flag and the Christian faith from divisive forces.

Right Reverend Arun Arora, Bishop of Kirkstall, was addressing a service on Wednesday (17) evening in east Leeds, near the Britannia Hotel – the site of regular protests against asylum seekers being housed there.

Keep ReadingShow less
Starmer

Keir Starmer speaks at a press conference at Chequers, near Aylesbury, Britain, September 18, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Starmer secures small win as second migrant returned to France

A SECOND flight deporting a migrant from the UK to France took off on Friday (19), after he lost a legal challenge to stay his return, the Home Office said.

The deportee was believed to be an Eritrean man whose removal got the green light after he lost an 11th-hour legal challenge in the High Court on Thursday (18) night.

Keep ReadingShow less
Air India crash victims

FILE PHOTO: Mourners carry the coffins of victims who died in the Air India Flight 171 crash, for funeral ceremony in Ahmedabad on June 21, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)

Getty Images

Families of Air India crash victims sue Boeing in US court

FAMILIES of four passengers who died in the Air India crash in June have filed a lawsuit in a US court against Boeing and Honeywell International, alleging that a faulty fuel cut-off switch caused the disaster.

The case, filed in Delaware Superior Court by The Lanier Law Firm, seeks compensatory and punitive damages for the wrongful deaths of four passengers on flight AI171.

Keep ReadingShow less
BAPS welcomes US decision to end exploitation inquiry

Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey

X/@bapsrbv

BAPS welcomes US decision to end exploitation inquiry

BAPS has welcomed the decision of the US Justice Department to close its investigation into alleged worker exploitation during the construction of its Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey.

The inquiry began in 2021 after a group of Indian workers filed a lawsuit in the District Court of New Jersey. They accused the organisation of human trafficking and wage violations, claiming they had been paid as little as $1 a day while building the vast temple complex.

Keep ReadingShow less
Starmer-Getty

Keir Starmer

Getty Images

Starmer condemns far-right  violence

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer has vowed that Britain will not allow people to feel unsafe “because of their background or the colour of their skin” after violent clashes erupted at one of the largest far-right rallies the country has ever seen.

Speaking last Sunday (14), a day after the “Unite the Kingdom” march led by activist Tommy Robinson, Starmer condemned the violence against police officers and rejected attempts to use national flags as symbols of division.

Keep ReadingShow less