SENIOR south Asian doctors have accused the government of failing to protect the most vulnerable frontline health workers.
Their comments came during an end-of-year virtual roundtable on the government’s handling of the pandemic.
Board members of the British Medical Association (BMA), the doctors’ union, told Eastern Eye, that they and some of their south Asian colleagues had yet to be vaccinated for the virus.
“I really think that it would be a dereliction of duty if doctors and other healthcare workers who are at highest risk are left delayed in not receiving the protection they need through being vaccinated,” said the BMA chair, Dr Chaand Nagpaul.
“What I and others are doing is putting real pressure on those system leaders in our local areas and government that they have to prioritise the doctors who are most at risk of this virus and other health care workers.”
According to government data, the Covid virus disproportionately affects black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) groups.
Dr Farah Jameel, a north London GP and member of the BMA’s general practitioners committee, described the government’s approach as “shambolic”.
“I have not seen enough studies which suggest what is it about being BAME that makes me more at risk of developing a significant illness when I do contract Covid and being at a higher risk of things like mortality.
“They (the government) acknowledge that BAME individuals are at a higher risk, but then they do not acknowledge or explain why they haven’t put us at that front of the queue. And I think I’d want to be asking questions about that.”
Chair of the BMA staff, associate specialist and specialty doctors committee, Dr Amit Kochhar, said lessons from earlier lockdowns had not been learned.
He had not been vaccinated when he spoke to Eastern Eye, despite being in a high-risk group.
“I don’t know why there is a failure to recognise that these groups, and it needs looking at, because we have been through so much,” said the ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeon from Lancashire. “I personally knew five of the first 10 doctors who died, and to speak to their families was heart breaking. It is not only a loss of an NHS worker, it is a loss to the whole NHS and a loss to that family forever.”
South Asian doctors felt undervalued by the government, according to the panellists.
“You also know that some of us have beards. One of the consultants who died in the Midlands was a Sikh doctor. You can’t have PPE (personal protective equipment) that doesn’t fit the beard appropriately, so you need other measures,” Dr Kochhar said.
“These have to be arranged if you value that doctor’s life and that doctor’s contribution, and sometimes it does feel as though we were not valued. When the vaccines prioritisation list is being drawn up, where are the BAME doctors? Where are the BAME staff? They haven’t been prioritised as yet, not to my knowledge.”
Throughout 2020, the BMA chair wrote to the government pointing out that health workers were dying unnecessarily because of a lack of protection.
More needed to done to protect the most vulnerable groups, Dr Kochhar said.
In the past month, Dr Nagpaul wrote to the head of the NHS, Sir Simon Stevens, asking him to look into the arrangements.
The first letter was sent just before Christmas (December 21), followed by a second letter on December 29, reinforcing the message that 90 per cent of doctors who died were BAME.
He blamed the lack of a “systematic approach” in dealing with the pandemic for GPs and hospitals forced to do “their own work to try and protect their most vulnerable healthcare workers”.
That is still happening today, Dr Nagpaul said, when it comes to vaccinating patients in his own surgery. He told Eastern Eye that 40 per cent were BAME and most of these were south Asian.
“We had 1,000 vaccines for over 80s, and there are 10,000 over 80s in our population. We prioritised the first 1,000 to those who were over 80 and were from a BAME status and who had other medical conditions, such as diabetes.
“So, in fact we prioritised from a commitment we had to our community to protect those who are the most vulnerable and those have been largely BAME patients.”
What annoyed south Asian doctors was the government’s inconsistent messaging in recognising that BAME people were disproportionately more likely to not only contract Covid, but also die from it.
They point to the contradiction between two government reports.
The Public Health England review in June said that racism and inequality could have been increased risk factors for BAME communities. Yet in October, the race disparity unit’s quarterly report did not once mention racism as a factor.
Later, during a briefing, a government adviser ruled out structural racism being a feature.
“I find it extraordinary that the government can, at a stroke, ignore that the recommendations from an esteemed body of specialists who looked at this, which said there was structural racism, and to just ignore it and say that now suddenly it doesn’t exist; well, of course, it exists,” said the BMA chair.
“There are clear structural aspects of our health service that have resulted in unequal treatment, unequal experience for some of our healthcare workers, who are from a BAME background – the evidence is clear cut.
“So, I don’t quite understand how the government can ignore the recommendations and simply talk about another report from the race disparity unit in October.”
Another concern for south Asian doctors is a culture of fear among BAME health workers in the NHS.
According to the BMA, survey after survey reveals the lack of confidence to complain about systemic unfairness.
“BAME doctors have reported between two to three times as much as their white counterparts feeling under pressure to see patients without protection.
“They have reported to us feeling less able to raise concerns in their workplace to go to their managers to say, ‘I feel worried about whatever it might be during the Covid pandemic’.
“What they’ve told us is they’re much more concerned that if they do speak out, they may have repercussions, including issues around career progression. That is not a health service, any of us want to be part of where they may actually suffer disadvantage by speaking up because of their skin colour. That all needs to end.”
Dr Nagpaul said he wants the government in 2021 to demonstrate they “have their backs”.
“It really should not have taken 90 per cent of doctors who have died coming from a BAME background to show the government just what the BAME healthcare workforce does for the nation.
“But now that tragically that has happened. In the coming year this is what the government must make sure it delivers on, which is showing proper valuing of its workforce, in particular, those who’ve come from all around the world, including those who also were born here, who are from a BAME background.”
The government accepted that BAME groups were disproportionately affected.
Its prioritisation guidance states, “Good vaccine coverage in BAME groups will be the most important factor within a vaccine programme in reducing inequalities for this group.
“Prioritisation of persons with underlying health conditions will also provide for greater vaccination of BAME communities who are disproportionately affected by such health conditions.”
A government spokesperson said, “All health and social care staff have been prioritised for the Covid-19 vaccine since the start of the programme, along with those of older age.
“Throughout the pandemic, we have prioritised protecting the most vulnerable in our society and have invested more than £4 million into research into Covid-19 and ethnic disparities so that we can go further.
“We are supporting the NHS and have committed £3 billion to maintain surge capacity and safe discharges over winter, on top of a record cash funding boost of £33.9 billion extra a year by 2023-24.”
‘Failure of leadership’
Both the Greater Manchester mayor, Andy Burham, and his London colleague, Sadiq Khan, have accused the government of a failure to understand the way the virus impacts south Asian and black communities.
Speaking exclusively to Eastern Eye, Burnham said the race disparity unit quarterly report in October report lacked credibility. “These may be things that people don’t want to face up to, but they have to face up to them,” he said. “Hard questions have to be asked. Why has Covid-19 hit some communities so much harder than others?
“One reason around (is) people’s professions. But there’s another; in terms of the quality of housing, overcrowded housing, poorly regulated housing in the private rented sector.
“These are the issues, and it’s because we have an unequal society where there isn’t fairness in terms of access to opportunity that many people are trapped in jobs that don’t support them to have good health and housing, which equally doesn’t promote good health.”
Khan said his team had given the evidence of more south Asians being disproportionately affected by the virus. He told Eastern Eye that “without a doubt” this was a failure of leadership. “Anybody who’s examined the data from Public Health England, and also the data that councils have produced, and we’ve produced, can’t but conclude there is structural institutional racism still in 2020 across the United Kingdom,” Khan said.
“For the government to be in denial about this is frankly shocking, and it beggars belief. What I’d say to the government generally, is look at the data speak to the experts and recognise there are big problems, structural problems, that still exist in our country, I’m the first person to accept and be proud of the progress we’ve made. We’re not the same country we were 10, 20, 30, 40 years ago, but there are still challenges.
Sky TV customers across the UK faced widespread disruption on Thursday night, with issues continuing into Friday morning despite the company saying things were back to normal.
The problems, which began around 9pm, saw more than 30,000 users unable to access TV content. Most complaints were linked to Sky Q boxes crashing or freezing. Some viewers were stuck with error messages saying they couldn’t watch TV due to “connectivity issues” even though their internet seemed fine.
— (@)
By Friday morning, over 2,500 users were still reporting trouble, according to tracking site DownDetector. Most problems (87%) were TV-related, while a smaller number mentioned full blackouts or broadband issues.
DownDetector chart shows view of problems reported in the last 24 hours Downdetector
Sky said the issue stemmed from a technical glitch that pushed some Sky Q boxes into standby mode. “We’re sorry some customers had trouble accessing Sky Q,” the company said. “The issue was quickly resolved, and service has been restored.”
However, many users said otherwise. On social media and DownDetector, complaints kept coming in. Some said rebooting the Sky box worked temporarily, only for it to crash again. Others were irritated by the lack of updates from Sky, especially as the blackout clashed with the Eurovision Song Contest semi-final, a big night for live TV.
“I’ve restarted my box six times already. It just keeps going off again,” one user in Southport wrote. Another from Sheffield posted: “Still down this morning.”
Sky recommends a basic fix: unplug your Sky Q box from the power socket for 30 seconds, then turn it back on. For some, that’s worked. For others, the issue returns after a while.
Downdetector shows the most affected locations and problems Downdetector
Posting on X this morning, the official Sky account shared : "We are aware of some technical issues overnight that led to Sky Q boxes to go into standby mode. Our technical team worked quickly to investigate and restore service.
"If your Sky Q box is still stuck in standby please switch off your Sky Q box at the power socket for 30 seconds and back on again which will restore service. We’re sorry for any inconvenience caused."
Sky’s own help page offers a few steps to try: reboot the box, check Wi-Fi, update the software, and make sure your remote and connections are working. But when none of that helps, users are left in the dark.
DownDetector, a platform that tracks service interruptions, showed how the problem spread and continued, even after Sky’s official fix.
This article was updated following Sky’s public statement issued on Friday morning.
Disability campaigners from 'Dignity in Dying' hold placards as they demonstrate outside The Palace of Westminster during a gathering in favour of the proposals to legalise assisted suicide in the UK.
A PROPOSED law that would allow assisted dying for terminally ill people will return to parliament on Friday, with lawmakers set to debate a series of changes before a final vote on whether the bill should proceed.
In November, lawmakers voted 330 to 275 in favour of allowing assisted dying. If passed, the legislation would make Britain one of several countries including Australia, Canada, and some US states to permit assisted dying.
The bill allows mentally competent adults in England and Wales, who have six months or less to live, to end their lives with medical assistance. It has already been revised following detailed scrutiny.
A final vote on the updated bill will take place after Friday’s debate. The large number of proposed amendments means the session may continue next month.
Supporters of the bill point to opinion polls showing most Britons favour assisted dying and say the law should reflect public opinion. However, some lawmakers have raised concerns about protections for vulnerable people. Others argue that palliative care should be improved first.
The Telegraph and Guardian reported that some lawmakers who previously supported the bill are now reconsidering their position.
Prime minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government is neutral on the issue. Lawmakers are free to vote based on their personal views rather than party lines.
A key change from the original version of the bill is the removal of the requirement for court approval. Instead, a panel including a senior legal figure, a psychiatrist and a social worker would decide whether a person is terminally ill and capable of making the decision.
Any further changes to the bill will need to be approved through separate votes. If Friday’s debate runs out of time, the discussion could continue on June 13, before the final vote.
If passed, the bill will move to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.
In 2015, lawmakers rejected similar legislation by 330 votes to 118.
The current bill does not apply to Northern Ireland or Scotland. On Tuesday, the Scottish parliament voted in favour of a similar proposal, which will now move forward for further consideration.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
India's defence minister Rajnath Singh said, 'I believe a big portion of the $1 billion coming from IMF will be used for funding terror infrastructure.'
INDIA's defence minister Rajnath Singh on Friday said the International Monetary Fund (IMF) should reconsider its decision to approve a $1 billion loan to Pakistan, alleging that Islamabad was using the funds to support terrorism.
"I believe a big portion of the $1 billion coming from IMF will be used for funding terror infrastructure," Singh told troops at an air force base in western India. "I believe any economic assistance to Pakistan is nothing less than funding terror."
India and Pakistan had engaged in missile, drone and artillery strikes last week before a ceasefire began on Saturday.
The IMF last week approved a review of its loan programme for Pakistan, unlocking about $1 billion and approving a further $1.4 billion bailout. India objected to the decision but abstained from the review vote.
India, which represents Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh on the IMF board, said in a finance ministry statement that it had "concerns over the efficacy of IMF programmes in case of Pakistan given its poor track record".
Pakistan was on the verge of default in 2023 amid a political crisis and economic downturn. The IMF extended a $7 billion bailout to Pakistan last year, its 24th such assistance since 1958.
Singh said, "It is now clear that in Pakistan terrorism and their government are hand in glove with each other.
"In this situation there is a possibility that their nuclear weapons could get their way into the hands of terrorists. This is a danger not just for Pakistan but the entire world."
The recent fighting between India and Pakistan began on May 7, when India launched strikes on what it called "terrorist camps" in Pakistan. The strikes followed an April attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people.
India blamed Pakistan for supporting the terrorists it said were responsible for the attack. Pakistan has denied the charge.
The four-day exchange of missiles, drones and artillery killed around 70 people on both sides, including dozens of civilians.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Koolesh Shah, Reena Ranger OBE, Ameet Jogia and Sir Oliver Dowden
SIR OLIVER DOWDEN MP and businessman Koolesh Shah have been appointed co-chairs of the Conservative Friends of India (CF India), following the resignation of Ameet Jogia MBE and Reena Ranger OBE, who had led the organisation since 2019.
Jogia and Ranger stepped down after a five-year term that saw CF India grow into the Conservative party’s largest affiliate group, a statement said. The group was founded by Lord Dolar Popat with prime minister David Cameron in 2012.
Appointed by then-prime minister Boris Johnson, their leadership coincided with two general elections, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the appointment of Britain’s first prime minister of Indian origin, Rishi Sunak.
Sir Oliver is a senior Tory MP who has held several ministerial roles, including deputy prime minister and secretary of state for digital, culture, media and sport. Shah, founder of the London Town Group, is active in philanthropy and community work, particularly in education and social mobility. Sir Oliver and Shah said, “It is a privilege to take on this responsibility and build on the outstanding work of Ameet and Reena. CF India plays a vital role in ensuring that the voice of the British Indian community is heard, valued, and represented in the political mainstream, especially during this highly sensitive time. We are committed to deepening that engagement, supporting the next generation of leaders, and continuing to celebrate the values we share – from entrepreneurship to public service, and from community cohesion to our enduring ties with India.”
Under the outgoing co-chairs, CF India said it significantly strengthened the party’s engagement with British Indian communities. According to the statement, the group played a key role in the 2024 general election, contributing to the Tory victory in Leicester East, where the party’s vote share rose from 11 per cent in 2001 to 49 per cent.
Jogia and Ranger also oversaw the development of outreach, training, and fundraising initiatives. They credited CF India’s director, Nayaz Qazi, and grassroots supporters for their contributions to the group’s progress.
In their farewell statement, Jogia and Ranger said, “We leave with immense pride, having brought vibrancy, energy, and renewed purpose to an organisation that has been integral to our political journeys from the start. We will always support CF India and its new leadership.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Sandhya has been unable to afford repatriating the body to India or arranging a burial in the UK.
SANDHYA R, a 47-year-old councillor from Pala municipality in Kerala’s Kottayam district, has been working in London for the past nine months on a dependent visa after mounting debts forced her to seek work abroad.
Her situation worsened in April when her husband, Vinukumar, also 47, died of a suspected heart attack at his East Ham residence in the UK, Onmanorama reported.
Sandhya has been unable to afford repatriating the body to India or arranging a burial in the UK. The body remains in a hospital mortuary. She was elected from Murikkumpuzha ward on a CPI ticket and is currently the chairperson of the Public Works Standing Committee in Pala.
A post-graduate and former temporary UP school teacher, she left for the UK in September 2024 after selling the family’s house and vehicles due to financial losses in the share market and online loans.
She told Onmanorama that her husband had lost his phone and struggled to maintain contact before his death. Sandhya had briefly returned to Pala in February 2025 to vote in a no-confidence motion that unseated then chairman Shaju Thuruthan. She said her party arranged her travel.
Though a British Malayali charity offered help for the funeral, she declined after rumours spread in her hometown that she was profiting from the funds. “I didn’t take a penny from anyone,” she said.
Municipal chairman Thomas Peter and councillors Neena George and Maya Pradeep confirmed that ward and committee functions continue in her absence. Sandhya said she is in touch with residents and wants to secure a better job to support her daughters, aged 19 and 15. “That’s my only goal now,” she said.