STAFF SERGEANT SOHAIL ASHRAF of the British Army has called on the Asian community to consider donating blood.
According to him, the donation could “save someone’s life in their hour of need”.
The most recent data from the NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) shows that fewer than five per cent of donors who gave blood in the last year were from black, Asian and minority ethnic communities. This is despite BAME communities comprising around 14 per cent of the UK population.
Ashraf noted the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the NHS, but said he believed that the emphasis on the virus may lead to other illnesses being overlooked. The need for blood was still vital, he added.
“People may forget about all the other illnesses that are out there,” he told Eastern Eye. “But the NHS needs that blood, it’s really important.”
Acharya Krishan Attri is the British Army’s Hindu chaplain. He is also an advocate
for blood donation and is a regular donor. Whenever he donates blood, he
makes sure to post information on his social media pages to encourage others.
Acharya Krishan Attri is a regular blood donor
“I put them on social media to show people there is nothing wrong with donating
blood and there is a great need for it, especially for those from an ethnic background,” Attri told Eastern Eye.
Ashraf said he first became aware of blood donation when his father died more than 12 years ago. While visiting him in hospital, Ashraf spoke to a nurse who told him about blood donation.
“It brought it home to me when I was speaking to the nurse about the lack of blood donorship from the Asian community,” said Ashraf, who was awarded an MBE in 2018 for his years of continuous work within the BAME community. “I did a bit of digging and found out how it all worked. I decided I wanted to do it because I could save someone’s life.”
He has regularly donated blood ever since. However, he believes the lack of Asian blood donors is down to several misconceptions. For instance, some may be wary of donating blood in case it goes against their religion.
“There may be perceptions within the Muslim community, for example, and they may think they shouldn’t be giving blood,” Ashraf explained. “But the holy books all say, if you can save someone’s life, that’s a good thing.”
There may also be a fear around the procedure itself, he said. “Having a needle inserted and then having a big bag right next to you which starts to fill up with blood… there is definitely a fear factor around it,” he said. “But I think people need to get down into the weeds of knowing how it all works. Giving that amount of blood every six months or so will not make a blind bit of difference [to their health].”
Attri agreed that some people may feel apprehensive about the process. “I’ve seen people feeling scared because they have never done it before, but we have doctors who support them and give them encouragement that there is nothing wrong,” he said. “They just need some encouragement from the community leaders and experienced people.”
Ashraf also believes there is a lack of media attention on the issue. “There needs to be targeted media campaigns to explain the reasons why we need to give blood,” he said.
Attri said services were “desperate” for donations from minority communities. “There is a shortage of blood, especially for people from ethnic backgrounds,” he explained. “People should definitely come forward, to help and support us.”
A child is hoisted into a small boat as migrants wait in the water for a 'taxi boat' to take them across the channel to the UK at dawn on September 19, 2025 in Gravelines, France. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
BRITAIN's plan to use artificial intelligence (AI) to assess the ages of asylum seekers has sparked concern among human rights groups, who warn the technology could misclassify children as adults and deny them vital protections.
The government intends to introduce facial age-estimation technology in 2026 to verify the ages of migrants claiming to be under 18, particularly those arriving on small boats from France. Officials say the move will help prevent adults from posing as children to exploit the asylum system.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is under growing pressure to control migration, as Nigel Farage’s anti-immigration Reform UK party gains support in opinion polls. More than 35,000 people have crossed the English Channel in small boats this year, a 33 per cent rise on the same period in 2024.
Meanwhile, rights campaigners and social workers argue that assessing the age of migrants is a complex and sensitive process that cannot be replaced by technology.
“Assessing the ages of migrants is a complex process which should not be open to shortcuts,” said Luke Geoghegan, head of policy and research at the British Association of Social Workers. “This should never be compromised for perceived quicker results through artificial intelligence.”
Children who arrive in the UK without parents or guardians are entitled to legal aid, education, and social worker support under the care of local authorities. Charities fear that using facial recognition systems could result in minors being wrongly placed in adult asylum hotels, without proper safeguarding or support.
The Home Office said the technology would not be used in isolation. “Robust age assessments for migrants are vital to maintaining border security,” a spokesperson said. “This technology will not be used alone, but as part of a broad set of methods used by trained assessors.”
Governments worldwide are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to manage migration. Britain announced in April that it would deploy AI tools to speed up asylum decisions, helping caseworkers summarise interviews and analyse country-specific data. In July, it signed a partnership with OpenAI to explore how to use AI in education, justice, defence, and security.
But rights groups have warned that asylum seekers should not be used as test subjects for unproven technologies. “The asylum system must not be the testing ground for deeply flawed AI tools operating with minimal transparency,” said Sile Reynolds, head of asylum advocacy at Freedom from Torture.
Anna Bacciarelli, senior AI researcher at Human Rights Watch, said facial age estimation could “undermine privacy and other human rights”, adding: “We don’t actually know if it works.”
Facial recognition technologies have previously faced criticism for extracting sensitive biometric data and reinforcing racial or gender biases. They have also been used by London’s police at protests and public events, including the Notting Hill Carnival.
“There are always going to be worries about sensitive biometric data being taken from vulnerable people and used against them,” said Tim Squirrell, head of strategy at tech rights group Foxglove. “The machine tells you that you’re 19 – how do you question that? It’s completely unaccountable.”
Experts say AI models trained on biased or incomplete data can reproduce historic prejudices. The Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit (GMIAU) said some young asylum seekers had been told they were too tall or too hairy to be under 18.
“Children are being treated as subjects of immigration control, not as children,” said Rivka Shaw, a GMIAU policy officer, describing the practice as “linked to racism and adultification.”
The Helen Bamber Foundation found that nearly half of migrants reassessed in 2024 – about 680 people – were actually children wrongly sent to adult accommodation.
“A child in adult housing is put in a shared room with strangers and no safeguarding checks,” said Kamena Dorling, the foundation’s policy director.
A July report by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration urged the Home Office to involve trained child-protection professionals in age decisions.
“Decisions on age should be made by child-protection professionals,” said Dorling. “All the concerns we have about human decision-making also apply to AI decision-making.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.