Trump signs orders targeting university diversity policies and accreditation
One order directs the federal government to enforce existing laws requiring universities to disclose large foreign gifts. Another addresses accreditation, which Trump has described as a “secret weapon.”
Trump also announced an initiative on historically black colleges and universities and signed orders on AI education and workforce development.
DONALD TRUMP signed a set of executive orders on Wednesday aimed at US universities, focusing on foreign donations, college accreditation, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.
One order directs the federal government to enforce existing laws requiring universities to disclose large foreign gifts. Another addresses accreditation, which Trump has described as a “secret weapon.”
Reading the orders aloud, White House staff secretary Will Scharf said accrediting bodies have promoted “woke ideology” over merit.
Education secretary Linda McMahon said, “We should be looking at those who have real merit to get in, and we have to look harder at those universities that aren’t enforcing that.”
The administration has taken actions since 2017 to reshape higher education, including threats to funding, bans on diversity programmes, and detaining international students.
More than 150 university presidents signed a statement this week criticising what they called “unprecedented government overreach.”
Harvard University, named by Scharf, has sued the government over potential funding cuts, The Guardian reported.
A White House statement said the new orders allow federal action against accreditors for poor performance or civil rights violations.
Trump also announced an initiative on historically black colleges and universities and signed orders on AI education and workforce development.
A Chinese scientist working at a top US university has been arrested over allegations of smuggling a dangerous crop-destroying fungus into the United States. The pathogen, classified as a potential agroterrorism weapon, poses risks not only to crops but also to human and animal health.
Scientist pair accused of conspiracy
Yunqing Jian, 33, a researcher at the University of Michigan, was arrested and charged with conspiracy, smuggling, visa fraud and making false statements. Her partner, Zunyong Liu, 34, who previously worked at a university in China, is also accused in the case. US authorities allege that the pair conspired to bring Fusarium graminearum—a fungus responsible for billions in global agricultural losses—into the country.
The fungus causes a plant disease known as "head blight", particularly in wheat, rice and barley. It not only devastates harvests but can also lead to vomiting, liver damage and reproductive problems in both humans and livestock if ingested.
Fungus labelled as an ‘agroterrorism weapon’
According to the FBI, Fusarium graminearum is recognised in scientific circles as a potential agroterrorism threat due to its severe economic impact and its ability to contaminate food supplies. The US attorney’s office for the Eastern District of Michigan confirmed that the University of Michigan does not hold federal permits to handle this pathogen.
'Fusarium graminearum' is recognised in scientific circles as a potential agroterrorism threat Telegraph
“It is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses worldwide each year,” the statement added.
Smuggling attempt at Detroit airport
Authorities claim that Liu attempted to smuggle samples of the fungus through Detroit airport in July 2024. During an inspection, red-coloured plant material was discovered in his backpack. He was immediately returned to China, which does not have an extradition treaty with the US, making it unlikely that he will face charges unless he voluntarily returns.
Despite this, investigators say Jian was already working with the fungus at the University of Michigan before Liu’s interception. FBI director Kash Patel alleged via a post on X that Jian had previously received Chinese government funding for similar research in China.
Evidence of Communist Party loyalty
A search of Jian’s mobile phone revealed a document pledging her allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The declaration stated: “I adhere to the four basic principles, support the leadership of the Communist Party of China, resolutely implement the party’s educational guidelines and policies, love education, care for students, unite colleagues, love the motherland, and care about national affairs.”
The "four principles" referenced in the document include upholding socialism, the leadership of the CCP, Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought (Maoism), and the people’s democratic dictatorship.
US Attorney Jerome Gorgon Jr described the case as “of the gravest national security concerns,” citing fears that the CCP is using academics to infiltrate sensitive American institutions.
Suspicious research and communications
Investigators found messages between Jian and Liu indicating that they were both working on Fusarium graminearum in 2024. Liu's phone also contained an academic article titled "Plant-Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions", which raised further suspicions.
Liu's phone also contained an academic article titled "Plant-Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions"Telegraph
In court, Jian appeared handcuffed and visibly distressed. Her bond hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Journalists were barred from attending the session, but reports say she appeared shocked as the charges were read aloud.
University and White House respond
The University of Michigan issued a statement saying it had no involvement in the research and denied receiving any funding from the Chinese government related to the accused individuals.
“We strongly condemn any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university’s critical public mission,” the university said.
The case has surfaced at a sensitive time in US-China relations, with President Donald Trump expected to speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this week. Trade tensions remain high, particularly over agricultural tariffs, and US officials have expressed concern over China’s purchase of around 380,000 acres of American farmland, some near military installations.
Geopolitical backdrop
The arrest also comes amid a fragile pause in the ongoing US-China trade war. After Trump’s “liberation day” announcement on 2 April, tariffs on Chinese imports peaked at 145 per cent. China retaliated by placing levies on roughly £16 billion worth of US goods, particularly agricultural products, causing American grain prices to plummet.
The FBI has framed the fungus smuggling case as part of a broader pattern of Chinese interference in US domestic affairs, including attempts to undermine the nation’s food security.
“This case is a sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply,” said Patel.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The Beijing and Washington ties had already crashed since the trade war through Trump's tariffs
US President Donald Trump’s administration has announced it will “aggressively” revoke the visas of Chinese students studying in the United States.
"Those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields" will also be included in the revocation process, stated Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Tensions between Beijing and Washington had already deteriorated following the trade war sparked by Trump’s tariffs.
Estimates suggest that approximately 280,000 Chinese students were studying in the US last year. It remains unclear how many of them will be affected by this move.
China has strongly opposed the action and urged the US to pursue more constructive international relations.
Rubio also indicated that the increased scrutiny would apply to future visa applicants from China and Hong Kong. He has instructed US embassies worldwide to halt student visa appointments as the State Department plans to expand social media vetting for these applicants.
Although Chinese nationals previously formed the majority of international students at American universities, that trend is now shifting.
Data from the US State Department shows a decline in the number of Chinese students enrolling in American universities, largely due to deteriorating US-China relations during the pandemic era.
Currently, a significant number of foreign students are being deported, while others have had their visas revoked by the administration. Many of these actions are being challenged in court.
The US government has also frozen hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for universities. President Trump has criticised prestigious institutions such as Harvard for being overly liberal and for what he perceives as a failure to address antisemitism on campus.
Although Beijing has condemned the US in general terms, it has not issued a specific response to this visa crackdown.
Foreign students are vital to the financial health of many US universities, as they typically pay higher tuition fees.
According to the US Department of Commerce, Indian and Chinese students accounted for 54% of the international student population and contributed up to $50 billion to the US economy in 2023.
Some students have expressed regret over choosing US universities for their education.
Keep ReadingShow less
Two men were sentenced in the US for a human smuggling operation that led to the deaths of four Indian nationals near the Canada-US border in 2022. (Representational image:iStock)
TWO human traffickers were sentenced on Wednesday for their roles in a smuggling operation that led to the deaths of four Indian nationals in 2022, the US Department of Justice said.
Harshkumar Ramanlal Patel, 29, was sentenced to over 10 years in prison for organising the logistics of the operation, while co-conspirator Steve Anthony Shand, 50, was sentenced to over six years for picking up migrants in the United States.
A jury found the pair guilty of their roles in what officials described as a "large-scale human smuggling operation that brought Indian nationals to Canada on fraudulent student visas and then smuggled them into the United States," according to the DOJ.
In January 2022, Patel and Shand tried to smuggle 11 Indian nationals from Canada into the United States on foot in severe weather conditions. The DOJ said the recorded wind chill was -37.8 degrees Celsius (-36 degrees Fahrenheit).
A US Border Patrol agent found Shand’s van stuck in the snow in Minnesota, where Shand claimed there were no other people stranded.
But five more people came out of the fields, and one of them was airlifted to a hospital for lifesaving care.
Shand was arrested with two migrants, while the family of four was found later by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Their frozen bodies were discovered in an isolated area in Canada.
"The boy was wrapped in a blanket with his father's frozen glove covering his face," the DOJ said.
"Every time I think about this case I think about this family -- including two beautiful little children -- who the defendants left to freeze to death in a blizzard," said Acting US Attorney Lisa D Kirkpatrick.
(With inputs from AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
The exit was soon after his criticism about the legislative centrepiece of Trump’s agenda
Billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has announced his departure from Donald Trump’s administration after completing a turbulent efficiency drive, during which he served as a special government employee.
The initiative aimed to cut thousands of federal jobs and reduce the size of the US government.
Musk thanked US President Donald Trump for the opportunity to contribute to the Department of Government Efficiency—also known as DOGE—via social media platform X.
“As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,” Musk wrote on X. He added that the DOGE mission “will continue and eventually become a way of life with this government.”
His offboarding process from the White House began on Wednesday night.
Although Musk’s role was always intended to be temporary, his departure came shortly after he criticised a key part of Trump’s legislative agenda.
Musk expressed disappointment with the president’s budget bill, which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax cuts and a major increase in defence spending. He stated that “a bill can be either big or beautiful, but it cannot be both,” referring to Trump’s description of it as a “big, beautiful bill.” He warned that the bill could seriously undermine the DOGE mission.
He also called the president’s flagship tax legislation too expensive.
Tensions had also emerged between Musk and several Trump cabinet officials. Musk initially pledged to cut “at least $2 trillion” from the federal government budget, but later revised the target to $150 billion. He openly criticised White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, calling him a “moron” for rejecting his proposal for “zero tariffs” between the US and Europe.
As a result of the DOGE programme, around 260,000 out of the 2.3 million-strong federal civilian workforce have either been made redundant or accepted voluntary severance.
Musk’s exit was as low-key as his appointment, with no formal discussion with the president. However, he had been permitted to serve as a special federal employee for up to 130 days a year, and Trump had previously announced that Musk’s tenure would end in May.
The Tesla and SpaceX owner has now pledged to refocus on his business interests, which have struggled during his political stint.
Tesla experienced a 13 per cent drop in sales, and a 45 per cent fall in stock prices—later recovering to a 10 per cent dip. Investors are facing a difficult period, while activists have launched aggressive campaigns to boycott the company.
Musk has spent roughly $300 million supporting Trump’s presidential campaign and other Republican causes. However, he now says he plans to reduce his political spending, stating: “I think I have done enough.” Despite promising Trump’s advisers a $100 million contribution this year, the funds have yet to be delivered.
Keep ReadingShow less
The ruling also blocks the tariffs Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately under emergency powers.
A US federal court has blocked most of Donald Trump’s tariffs from taking effect, lifting markets on Thursday even as the White House filed an appeal against the ruling.
The decision is a setback for Trump as he pushes to reshape US trade relations by using tariffs to bring governments to the negotiating table.
Trump’s trade war has unsettled financial markets with the staggered introduction of import duties aimed at countries that sell more to the United States than they buy.
He argued that these trade deficits and drug inflows created a “national emergency” that justified the tariffs.
However, the three-judge Court of International Trade found Trump had overstepped his authority and barred most of the restrictions he had announced since taking office.
The White House criticised the ruling, saying that “unelected judges” should not intervene in Trump’s trade actions.
“President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American greatness,” Trump’s spokesman Kush Desai said.
Attorneys for the administration filed an appeal against the ruling on Wednesday.
Stephen Miller, one of Trump’s top aides, wrote on social media that there had been a “judicial coup” that was “out of control.”
Trump announced the broad tariffs on April 2, setting a baseline of 10 per cent and introducing higher duties on dozens of economies, including China and the European Union.
The ruling also blocks the tariffs Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately under emergency powers.
The markets stabilised after Trump paused some of the larger tariffs for 90 days and suspended other duties while talks with individual countries and trade blocs were underway.
Asian markets rose after the ruling, while European and US futures also showed gains.
Japan’s trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa said as he left for more talks in Washington that Tokyo would review the ruling, after facing tariffs on cars.
‘Extraordinary threat’
The federal trade court was handling two cases brought by businesses and a group of state governments. They argued that Trump had overreached Congress’s power over public spending.
“The question in the two cases before the court is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (“IEEPA”) delegates these powers to the president in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world,” the three-judge panel wrote in an unsigned opinion.
“The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder.”
The court, which hears civil trade dispute cases, said any interpretation of the IEEPA giving unlimited tariff power to the president was unconstitutional.
The IEEPA allows the president to impose necessary economic measures during an emergency “to combat an unusual and extraordinary threat,” the court said.
The ruling gave the White House 10 days to complete the administrative steps to stop the tariffs.
Gregory W Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the decision confirmed that “these tariffs are an illegal abuse of executive power.”
“Trump’s declaration of a bogus national emergency to justify his global trade war was an absurd and unlawful use of IEEPA,” he said.
The Justice Department has defended Trump’s trade policy in court, arguing that judges have only limited authority in such matters. Critics say the administration has tried to take powers away from the other branches of government.
Trump has said that the tariffs would benefit Americans, highlighting early deals with Britain and China.
Analysts warn that the tariffs will increase costs for US consumers, driving up inflation and potentially causing the US central bank to keep interest rates higher for longer, adding more pressure on financial markets.