Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

'Broadcast research shows why regulator is not fit for purpose'

'Broadcast research shows why regulator is not fit for purpose'

EVERY Sunday, we had a ritual in our family. It was 1969, and like tens of thousands of new arrivals from India, we would sit in front of our black and white televisions to watch Nai Zindagi Naya Jeevan.

Translated, it means ‘New Life, New Life’ but we can take it to mean ‘New Life, New Beginnings’. Mahendra Kaul and Salim Shahed, two avuncular presenters who oozed warmth, showed us how Britons expected us to behave.


Remember, this was a time long before chicken tikka masala was our national dish, or going for a curry on a Friday night, or the wonderful Goodness Gracious Me, which poked fun at ourselves and our white neighbours. It was the time when we were considered smelly, dirty foreigners who never washed.

Ironic, considering our white neighbours would douse themselves in talcum powder and deodorant, while my sisters would often scrub me to within an inch of my life. I digress.

Nai Zindagi was the only TV show where someone looked like me or appeared to give two hoots about me. The BBC’s public service remit meant it set up the “multicultural unit”, which operated from Birmingham – something familiar about that idea, no?

For south Asians it meant Network East and Desi DNA, which spawned some big names. Remember Sanjeev Bhaskar, Krishnan Guru-Murthy and Sanjeev Kholi? They all cut their creative teeth on these shows. That’s on-screen talent.

Behind were people like Paresh Solanki, Aaqil Ahmed and Tommy Nagra. I note the absence of female names. But, if I’m not mistaken, one Meera Syal did appear on Nai Zindagi explaining why south Asian women should have careers, much to the consternation of the men in the studio.

I hark back to those days because last week, Ofcom trumpeted its latest attempt to show it truly cares for minorities. The report declared, “Ofcom commissioned Ethnic Dimension, a research agency that specialises in working with minority ethnic communities, to conduct research to help understand awareness and expectations of broadcasting standards among the audiences of TV channels and radio stations aimed specifically at minority ethnic communities in the UK.”

Yippee-de-do-dah. Are we really supposed to be impressed? This is 2021, and not 1971. What an absolute waste of time, money and effort.

Its conclusions are so prosaic as to be offensively fatuous. “The research found that channels aimed at minority ethnic communities play a key role for these communities and are highly valued by them. Most participants said that engaging with these services gave them a sense of belonging and connection to their ethnic communities.

“For first-generation participants, content targeting their ethnic community was typically their primary viewing, while second-generation participants switched consumption between both this and mainstream content; and third-generation participants mainly used mainstream content.”

No s***, Sherlock. And just remind me, how do I make an omelette? Do I need to break eggs first? And should I add salt before or after I whisk the eggs? I found myself going through the stages of grief – only, I couldn’t get past the anger stage. I know as a person of colour I can’t afford to get angry, because we’re aggressive, not assertive in our views; we inflame the sensitivities of white folk, and we scare them.

But.

You. Said. Nothing. New.

You. Wasted. My. Time.

You. Wasted. Your. Time.

And. Taxpayer. Money. On. This. So-called. Study.

I don’t need a report to tell me what five million south Asians know, but is never mentioned in this “study”. Broadcasters don’t give a fig about people of colour or what we want. They pay lip service to the programmes we want to make and see.

That is because white people still hold the levers of power, and they will never allow a critical mass to challenge their thinking. They have never walked in our shoes. They will never walk in our shoes. And like the colonials who exploited – and eventually divided – India, they find people of colour who will say and do what their white masters want.

Of course, my fellow ethnic brothers and sisters will be appalled by my words. To those who disagree, I say this. I came to the UK in 1969. I became a broadcaster in 1981. I was a non-executive director of Ofcom for five years. I have worked for and with parliamentarians.

I have had close dealings with UK government departments. I understand the rules of the game. But if we agree that a generation is 20 years, why are we still having to bang on about diversity and inclusion in the third decade of the 21st century?

The time for Ofcom to realise it is not fit for purpose is now. It didn’t ask the right question. That question is – why are people of colour so disenfranchised from mainstream media?

More For You

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: How history can shape a new narrative for Britain

Doreen Simson, 87, a child evacuee from London; 100-year-old former Wren Ruth Barnwell; and veteran Henry Rice, 98, in front of a full-size replica Spitfire during an event organised by SSAFA, the UK’s oldest Armed Forces charity, to launch the ‘VE Day 80: The Party’ countdown outside Royal Albert Hall, in London

Comment: How history can shape a new narrative for Britain

IT WAS a day of celebration on May 8, 1945.

Winning the war was no longer any kind of surprise. After all, Hitler had committed suicide. What had once seemed in deep peril a few years later had become a matter of time.

Keep ReadingShow less
Your brain is lying to you—and it’s costing you breakthroughs

Fresh eyes can expose what the Curse of Knowledge has hidden.

iStock

Your brain is lying to you—and it’s costing you breakthroughs

Susan Robertson

Leadership today can feel like flying a plane through dense fog.

You’re managing priorities, pressures, and people. You’re flying through turbulence, and the instruments keep changing. And still, you’re expected to chart a clear course, adapt to change in real time, and help others do the same.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anurag Bajpayee's Gradiant: The water company tackling a global crisis

Anurag Bajpayee's Gradiant: The water company tackling a global crisis

Rana Maqsood

In a world increasingly defined by scarcity, one resource is emerging as the most quietly decisive factor in the future of industry, sustainability, and even geopolitics: water. Yet, while the headlines are dominated by energy transition and climate pledges, few companies working behind the scenes on water issues have attracted much public attention. One of them is Gradiant, a Boston-based firm that has, over the past decade, grown into a key player in the underappreciated but critical sector of industrial water treatment.

A Company Born from MIT, and from Urgency

Founded in 2013 by Anurag Bajpayee and Prakash Govindan, two researchers with strong ties to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Gradiant began as a scrappy start-up with a deceptively simple premise: make water work harder. At a time when discussions about climate change were centred almost exclusively on carbon emissions and renewable energy, the trio saw water scarcity looming in the background.

Keep ReadingShow less