Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Breaking free of digital addiction

Breaking free of digital addiction

IN 2016, I wrote a column on ‘smartphone compulsive disorder’, a growing concern that began to infiltrate our daily lives.

Fast-forward eight years, and the debate about the detrimental effects of excessive social media use continues incessantly. It’s startling that despite the wealth of research highlighting the negative consequences, we are still grappling with this issue.


In 2017, I followed up with a column on social media anxiety, exploring the psychological toll of constant online comparison and the fear of missing out. These issues remain prevalent today, and are exacerbated by the everevolving landscape of social media platforms.

According to a study published in the Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, our compulsive need to check our smartphones is primarily driven by boredom. The average user checks their device a staggering 35 times a day, and given that we are on autopilot for almost half of our waking hours, it’s no wonder feelings of being overwhelmed and stressed remain on the rise.

While social media offers numerous benefits, it’s crucial to acknowledge the potential dangers.

The proliferation of hate speech, misinformation and violence fuelled by online platforms is a stark reminder of the negative consequences of unchecked digital consumption. The evidence is mounting that children ‘doomscrolling’ for hours a day is causing widespread harm. We need the equivalent of the ‘seatbelt’ legislation for social media use for children.

Children are particularly vulnerable to the addictive nature of social media, which can negatively impact their social skills, selfesteem, and overall wellbeing. The rise of plastic surgery among young people seeking to achieve the unrealistic beauty standards portrayed on social media is a clear indication of the harmful effects of these platforms.

We must educate young people about the importance of self-belief and genuine, positive connections, rather than the superficial and often filtered relationships built online.

Parents are in an impossible position over whether to expel their children from social media or expose them to harmful and addictive content. Countries around the world are also taking bold action, and in Britain, our children risk being left behind.

The time has come for policymakers to take decisive action to protect our mental health and the wellbeing of future generations. A new UK law banning smartphones in schools in England, as proposed in a private members’ bill, is a step in the right direction, but is completely banning phones in schools necessary? Perhaps a more balanced approach would involve educating people to use technology mindfully, as I have advocated in previous columns.

Additionally, social media platforms must take accountability and implement measures to make their content less addictive for children and young people. By regulating smartphone usage and social media, we can create a healthier digital environment that prioritises our mental well-being and promotes meaningful human connections.

It’s time to break free from the chains of digital addiction and reclaim our lives. For more helpful tips and conversations on healing from the digital overwhelm, listen to Healing Place, wherever you get your podcasts.

@itsmitamistry

@healingplacepod

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Shein sales dip

Shein says rising trade barriers are making its low-cost retail model harder to sustain

Shein

The rule change that's forcing Shein to rethink its low-price strategy

  • Shein reported a £74 million ($99 million) quarterly loss after US tariff changes hit sales.
  • The retailer says it may raise prices to offset higher import costs in key markets.
  • Fresh EU import charges could add further pressure to Shein's low-cost business model.

Shein's low-cost fashion business is facing one of its biggest tests yet after new trade rules in the US hit sales and raised questions over whether the retailer can continue offering ultra-cheap products in its biggest markets.

In a regulatory filing ahead of its planned Hong Kong stock market listing, the fast-fashion company reported a net loss of $99 million (£74 million) for the three months to the end of March, compared with a $395 million (£296 million) profit a year earlier. Revenue rose just 1.1 per cent to $9.05 billion (£6.78 billion), signalling a sharp slowdown in growth.

Keep ReadingShow less