Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Bollywood’s age-old problem of casting refuses to go away

MALE STARS CHOOSING INAPPROPRIATELY YOUNG LEADING LADIES IN FILMS IS PREMATURELY PUSHING OLDER A-LIST ACTRESSES ASIDE

by ASJAD NAZIR


PERFECT example of Bollywood ageism towards female actresses is 53-year-old Akshay Kumar romancing 28-year-old Kiara Advani in recent Diwali film release Laxmii.

Other films Akshay Kumar has on the way include Prithviraj with 23-year-old Manushi Chhillar, Atrangi Re co-starring 25-year-old Sara Ali Khan and Bachchan Pandey opposite 28-year-old Kriti Sanon. This practice of big age gaps has been going on for many decades and while most male stars continue playing leads well into their fifties and beyond, females start getting retired from frontline roles when they hit their thirties.

With most Bollywood A-list actors being well into their fifties, the age gap between them and their leading ladies will likely increase more in coming years. Akshay Kumar isn’t the only one acting opposite much younger heroines.

54-year-old Salman Khan will star opposite 28-year-old Disha Patani in next year’s major Eid release Radhe: Your Most Wanted Bhai and was cast opposite her in his 2019 film Bharat. In his last film, Dabangg 3, Salman had starred opposite Sonakshi Sinha, 33, and 22-year-old Saiee Manjrekar.

Actresses Shah Rukh Khan romanced in the 1990s like Juhi Chawla, Madhuri Dixit and Kajol are being pushed into motherly roles, despite being younger than him, while he has romanced leading ladies over 20 years his junior like Deepika Padukone, with whom he stars once again in forthcoming film Pathan.

Meanwhile, Aamir Khan was well into his forties when he played a young college student in 3 Idiots and Ajay Devgn romanced Polish actress Erika Kaar in Shivaay, who is almost 20 years younger than him.

This practice of age-appropriate leading ladies being sidelined and heroes carrying on playing characters much younger than them has been going on for decades, with many cringe-worthy moments like a 57-year-old Amitabh Bachchan starring opposite a 28-year-old Manisha Koirala in Laal Baadshah. Dev Anand had starred opposite Tina Munim, who was 34 years younger, and other actresses like Zeenat Aman, 28 years his junior. Rishi Kapoor was 40 when he romanced a 19-year old Divya Bharti in Deewana.

Chasing after much younger women filtered into real life, with the most shocking example being 31-year-old superstar Rajesh Khanna marrying Dimple Kapadia in 1973, when she was just 15. There have of course been many stories of young Bollywood actresses being forced onto the casting couch by powerful men old enough to be their fathers.

Even today when more diverse subjects are being tackled, older Bollywood leading ladies struggle to get meaningful roles in blockbusters.

That is why you will likely see a lot less of female superstars who are in their thirties in major Hindi films, and many are preparing for this inevitable Bollywood ageism with other ventures.

Priyanka Chopra, 38, is concentrating on Hollywood, Anushka Sharma, 32, has a thriving production company and Katrina Kaif, 37, just celebrated one year of her beauty brand. Meanwhile, Vidya Balan, 41, is transitioning to character-based roles and recently played the mother to 28-year-old Sanya Malhotra in Shakuntala Devi, which is something no older hero in their fifties would do.

Little is being done to redress the balance and the biggest culprits are established leading men, choosing to star opposite actresses young enough to be their daughters, instead of standing up for older heroines. Like previous generations of powerful leading men, most can combat ageism, but choose not to grow old gracefully and play less than convincing younger characters.

One leading lady said anonymously, “the ageism is largely driven by male actors choosing to star opposite much younger heroines. If they wanted to act opposite age-appropriate actresses they could. Most don’t want to accept they are getting old.”

As these much-loved heroes do get older, they will start becoming somewhat of a joke like so many from past generations, who put on the hair dye and tried to convince audiences they were 20-30 years younger. So, when you watch blockbusters in coming years, don’t be surprised if you cringe a little.

More For You

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment
ROOH: Within Her
ROOH: Within Her

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

DRAMATIC DANCE

CLASSICAL performances have been enjoying great popularity in recent years, largely due to productions crossing new creative horizons. One great-looking show to catch this month is ROOH: Within Her, which is being staged at Sadler’s Wells Theatre in London from next Wednesday (23)to next Friday (25). The solo piece, from renowned choreographer and performer Urja Desai Thakore, explores narratives of quiet, everyday heroism across two millennia.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lord Macaulay plaque

Amit Roy with the Lord Macaulay plaque.

Club legacy of the Raj

THE British departed India when the country they had ruled more or less or 200 years became independent in 1947.

But what they left behind, especially in Calcutta (now called Kolkata), are their clubs. Then, as now, they remain a sanctuary for the city’s elite.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

US president Donald Trump gestures while speaking during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC

Getty Images

Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four was the most influential novel of the twentieth century. It was intended as a dystopian warning, though I have an uneasy feeling that its depiction of a world split into three great power blocs – Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia – may increasingly now be seen in US president Donald Trump’s White House, Russian president Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin or China president Xi Jingping’s Zhongnanhai compound in Beijing more as some kind of training manual or world map to aspire to instead.

Orwell was writing in 1948, when 1984 seemed a distantly futuristic date that he would make legendary. Yet, four more decades have taken us now further beyond 1984 than Orwell was ahead of it. The tariff trade wars unleashed from the White House last week make it more likely that future historians will now identify the 2024 return of Trump to the White House as finally calling the post-war world order to an end.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

Maharana Arvind Singh Mewar at the 2013 event at Lord’s, London

Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

SINCE I happened to be passing through Udaipur [in Rajasthan], I thought I would look up “Shriji” Arvind Singh Mewar.

He didn’t formally have a title since Indira Gandhi, as prime minister, abolished India’s princely order in 1971 by an amendment to the constitution. But everyone – and especially his former subjects – knew his family ruled Udaipur, one of the erstwhile premier kingdoms of Rajasthan.

Keep ReadingShow less
John Abraham
John Abraham calls 'Vedaa' a deeply emotional journey
AFP via Getty Images

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

YOUTUBE CONNECT

Pakistani actor and singer Moazzam Ali Khan received online praise from legendary Bollywood writer Javed Akhtar, who expressed interest in working with him after hearing his rendition of Yeh Nain Deray Deray on YouTube.

Keep ReadingShow less