Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Bollywood’s age-old problem of casting refuses to go away

MALE STARS CHOOSING INAPPROPRIATELY YOUNG LEADING LADIES IN FILMS IS PREMATURELY PUSHING OLDER A-LIST ACTRESSES ASIDE

by ASJAD NAZIR


PERFECT example of Bollywood ageism towards female actresses is 53-year-old Akshay Kumar romancing 28-year-old Kiara Advani in recent Diwali film release Laxmii.

Other films Akshay Kumar has on the way include Prithviraj with 23-year-old Manushi Chhillar, Atrangi Re co-starring 25-year-old Sara Ali Khan and Bachchan Pandey opposite 28-year-old Kriti Sanon. This practice of big age gaps has been going on for many decades and while most male stars continue playing leads well into their fifties and beyond, females start getting retired from frontline roles when they hit their thirties.

With most Bollywood A-list actors being well into their fifties, the age gap between them and their leading ladies will likely increase more in coming years. Akshay Kumar isn’t the only one acting opposite much younger heroines.

54-year-old Salman Khan will star opposite 28-year-old Disha Patani in next year’s major Eid release Radhe: Your Most Wanted Bhai and was cast opposite her in his 2019 film Bharat. In his last film, Dabangg 3, Salman had starred opposite Sonakshi Sinha, 33, and 22-year-old Saiee Manjrekar.

Actresses Shah Rukh Khan romanced in the 1990s like Juhi Chawla, Madhuri Dixit and Kajol are being pushed into motherly roles, despite being younger than him, while he has romanced leading ladies over 20 years his junior like Deepika Padukone, with whom he stars once again in forthcoming film Pathan.

Meanwhile, Aamir Khan was well into his forties when he played a young college student in 3 Idiots and Ajay Devgn romanced Polish actress Erika Kaar in Shivaay, who is almost 20 years younger than him.

This practice of age-appropriate leading ladies being sidelined and heroes carrying on playing characters much younger than them has been going on for decades, with many cringe-worthy moments like a 57-year-old Amitabh Bachchan starring opposite a 28-year-old Manisha Koirala in Laal Baadshah. Dev Anand had starred opposite Tina Munim, who was 34 years younger, and other actresses like Zeenat Aman, 28 years his junior. Rishi Kapoor was 40 when he romanced a 19-year old Divya Bharti in Deewana.

Chasing after much younger women filtered into real life, with the most shocking example being 31-year-old superstar Rajesh Khanna marrying Dimple Kapadia in 1973, when she was just 15. There have of course been many stories of young Bollywood actresses being forced onto the casting couch by powerful men old enough to be their fathers.

Even today when more diverse subjects are being tackled, older Bollywood leading ladies struggle to get meaningful roles in blockbusters.

That is why you will likely see a lot less of female superstars who are in their thirties in major Hindi films, and many are preparing for this inevitable Bollywood ageism with other ventures.

Priyanka Chopra, 38, is concentrating on Hollywood, Anushka Sharma, 32, has a thriving production company and Katrina Kaif, 37, just celebrated one year of her beauty brand. Meanwhile, Vidya Balan, 41, is transitioning to character-based roles and recently played the mother to 28-year-old Sanya Malhotra in Shakuntala Devi, which is something no older hero in their fifties would do.

Little is being done to redress the balance and the biggest culprits are established leading men, choosing to star opposite actresses young enough to be their daughters, instead of standing up for older heroines. Like previous generations of powerful leading men, most can combat ageism, but choose not to grow old gracefully and play less than convincing younger characters.

One leading lady said anonymously, “the ageism is largely driven by male actors choosing to star opposite much younger heroines. If they wanted to act opposite age-appropriate actresses they could. Most don’t want to accept they are getting old.”

As these much-loved heroes do get older, they will start becoming somewhat of a joke like so many from past generations, who put on the hair dye and tried to convince audiences they were 20-30 years younger. So, when you watch blockbusters in coming years, don’t be surprised if you cringe a little.

More For You

indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

DIVISIVE AGENDA:Police clash withprotesters outside Epping councilafter a march from the Bell Hotelhousing asylum seekers last Sunday(31)

Getty Images

Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

August is dubbed 'the silly season’ as the media must fill the airwaves with little going on. But there was a more sinister undertone to how that vacation news vacuum got filled this year. The recurring story of the political summer was the populist right’s confidence in setting the agenda and the anxiety of opponents about how to respond.

Tensions were simmering over asylum. Yet frequent predictions of mass unrest failed to materialise. The patchwork of local protests and counter-protests had a strikingly different geography to last summer. The sporadic efforts of disorder came in the affluent southern suburbs of Epping and Hillingdon, Canary Wharf and Cheshunt with no disorder and few large protests in the thirty towns that saw riots last August. Prosecutions, removing local ringleaders, deter. Local cohesion has been a higher priority where violence broke out than everywhere else. Hotel use for asylum has halved - and is more common in the south. The Home Office went to court to keep asylum seekers in Epping’s Bell Hotel, for now, yet stresses its goal to stop using hotels by 2029. The Refugee Council’s pragmatic suggestion of giving time-limited leave to remain to asylum seekers from the five most dangerous countries could halve the need for hotels within months.

Keep ReadingShow less
Media’s new hate figure?
Naga Munchetty

Media’s new hate figure?

NAGA MUNCHETTY should feel secretly pleased that after Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, she has become the number one hate figure in the media, especially for white women feature writers who earn less than her £360,000.

Naga apparently gets cross with junior staff who don’t do her toast right – it apparently has to be burnt the way she likes it.

Keep ReadingShow less
tulip-siddiq-getty

Tulip Siddiq

Getty Images

Comment: Why Asian women in politics can’t afford a single misstep

HERE’S a list of Asian women politicians who have got into trouble in recent years for one reason or another – Rushanara Ali, Tulip Siddiq, Suella Braverman, Priti Patel, Baroness Pola Uddin and Rupa Huq.

Is it that they are held to higher standards than others? Or do some allow their greed to get the better of themselves, especially when it comes to expenses?

Keep ReadingShow less