Pramod Thomas is a senior correspondent with Asian Media Group since 2020, bringing 19 years of journalism experience across business, politics, sports, communities, and international relations. His career spans both traditional and digital media platforms, with eight years specifically focused on digital journalism. This blend of experience positions him well to navigate the evolving media landscape and deliver content across various formats. He has worked with national and international media organisations, giving him a broad perspective on global news trends and reporting standards.
Travis Head said batting alongside Australia star Steve Smith enabled him to "sneak under the radar" after compiling an unbeaten hundred on the opening day of the World Test Championship final against India on Wednesday (7).
Smith, one of the outstanding batsmen of his generation, has long been a prize wicket during a Test career that had yielded 8,792 runs, including 30 centuries.
The former Australia captain proved his worth again with an unbeaten 95 at The Oval, but it was Head who led the way with a scintillating 146 not out.
Australia reached stumps on 327-3, a superb recovery given they were 76-3 when Head walked out to bat.
Head, speaking following an unbroken stand of 251 with Smith, said: "Whenever I bat with him I always feel like I'm in the shadows, that you can sneak under the radar and go about your business because he draws so much attention.
"We're completely different but the partnership works really nicely."
Head's runs came from just 156 balls, including 22 fours and a six.
His sixth Test century was also his first outside Australia, an encouraging sign ahead of a five-match Ashes series in England that starts at Edgbaston next week.
"It's a nice feather in the cap, I'll look back in the future on a nice little moment," Head added.
India, appearing in their second WTC final after losing the inaugural 2021 showpiece match to New Zealand, had made a solid start after skipper Rohit Sharma won the toss.
They reduced Australia to 2-1 when Mohammed Siraj dismissed Usman Khawaja for a duck but, as the day wore on, their grip loosened amid a rash of wayward deliveries.
"The first 12, 15 overs, I think we really bowled in the right areas," said India bowling coach Paras Mhambrey.
"But maybe after a little bit, I thought we kind of weren't disciplined about our bowling."
India left out star off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin, the world's top-ranked Test bowler, having also done without him two years ago when they beat England by 157 runs in their last Test at The Oval.
"It's always a very difficult decision to drop a champion bowler like that," said Mhambrey.
"But I thought looking at the conditions in the morning, having the additional seamer would definitely be beneficial."
India's Agni 5 Missile is displayed during the final full dress rehearsal for the Indian Republic Day parade in New Delhi on January 23, 2013. (Photo: Getty Images)
India says it successfully tested Agni-5 missile from Odisha on August 20
Missile validated all operational and technical parameters
Agni-5 can carry a nuclear warhead to any part of China
INDIA on Wednesday (20) said it had successfully test-fired the Agni-5 intermediate-range ballistic missile from Odisha, with officials confirming it met all required standards.
The defence ministry said, “Intermediate range ballistic missile ‘Agni 5’ was successfully test-fired from the integrated test range, Chandipur in Odisha on August 20.”
In a statement, it added, “The launch validated all operational and technical parameters. It was carried out under the aegis of the Strategic Forces Command.”
Authorities also said the missile, once operational, will be capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to any part of China.
Regional security context
India and China are regional rivals and relations worsened in 2020 after a deadly border clash.
India is also part of the Quad security alliance with the United States, Australia and Japan, which is viewed as a counter to China.
India’s neighbour and rival Pakistan also possesses nuclear weapons.
The two countries came close to war in May after militants killed 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir, an attack India blamed on Pakistan. Islamabad denied any role.
Diplomatic ties
Despite tensions, Delhi and Beijing have taken steps to improve relations. Last October, prime minister Narendra Modi met Chinese leader Xi Jinping for the first time in five years at a summit in Russia.
Modi is expected to visit China later this month to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit.
At the same time, New Delhi’s ties with Washington have faced pressure. US president Donald Trump has asked India to stop purchasing Russian oil.
The United States has also said it will double new import tariffs on India from 25 per cent to 50 per cent by August 27 if India does not switch suppliers.
Missile programme
The Agni-5 is part of a series of indigenously developed short- and medium-range ballistic missiles designed to strengthen India’s defence posture against both Pakistan and China.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Helen Mirren says she would instantly return for a sequel
The film stars Mirren, Pierce Brosnan, Celia Imrie and Ben Kingsley as amateur detectives.
Richard Osman’s bestselling series already has three sequels in print, with another due this year.
Mirren praised her chemistry with Brosnan and her long friendships with Kingsley and Imrie.
Mirren open to sequels
Helen Mirren has revealed she would jump at the chance to reprise her role in Netflix’s upcoming adaptation of The Thursday Murder Club.
The Oscar-winning actress stars alongside Pierce Brosnan, Celia Imrie and Ben Kingsley in the crime comedy based on Richard Osman’s bestselling novel. The story follows four pensioners in a retirement village who band together to solve the murder of a local property developer.
Mirren said filming was such an enjoyable experience that she would return for more without hesitation. “(I’d do another) in a nanosecond. And it would be the team getting back together, which would be great. We did have a wonderful time shooting this. So all of us would jump at the chance, quite honestly,” she told Radio Times.
Osman’s books pave the way
Richard Osman has published three follow-ups to The Thursday Murder Club — The Man Who Died Twice, The Bullet That Missed and The Last Devil to Die — with another instalment due later this year. The ready-made sequels boost the chances of the film being developed into a series.
Bonding with co-stars
Celia Imrie, Sir Ben Kingsley, Dame Helen Mirren and Pierce Brosnan attend The Thursday Murder ClubGetty Images
The 80-year-old actress also reflected on the friendships and professional ties behind the film’s ensemble cast. “Ben and I started out together in the Royal Shakespeare Company, both ambitious and obsessed. Celia and I became really good friends on Calendar Girls. Pierce is my wonderful late discovery. I’d like to work with Pierce for the rest of my life. I feel that we have a real chemistry.”
Mirren and Brosnan have since reunited for the crime drama series MobLand.
Release date
The Thursday Murder Club will have a limited cinema run before arriving on Netflix on 28 August.
Keep ReadingShow less
Protesters calling for the closure of the The Bell Hotel, believed to be housing asylum seekers, gather outside the council offices in Epping, on August 8, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
High Court blocks asylum seekers from being housed in Essex hotel
Nigel Farage calls for peaceful protests outside “migrant hotels”
Government considering appeal against injunction ruling
Debate grows over housing asylum seekers in hotels across Britain
NIGEL FARAGE has called for protests after a court ruling blocked the use of an Essex hotel to house asylum seekers.
On Tuesday, the High Court in London granted a temporary injunction stopping asylum seekers from being placed in the Bell Hotel in Epping, about 32 km northeast of London. The case, based on a planning issue, will be heard in full later this year.
Protests in Essex
The Bell Hotel has seen regular demonstrations since a resident was charged with sexual assault, which he denies. Police have deployed in large numbers to separate anti-immigration and pro-immigration groups during the protests.
The injunction has prompted other councils to seek legal advice on whether they can also act to remove asylum seekers from hotels in their areas.
Farage statement
Farage, leader of the Reform Party, said all 12 local authorities under his party’s control would act.
"Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win," he wrote in the Daily Telegraph.
"No doubt we will be attacked as 'far Right' provocateurs for daring to suggest that people follow the lead of Epping’s parents and residents by protesting peacefully."
Government response
Britain houses about 30,000 asylum seekers in more than 200 hotels while they await decisions on their claims. The government has said it plans to close them all by 2029.
The Home Office told the court that the injunction would have a "substantial impact" on its legal duty to provide accommodation. Security minister Dan Jarvis said the government was considering whether to appeal.
"The big challenge remains, which is, we need to process asylum claims much more speedily and much more effectively than was the case previously," Jarvis told BBC TV.
Labour revolt
Keir Starmer is facing pressure from Labour-run councils after a High Court ruling in Epping blocked the use of a hotel for asylum seekers.
Local authorities, including Wirral and Tamworth, have indicated they will challenge the Home Office over hotels being used without consultation or planning approval, The Telegraph reported.
Several other councils signalled they are preparing similar legal action.
Wider debate
Critics argue that housing asylum seekers in hotels puts communities at risk and point to crimes in Epping and elsewhere involving some migrants. Others highlight the contrast between hotel accommodation and the difficulties many in Britain face with rising costs and a lack of affordable housing.
Pro-migrant groups say far-right organisations and politicians are exploiting tensions for political purposes.
Across Europe, governments have faced similar disputes. In Britain last year, hotels with migrants were attacked during unrest linked to misinformation about a crime in Southport.
FIFTY years since Sholay was released, it has been watched by generations of audiences, but its director has said it is not a perfect film.
Written by Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar, Sholay tells the story of two small-time criminals hired by a former policeman to capture the ruthless gangster, Gabbar Singh.
The action-adventure movie was praised for its gripping storytelling, powerful dialogues and unforgettable characters played by Amitabh Bachchan, Dharmendra, Hema Malini, Jaya Bachchan, Sanjeev Kumar and Amjad Khan in his first major role as the villain Gabbar.
Director Ramesh Sippy said, “The fact that Sholay was made means something better than Sholay can also be made and people will learn to like that kind of film as well.”
He added, “I think you always want to better Sholay. That’s how you keep your spirits up. Otherwise, how will you carry on?”
In an interview at his office in Mumbai, the renowned filmmaker acknowledged the audience’s enduring love for every frame of the classic as “amazing”.
Gabbar Singh’s evil laughter, Jai-Veeru’s undying friendship (played by Bachchan and Dharmendra, respectively), Thakur’s (Kumar) quest for vengeance, Soorma Bhopali’s boastful banter and Basanti’s (Hema Malini) exuberant defiance are part of Indian cinematic history.
Since it was released on August 15, 1975, the film has stayed on in the hearts of generations of film goers who discovered it later.
Sippy said the entire team worked hard on the project and, when shooting was completed, he knew he had a “fine film” in hand. “You can’t think of any of these characters being played by any other actor or actress. It was just simply so good. They did their best. I was able to get performances which were amazing, because they are such fine artists and because as a script it was very satisfying and promising and everybody worked towards achieving what they could in their own capacities.”
“At the end we had a fine film in our hand which till today we are here talking about it 50 years later, it’s amazing,” he said.
Sippy’s filmography also includes hits such as Seeta Aur Geeta, Shaan, Shakti and Saagar, but the popularity of Sholay sets it apart. “I have tried my best to make good films before and after Sholay and I have succeeded as well, but somehow nothing stands out like Sholay,” the 78-year-old said.
“I do hope one day there is a film that beats Sholay. That’s the way the world is.
“You need to be better than what was. So everybody has to strive to do that.
Keep ReadingShow less
Anurag Kashyap has condemned the AI film Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal for undermining artists
Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap criticised Vijay Subramaniam for backing the AI-made film Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal.
Kashyap said the project undermines creativity and betrays the artists represented by Subramaniam’s agency.
Vikramaditya Motwane also expressed disapproval, warning of AI sidelining writers and directors.
The AI film is produced by Abundantia Entertainment and Collective Media Network, with a 2026 release planned.
Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap has sharply criticised the upcoming project Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal, promoted as India’s first fully AI-made film. The director targeted Vijay Subramaniam, head of Collective Artists Network, accusing him of betraying the very writers, actors and directors his agency represents. The backlash follows recent controversy over AI’s use in altering the Tamil release of Aanand L Rai’s Raanjhanaa.
Anurag Kashyap has condemned the AI film Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal for undermining artists Getty Images/ Instagram/abundantiaent
What is Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal ?
Earlier this week, production houses Abundantia Entertainment and Collective Media Network unveiled the poster of Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal. Marketed as the country’s first “Made-in-AI, Made-in-India” film, it is scheduled to release on Hanuman Jayanti 2026.
Producers claim the project will combine mythology with modern innovation, reimagining Lord Hanuman’s story for global audiences. They described the initiative as a tribute to India’s cultural legacy, brought alive through technology.
However, the announcement triggered heated debate within the industry. While backers framed the film as innovation, critics argue it risks erasing the role of human storytellers in cinema.
Anurag Kashyap, known for outspoken views, voiced his anger on Instagram after the poster launch. Addressing Subramaniam directly, he wrote:
“Here is the man heading an agency representing artists, writers and directors, now producing a film made by AI. End of the day, all these agencies are only interested in making money off you. Any actor or anyone who calls themselves artists and has a spine should be questioning him or leaving the agency.”
The filmmaker went further, describing the project as “the future for the spineless and cowardly so-called artists in the Hindi film industry.” His remarks reflect wider concerns that agencies profit from talent while backing projects that remove creative workers from the process.
Kashyap has previously worked on films tackling issues of power, exploitation and authenticity in cinema. His latest outburst adds to growing resistance against AI in filmmaking.
Kashyap was not alone in condemning the move. Director Vikramaditya Motwane, who recently explored AI themes in his project CTRL, reposted the announcement on Instagram with the blunt caption: “And so it begins. Who TF needs writers and directors when it’s ‘Made in AI’?”
Motwane’s reaction highlights a fear shared by many in the industry: that studios may prioritise cost-cutting AI tools over human creativity. His remarks echo discontent following Raanjhanaa’s AI-altered ending, which led to protests from Aanand L Rai’s team.
The Chiranjeevi Hanuman backlash has therefore become symbolic of a larger struggle, of filmmakers fighting to safeguard artistic integrity in an era of technological disruption.
Filmmaker Vikramaditya Motwane criticised the AI project and warned of the threat to writers and directors Instagram Screengrab/motwayne
What has the producer said in defence of AI films?
Vijay Subramaniam, head of Collective Artists Network and producer of Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal, defended the film at its launch. He argued that the project is not replacing tradition but enhancing it, describing it as “a unique opportunity to reimagine cultural storytelling for audiences who value both heritage and innovation.”
Supporters of the film insist that AI technology can make epic stories more accessible and visually ambitious without the usual budget constraints. Yet the criticism from Kashyap and Motwane shows strong resistance within Bollywood towards projects perceived as sidelining human talent.
The debate reflects a broader global conversation on AI’s role in creative industries, from Hollywood writers’ strikes to controversies in Indian cinema. With Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal set for release in 2026, the clash between technological innovation and artistic integrity is likely to intensify.