India's premier off-spinner Ravi Ashwin has revealed that he felt like he was being "thrown under the bus" after a remark by former head coach Ravi Shastri left him "crushed" during a torrid phase in his career when he contemplated retirement multiple times.
In an interview with ESPNcricinfo, Ashwin was asked how he felt when then-coach Shastri hailed Kuldeep Yadav as "India's No 1 overseas spinner" after the younger bowler had taken a five-for in the 2019 Sydney Test against Australia.
Shastri also said that "there is a time for everyone", which was then perceived to be a dig at Ashwin's career.
Ashwin said he was genuinely happy for Kuldeep as he knew how difficult it is to take five wickets as a spinner in Australia but Shastri's remarks left him "absolutely crushed".
"I hold Ravi bhai in high esteem. We all do. And I understand we all can say things and then retract them. In that moment, though, I felt crushed. Absolutely crushed," Ashwin said.
"We all talk about how important it is to enjoy your teammates' success. And I was happy for Kuldeep. I have not been able to get a five-for but he has a five-for in Australia. I know how big it is.
"But if I have to come and partake in his happiness, and the success of the team, I must feel like I belong there. If I feel like I am being thrown under the bus, how am I supposed to get up and come for a party to enjoy the team's or teammate's success?"
Ashwin, however, still made it to the celebration party that was organised following the Indian's team's historic series triumph Down Under.
"I went back to my room and then I spoke to my wife. And my children were there. So we were able to, you know, shrug it off, and I still made it to the party, because, end of the day, we had won a massive series."
The 35-year-old said that recurring injuries meant that he was playing under "excruciating pain" when he took three wickets in each innings to lead India to victory in the first Test.
Shastri's remark was quite too much for Ashwin after he played a role in the team's win in the series opener.
"The first Test seemed like a distant memory by then. I had taken three of the first four wickets in the first innings after we were bowled out cheaply, and then when it got really flat in the final innings, I plugged away for 50-plus overs and took three wickets despite what turned out to be a grade three abdomen tear.
"In my mind, I had done something great for the team in excruciating pain, but all I heard was, 'Nathan Lyon took six, Ashwin took three'.
"As it is, I was frustrated with my body for letting me down when I was in really good bowling form. The last thing I needed was these comparisons and insinuations. Between that reaction and Sydney, it didn't feel like I had played any part at all," Ashwin said.
Ashwin has been a great asset for India in both home and away conditions in the longer format of the game.
The spinner has so far taken 427 Test wickets, making him the third-highest wicket-taker from the country after Anil Kumble and Kapil Dev in the red-ball format.
But there was a phase between 2018 and 2020 when he almost quit playing.
"Between 2018 and 2020, I contemplated giving up the sport at various points. I thought, 'I have put in a lot of effort, but it is not coming through.'
"The harder I tried, the farther it felt. Especially with athletic pubalgia and the patellar tendonitis—I used to bowl six balls and then I used to be gasping for breath. And there would be pain all over the place.
"So you needed to make adjustments. When the knee pain got excruciating, the next ball I would probably jump less. When I jumped less, obviously the force needs to be produced through the core and the back and the shoulders, so the pubalgia (a chronic groin lesion) would act up.
"So the third ball I would be extra side-on to try to use the hips. By the time I was done with six balls, I would be like, 'I need a break here'," Ashwin recalled.
He also said that an injury breakdown in overseas assignments is often sneered at by the game's observers, an attitude that reflects the lack of empathy in the cricketing community.
"Only when it hits them personally do they have the empathy. Empathy is being able to put yourself in others' shoes, and feel, 'Hey what if it happens to me?' I feel as a cricketing community, we lack that," he lamented.
The re-release of Khaleja in 4K was supposed to be a nostalgic celebration for Mahesh Babu fans, but in Vijayawada, things got out of hand when one fan turned a tribute into a real-life stunt.
In an attempt to mirror a well-known scene from the film, where Mahesh Babu’s character walks with a snake through the desert, a fan decided to bring an actual snake into the cinema. At first, the crowd thought it was just a prop. But when the snake began to move, panic broke out. The video of the incident quickly made its way online, with shocked viewers sharing it widely.
— (@)
While theatres across cities filled with fans celebrating the film’s return, complete with posters, dances, and fireworks, this incident sparked concern about how far fan enthusiasm should go. Theatre staff had to escort the person out before the situation worsened.
Released in 2010 and directed by Trivikram Srinivas, Khaleja had a slow start at the box office but eventually earned cult status. It co-starred Anushka Shetty and told the story of a taxi driver who finds himself caught up in a divine mission.
Mahesh Babu’s cult film Khaleja sees packed theatres during re-releaseTwitter/Amalapuram Mahesh FC
The re-release, now upgraded to 4K with Dolby Atmos sound, was one of the biggest for any Telugu film. Ticket sales before the premiere crossed £330,000 (₹3.5 crore) in India, with nearly 200,000 tickets sold on BookMyShow alone. Even in the US, advance collections reportedly hit £40,000 (₹43 lakh), prompting additional shows in multiple cities.
However, not everything went smoothly. Fans noticed that certain scenes and songs were missing from the new version, leading to outrage in some theatres. Videos showed audiences arguing with projectionists and halting screenings in protest. Missing sequences like the “Sunday Monday” song and popular dialogues led to frustration, with many venting their anger online.
— (@)
The response to Khaleja’s re-release shows the deep attachment fans have to the film, but also raises questions about where to draw the line between celebration and chaos. Whether it’s re-enacting a scene or demanding every frame be restored, the film clearly still strikes a chord 14 years after its release.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started reducing troop numbers. (Photo: Reuters)
PAKISTAN and India are close to reducing troop levels along their border to those before the latest conflict began earlier this month, a senior Pakistani military official told Reuters on Friday. He cautioned, however, that the recent fighting had raised the risk of escalation in the future.
Both sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery in four days of clashes before a ceasefire was announced.
The fighting began after an attack in Indian Kashmir on April 22 that killed 26 people, most of them tourists. New Delhi blamed the attack on "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge denied by Islamabad.
On May 7, India launched missiles at what it said were "terrorist infrastructure" sites across the border. Pakistan responded with its own attacks, and both countries increased their troop presence along the frontier.
General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started reducing troop numbers.
"We have almost come back to the pre-22nd April situation... we are approaching that, or we must have approached that by now," said Mirza, the most senior Pakistani military official to speak publicly since the conflict.
India's ministry of defence and the office of the Indian chief of defence staff did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on Mirza's remarks.
Speaking in Singapore at the Shangri-La Dialogue forum, Mirza said there was no move towards nuclear weapons during this conflict, but it was a dangerous situation.
"Nothing happened this time," he said. "But you can't rule out any strategic miscalculation at any time, because when the crisis is on, the responses are different."
He said the risk of escalation in the future had grown, as the fighting this time was not limited to Kashmir. Both sides attacked military installations in their mainlands, but neither has acknowledged any serious damage.
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan this month that New Delhi would target "terrorist hideouts" again if there were new attacks on India.
'Dangerous trend'
India blames Pakistan for an insurgency in its part of Kashmir that began in 1989 and has killed tens of thousands. Pakistan says it provides only moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiris seeking self-determination.
"This (conflict) lowers the threshold between two countries who are contiguous nuclear powers... in the future, it will not be restricted to the disputed territory. It would come down to (the) whole of India and (the) whole of Pakistan," Mirza said. "This is a very dangerous trend."
Reuters has reported that the rapid escalation of hostilities ended in part because of behind-the-scenes diplomacy involving the US, India and Pakistan, and the key role played by Washington in brokering peace. India has denied any third-party role in the ceasefire and said that any engagement between India and Pakistan has to be bilateral.
Mirza said international mediation might be more difficult in the future because of a lack of crisis management mechanisms between the two countries.
"The time window for the international community to intervene would now be very less, and I would say that damage and destruction may take place even before that time window is exploited by the international community," he said.
He said Pakistan was open to dialogue, but apart from a crisis hotline between the directors general of military operations and some hotlines at the tactical level on the border, there was no other communication between the two countries.
New Delhi has maintained a hard line on any possible talks.
“If there are talks, it will only be on terrorism and (Pakistan Kashmir)," Indian defence minister Rajnath Singh said on Friday. "If Pakistan is serious about talks, it should hand over terrorists... to India so that justice is served.”
Mirza said there were no backchannel discussions or informal talks to ease tensions. He also said he had no plans to meet General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defence staff, who is also in Singapore for the forum.
"These issues can only be resolved by dialogue and consultations, on the table. They cannot be resolved on the battlefield," Mirza said.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Fans speculate online about what’s next for Ethan Hunt after The Final Reckoning
Despite its title’s finality, Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning doesn’t quite feel like the end. From cast comments to intense fan theories, there’s plenty of evidence suggesting Ethan Hunt’s story might still have more chapters to come. Let’s break down five clues that show Paramount may not be done with this franchise just yet.
1.Cast members are planting seeds for what’s next
When seasoned actors start dropping subtle hints, they usually know more than they’re letting on.
Angela Bassett, who returns as President Erika Sloane, teased: “With Mr Cruise, you can never count him down or out. He’s always up for an amazing adventure and to give the audience exactly what they’re craving.” Far from a goodbye, her words sound more like a promise.
Simon Pegg, who plays fan-favourite Benji Dunn, added with a grin: “Never say never... I don’t think Tom likes the idea of finality. Even if there isn’t anything after this, you leave the theatre feeling like, ‘Oh, maybe there’s more.’”
That “maybe” isn’t just casual. It reflects the essence of Mission: Impossible: it keeps moving, keeps reinventing, and its core cast knows it.
Hayley Atwell, the newest face in the spy squad as Grace, pointed out that while the movie brings a sense of closure, Cruise himself “won’t ever stop.” Let’s be honest: when actors speak this openly, it’s hard not to read between the lines.
Tom Cruise performing one of his stunts for Mission Impossible The Final ReckoningInstagram/missionimpossible
2.Box office numbers that practically demand a sequel
Let’s talk numbers. The Final Reckoning blasted into cinemas with the biggest opening in the franchise: £49.6 million (₹526 crore) in the US and a jaw-dropping £178.7 million (₹1,897 crore) globally. Not bad for the eighth film in a 30-year-old series, right?
It tied with Lilo & Stitch for the highest Memorial Day weekend box office in 2025. And with a budget rumoured to be between £236 million–£315 million (₹2,500–₹3,340 crore), Paramount will want to keep that cash flow going.
Audiences are still flocking to theatres for the wild stunts and international intrigue. And when a film this deep into a franchise still turns heads and fills seats, it’s not the end, it’s momentum.
Reddit theories suggest the Mission Impossible story is far from overInstagram/missionimpossible
3.Unresolved threads that beg for a follow-up
Sure, some arcs are wrapped up: Gabriel is gone, the Entity seems neutralised, and Ethan Hunt gets a rare moment of peace. But don’t let the surface fool you.
The final shot shows Hunt holding the drive that stores the Entity, a tech relic that could cause chaos down the road. That alone feels like a ticking time bomb waiting to be used again.
And then there’s Theo Degas and Paris, who were introduced late in the film but already feel like key team players. These aren’t mere throwaway roles; they could be possible leads for the next generation.
Even the recurring line, “Nothing is written,” feels like the movie winking at us reminding us that this world isn’t finished just yet.
Clues from the cast spark rumours of a possible sequel or spin-offInstagram/missionimpossible
4.Cruise and McQuarrie: a team that’s not done yet
Tom Cruise and director Christopher McQuarrie have built a creative partnership that’s nearly as iconic as the stunts in the films.
When asked if they’re done, McQuarrie joked about needing “a very long vacation” and not retirement. Cruise, ever cryptic, said at Cannes: “This is thirty years of culmination… but I’d rather people just see it and enjoy.” Again, no clear goodbye, just celebration.
The movie even plays with the idea of algorithm-driven storytelling, hinting that Cruise and McQuarrie are aware of how predictable franchises can become. But these two thrive on risk and reinvention and if anyone can dodge stagnation, it’s them.
Director Christopher McQuarrie and Tom Cruise during a behind the scenes moment from the filmInstagram/missionimpossible
5.Fandom energy that refuses to fade
Fan response to The Final Reckoning has been unbelievable. Test screenings reportedly caused one viewer to nearly “suffocate” from tension. Yes, really.
Reddit is flooded with theories, debates, and character deep-dives, from who might take over the IMF to whether Paris or Degas gets a bigger arc. The conversation isn’t stopping any time soon.
TikTok and Instagram Reels are flooded with fan edits, stunt breakdowns, and speculation videos. In its first week, the finale sparked over a million TikTok posts. That kind of viral traction doesn’t go unnoticed especially by a studio like Paramount.
The Final Reckoning is Verified Hot at 93% on the PopcornmeterInstagram/missionimpossible
Bonus clue: Spin-off buzz is already in the air
Beyond Ethan’s story, there’s chatter about side projects. A Benji-led mission? A Degas backstory? Maybe even an IMF series diving into the crew behind the curtain.
No, these aren’t just fan dreams. In fact, they’re being tossed around at Paramount meetings. And if done right, they could keep the franchise alive in exciting new ways.
When your stars hint at more, your box office breaks records, and your fans won’t stop talking, it’s clear: this franchise isn’t done.
Paramount has every reason to keep Ethan Hunt in action. And knowing Tom Cruise, he won’t bow out until every possible stunt has been attempted.
So, while The Final Reckoning might close one chapter, don’t be surprised if the next mission is already being planned. After all, in this world, nothing is truly final.
Keep ReadingShow less
The legal proceedings are ongoing and no trial date has yet been set
Actor and director Kevin Costner is facing a lawsuit filed by stuntwoman Devyn LaBella, who alleges she was subjected to an unscripted and violent simulated rape scene during the filming of Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 2. The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, names Costner, 70, along with production companies associated with the film, as defendants.
LaBella, 34, served as a stunt double for actress Ella Hunt and had performed various scenes for the Western film. According to the lawsuit, while one planned sexual assault scene had been properly choreographed and conducted with rehearsals and an intimacy coordinator on set, a separate scene allegedly took place the following day under very different circumstances.
LaBella claims that without prior notice or preparation, she was instructed by Costner to participate in an unplanned and graphic scene. The lawsuit alleges that Costner directed another actor to pin her down on a wagon and simulate a rape. No warning, rehearsal or clear signals were reportedly given about when the camera was rolling or when the scene had ended.
“The impact of this impromptu work demand on Ms LaBella has been profound,” the lawsuit states, adding that the experience caused her lasting trauma and disrupted her career in the stunt industry. The filing describes her response as one of helplessness, stating, “There was no escaping the situation, and all Ms LaBella could do was wait for the nightmare to end.”
LaBella’s legal representative, Kate McFarlane, described the situation as a “clear example of male-dominated, sexist Hollywood movie production”, and claimed that her client had been left unprotected from “brutal sexual conduct”.
The lawsuit alleges that standard safety protocols, union agreements, and industry practices were ignored during the filming of the second scene. It also states that in the weeks following the alleged incident, LaBella continued to experience emotional distress, including “sudden bouts of crying on and off set”, and feelings of “shame, humiliation and complete lack of control”.
LaBella is seeking financial damages, the amount of which will be determined at trial. She is also requesting a court order requiring the defendants to undergo sexual harassment training, use intimacy coordinators in future productions, and issue her a public apology.
Kevin Costner, through his lawyer Marty Singer, has denied the allegations. Singer described LaBella as a “serial accuser” and called her claims “completely contradicted by her open actions and the facts”. He said LaBella had consented to the scene in question, was fully informed about it in advance, and had given a ‘thumbs up’ after rehearsing with the actor involved.
According to Singer, the scene was never actually filmed, and LaBella continued to work on the film for several weeks following the alleged incident. He added that LaBella had dinner with her supervisor and stunt coordinators after the scene and appeared to be in good spirits with no complaints raised. After wrapping up her work on the film, she reportedly took her stunt coordinator to a thank-you dinner.
Singer rejected the claims outright, stating, “Her shake-down tactics won’t work in this case.”
LaBella, who has worked in the film industry since 2020 and is a former gymnast, has previously been involved in other stunt roles, though this is one of her most high-profile credits. Horizon: An American Saga is a multi-part film project directed by Costner, set in the American West.
The legal proceedings are ongoing and no trial date has yet been set.
Keep ReadingShow less
Crafted by Cartier in 1930, the tiara is being offered for public sale for the first time
A rare Cartier turquoise and diamond tiara once owned by Nancy Astor, the first woman to take a seat in the House of Commons, is set to go under the hammer in London next month, with expectations it could sell for as much as £350,000.
The American-born politician, who represented Plymouth Sutton from 1919 to 1945, wore the striking tiara at high-profile events, including the 1931 film premiere of City Lights at the Dominion Theatre in London. Auction house Bonhams described the piece as “exceptionally rare” and cited its “impeccable provenance” as a key factor in its anticipated high value.
Crafted by Cartier in 1930, the tiara is being offered for public sale for the first time. It was originally purchased by Astor’s husband, Lord Waldorf Astor, 2nd Viscount Astor, also American-born, who gave it to her during their marriage.
Jean Ghika, global head of jewellery at Bonhams, said the tiara dates from a period when Cartier London was “at the height of its creative prowess.” She added, “With impeccable provenance and a compelling marriage of Western and Eastern influences in the design, the tiara is exceptionally rare. We are honoured to have the opportunity to present it for sale for the first time in nearly a century.”
The tiara features single, rose-cut and brilliant-cut diamonds, and three fluted turquoise plumes set with diamond stems – a style reflecting Cartier’s Art Deco aesthetic of the time.
Nancy Astor, born Nancy Witcher Langhorne in Danville, Virginia, in 1879, moved to England in 1905 and met Waldorf Astor on a transatlantic voyage the same year. The couple married in 1906 and had five children. In 1919, when her husband was elevated to the peerage and moved to the House of Lords, Nancy Astor stood for election and won his vacated seat in the House of Commons, becoming the first woman to take up her position as an MP.
During her 26 years in Parliament, Lady Astor was a prominent advocate for women’s rights. She was instrumental in the passing of the Intoxicating Liquor (Sale to Persons Under 18) Act 1923, known as “Lady Astor’s Bill”, which raised the legal drinking age from 14 to 18. She also supported the Equal Franchise Act of 1928, which equalised the voting age for men and women, reducing the female voting age from 30 to 21.
Astor was re-elected seven times before retiring from political life in 1945. However, her legacy remains mixed. Campaigners have criticised her for alleged anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic views, and some have accused her of sympathising with Nazi Germany. Supporters, however, argue that she was a target of misogyny and that her views have been misrepresented, pointing to evidence that she opposed Nazism.
Lady Astor died in 1964 at the age of 84 at her home in Lincolnshire.
The auction of her tiara will take place at Bonhams in New Bond Street, London, on 5 June. The lot is expected to fetch between £250,000 and £350,000.
Timothée Chalamet and Kylie Jenner spark buzz with courtside PDA at Knicks game