Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

A matter of choice

by PRIYA MULJI

IN LIFE you have to make decisions every single day. When there is an important crossroads, a key moment or a crisis, the choices we make become even more important.


The current Covid-19 crisis and subsequent lockdown is one of those moments in life where decisions take on an added importance. At the top of this list is, of course, following the various social distancing guidelines and staying safe, but the choices we make lower down can be crucial, including in relationships.

Those who look honestly at their actions during this suffocating self-isolation can likely divide what they have done into two columns of good and bad decisions. Stocking up on essentials, staying calm, looking after your health, staying connected virtually to loved ones and showing kindness are some of the things that would fall into the good list. Not following safety guidelines, hoarding, worrying, getting lost in negative thoughts, not sleeping properly, having unhealthy habits and not making an effort with loved ones would go into the bad column.

Getting in touch with an ex would also be near the top of the list in the bad decisions column and would be written in capital letters. Many, especially single people, will have had added time alone and this would have triggered thoughts of that ex. Instead of remembering what tore them apart, they will think of the good things and be tempted to get in touch with the ex. Don’t do it! Taking a step backwards is never the answer.

Appreciate what you have now and look forward to something better. If an ex partner has got in touch with you out of the blue, don’t respond. The right person will make you forget about what was left behind and take you forward towards a much better tomorrow. They will give you the kind of unconditional love and support that wasn’t there before, and demonstrate quite comprehensively that you don’t need second best or less than you deserve in life.

The lockdown is tough, but taking a step back will never be the answer. Look forward to a better tomorrow and have hope in your heart. We are heading towards a different world, but I am sure it will be one that will have more compassion and a place where we appreciate our blessings more. Those who are in relationships will cherish one another more and the singletons will meet that someone special, who is waiting for them outside the lockdown.

It will be a world, where we will all make much better choices in all aspects of life, including work, family, friends and love. And if you have made some bad choices in the past, it is okay, we all have.

The important thing is to learn from any wrong turns and make better decisions going forward.

Follow Priya Mulji on www.twitter.com/priyamulji or log onto www.priyamulji.com

More For You

Shabana Mahmood’s hard line on asylum risks repeating Tory failures

Mahmood's plans are uncannily similar to Priti Patel’s new asylum law in 2022

Getty Images

Shabana Mahmood’s hard line on asylum risks repeating Tory failures

Shabana Mahmood is already the third British Asian woman to be a home secretary talking tough on asylum. That shows how much ethnic diversity in high office has accelerated. No Asian woman had ever been an MP before Mahmood and Priti Patel were elected in May 2010. But that Mahmood is so closely following Patel’s agenda now casts doubt on how far the Labour government’s new asylum proposals can deliver control in the Channel or rebuild public confidence in the system.

Mahmood’s core mission is to grip the asylum issue: she declares her reforms to be the most significant since the 1950s. Yet, they are uncannily similar to Priti Patel’s new asylum law in 2022 – which also proposed asylum seekers getting only 30 months of temporary protection. Suella Braverman then went even further – pledging that no asylum claims would get heard at all. By memory-holing these efforts, Mahmood misses crucial lessons of why they failed. If “pull factors” of the UK asylum design were the key to small boat arrivals, Patel and Braverman would have stopped the boats before the election.

Keep ReadingShow less