Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Why the UK police force fails to improve diversity

Why the UK police force fails to improve diversity

THERE is a popular saying that madness is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result to materialise.

The police in Britain have failed to reflect the diversity of the community they serve and have failed on Sir Robert Peel’s founding description of policing, which was, “the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.”


What is going wrong and what can the police do? The Home Affairs Select Committee Report  released last Friday (30) on race and policing focuses on evidence and the lack of progress and pulls no punches. It has been 22 years since the Macpherson report into why the white murders of Stephen Lawrence were not identified and prosecuted, with the blame down to “institutional racism”.

The police continue to rely on strategy, but fail to deliver effective action plans and bring about a change. The Black Lives Matter has added to the scrutiny police in England and Wales are receiving and their record on race examined.

No longer will warm words be sufficient; results are what communities demand. The police hierarchy, as well as the Home Office, are serial recipients of improvement reports on race and police, among them the Scarman Inquiry,the Morris Report, the CRE Report, the Macpherson Report, the Lammy Report.

Each and every time the reports say the same thing – the key metrics on recruitment, promotion, retention, stop and search, discipline are disproportionate against people of colour.

LEAD Comment Dal Babu Dalwardin Babu byline pic DAL BABU OBE

When challenged, the police will wring their hands and say that race is a priority. Martin Hewitt of the National Council of Chief Officers said, “Our policing style is based on legitimacy and our legitimacy is based on the trust and confidence of all communities.

“It is a fact that the trust and confidence levels within the black community are 20 per cent, or thereabouts, lower than the white communities, and that impacted on the trust and confidence for us to do what we do as a service.”

He goes onto to say, “So that means trust and confidence in terms of when we’re out and about, doing policing out on the streets and policing communities, as we need all our communities to have that trust and confidence.

“It’s only with that trust and confidence and legitimacy that people come forward, people report crimes, people become witnesses, people work with us, and … that trust and confidence leads to young black men and women saying, ‘I’m prepared to go and become a police officer.’”

So will this latest report make any difference or will we see the latest Home Office Select Committee report gather dust?

I gave evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee in 2016 and made a number of recommendations, including holding individual chief constables to account, national performance objectives on race and equality and regular scrutiny by the Home Affairs Select Committee on race and diversity progress by the police.

My recommendations were based on my lived experience of the police leaders who were paying lip service to diversity, but rarely acting. That is why I suggested that police leaders were personally held to account and the progress or lack of it scrutinised by parliament in my recommendations.

Sadly, there was no political will or indeed police leadership desire to introduce measures that would work. The most disturbing result is that confidence in policing continues to wane in black and Asian communities; with a gap of 20 per cent between white and ethnic minority communities.

It was no surprise my recommendations were not implemented; instead, we have another report.

Unfortunately, successive home secretaries, chief constables and more recently police and crime commissioners have paid mere lip service to race and policing, but remained silent on the results.

It is only when we see leaders removed for their diversity failure will we see results. Despite these failures, however, damehoods and knighthoods are lavished on these failing organisations. I will leave you with an example of why I feel pessimistic.

The National Crime Agency – the UK’s answer to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the US – was set up in 2013 and had the chance to reflect diversity right from the start.

Today, only one of the 15 senior leaders is from an ethnic minority background.

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less