Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Why Aldi and Lidl could soon face the same competition rules as Tesco and Asda

The UK's competition watchdog believes the two discount giants have grown large enough to be treated like the country's biggest supermarket chains

UK Supermarkets

The UK's competition watchdog wants Aldi and Lidl to follow the same land rules as the country's biggest supermarket chains

AFP via Getty Images
  • CMA proposes bringing Aldi and Lidl under the UK's Controlled Land Order.
  • The move aims to stop major supermarkets from restricting rival stores nearby.
  • Aldi says the proposal will not affect its UK expansion plans, while Lidl says its growth strategy remains unchanged.

Aldi and Lidl could soon be brought under the same competition rules that already apply to Britain's biggest supermarket chains, as the UK competition watchdog moves to strengthen rules designed to protect consumer choice.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has provisionally proposed extending the Controlled Land Order to Aldi, Lidl GB and Lidl NI. If approved, the move would prevent the German discount retailers from using land agreements that could stop rival supermarkets from opening stores nearby.


The rules were introduced in 2010 to stop large grocery retailers from limiting competition through restrictive land agreements, such as exclusivity clauses or restrictive covenants. These agreements can make it difficult for competing supermarkets to secure nearby sites, reducing shoppers' choices in a local area.

The restrictions currently apply to seven supermarket groups: Asda, Co-op, Marks & Spencer, Morrisons, Sainsbury's, Tesco and Waitrose.

According to the CMA, Aldi and Lidl were not originally included because they operated smaller stores with a more limited range of products. However, the regulator believes both retailers have changed significantly over the past decade by expanding their store networks and increasing the size and range of their outlets.

Growth brings greater responsibility

The proposal reflects the growing influence of the two discount chains in the UK grocery market. Recent Worldpanel figures show Aldi has become the UK's fourth-largest supermarket with a 10.8 per cent market share, while Lidl ranks sixth with 8.8 per cent. Both retailers have steadily expanded across the country, attracting shoppers with lower-priced groceries and opening hundreds of new stores.

The CMA is now seeking further feedback before making a final decision.

Juliette Enser, executive director of competition enforcement and markets at the CMA, reportedly said the proposal was intended to ensure shoppers continue to benefit from a wide choice of supermarkets and competitive prices. She added, as quoted in a news report, that applying the same rules to Aldi and Lidl would help create a level playing field across the grocery sector.

Aldi said the provisional decision would not affect its long-term plans to continue expanding across the UK. A company spokesperson reportedly said the retailer remained committed to opening hundreds of new stores.

Lidl also signalled that the proposal would not alter its expansion strategy. A spokesperson reportedly said the company had always welcomed competition and would continue opening new stores while bringing its products to more communities.

The CMA is expected to review responses from retailers and other stakeholders before deciding whether Aldi and Lidl should formally join the list of supermarkets covered by the Controlled Land Order.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Meta

A landmark ruling places child safety at the centre of the debate over social media accountability

Getty Images

US court hits Meta with another £421m over child safety failures, labels firm a ‘public nuisance’

  • Meta's total penalty in the New Mexico case has reached £700 million ($942 million).
  • A US judge likened the company's platforms to a factory creating public harm through its recommendation systems.
  • The ruling also orders sweeping changes to how Instagram and Facebook operate for users under 18.

Meta has been hit with another major legal setback after a judge in the US state of New Mexico ordered the company to pay £421 million ($567 million) over claims that its platforms failed to protect children from online harm. The latest order takes the company's total penalty in the case to £700 million ($942 million), making it the biggest financial punishment Meta has faced over child safety.

The case is drawing attention well beyond New Mexico because the court went a step further than simply imposing a fine. Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled that Meta's platforms amounted to a "public nuisance", comparing the company to a factory whose main product is advertising while the "pollution" is the psychological harm and sexual exploitation suffered by children, as quoted in a news report.

Keep ReadingShow less