Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

‘We remember them. All of them’

by TOM TUGENDHAT

Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee


AS WE all know, 2018 marks the centenary of the end of the First World War and commemorative events throughout the year have marked the occasion, to say thank you for the sacrifices of a generation across the world who gave their today for our tomorrow.

We owe a monumental debt of gratitude to all those who joined the war effort, which is why this weekend I will travel to Delhi to lay a wreath – not only to pay my own personal tribute, but also on behalf of our government – to the three million soldiers and labourers from across the Empire and the Commonwealth who fought and served alongside the British army during the First World War.

We often forget that in 1914, the German army and their allies did not just go to war with the British army but with the whole of the British Empire. When war was declared on August 4, 1914, the British army numbered just 700,000 soldiers. By the end of the war, after conscription was introduced, the Army has some four million officers and troops.

Yet even this was not enough to fight the world’s first truly global war – victory in the First World War is owed not only to these four million British soldiers but also the three million soldiers from all corners of the British Empire who fought on multiple fronts against the Germans and their allies.

I have always felt it is my duty – as a veteran and a member of parliament – to ensure that during our country’s annual commemorations of the Armistice, we remember not only our own war dead but also the sacrifices of those from across the Commonwealth who served in the cause of freedom.

To mark the centenary, like many of you, I have been wearing a khadi poppy, a hand-spun cotton poppy which was created by the Royal British Legion this year to honour the 1.5 million Indian troops and 10,000 nurses who served and worked abroad during the First World War.

The Indian Army fought the Germans and their allies in East Africa, the Ottomans in Mesopotamia and the Italians in both Galipoli and Egypt, with 11 of their troops winning Victoria Crosses for their bravery on the battlefield. Of the 1.5 million soldiers who went to war, 74,187 died and another 67,000 were wounded. The entire subcontinent also raised over £20 billion (in today’s money), sent 3.7 tonnes of supplies and provided 170,000 animals to the war effort. It is to commemorate this contribution and sacrifice that I proudly wear a khadi poppy.

Yet this weekend, 100 years on since church bells rang out across Europe to mark the end of the war, we will pause to remember not only India’s vast contribution to the British war effort but also the sacrifices of troops from across Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Caribbean.

On April 25 every year, we mark Anzac Day – the anniversary of the first military action seen by the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps in the First World War. More than 400,000 Australians served in the Australian Imperial Force during the war, alongside 100,000 soldiers from New Zealand who joined the New Zealand Expeditionary Force, including nearly 3,000 Maori and those from the Pacific Islands.

In the Caribbean, 12 battalions of the British West Indies Regiment worked as labourers in gun emplacements and ammunition dumps not only in France and Italy but also Africa and the Middle East. Alongside them were over 25,000 South Africans who served on the Western Front between 1916 and 1917. About 60,000 South African labourers also helped sustain the war effort, and in 1915, 67,000 South African troops invaded Namibia. Of the 3,153 South African officers and troops who fought in the Battle of the Somme, only 750 men remained uninjured after nearly a week of fighting.

Such devastating losses were reflected in the number of Canadian troops who died during the war, after the country’s troops played a pivotal role in the Hundred Days offensives of 1918. Around 10 per cent of the 620,000 Canadians who enlisted had been killed in action.

Meanwhile, by November 1918, the ‘British Army’ in East Africa was made up almost exclusively of African soldiers from countries including Malawi, Uganda, Kenya, Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone. These troops were supported by approximately 180,000 more civilians.

I am incredibly grateful and humbled to be able to lay a wreath in Delhi this weekend to pay tribute to the sacrifices of all those from undivided India in the First World War effort. And it is with pride that I will wear the khadi poppy on Sunday, as a mark of profound respect to all those from India and across the Commonwealth, who fought and died alongside the British army to guarantee the freedom we enjoy today. It is not just the British army we must remember, but the armies of the British Empire.

More For You

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less
If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

Portraits of Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists, killed in Israel’s last Friday (13) attack, are seen above a road, as heavy smoke rises from an oil refinery in southern Teheran hit in an overnight Israeli strike last Sunday (15)

If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

THERE is one question to which none of us has the answer: if the ayatollahs are toppled, who will take over in Teheran?

I am surprised that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has lasted as long as he has. He is 86, and would achieve immortality as a “martyr” in the eyes of regime supporters if the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, succeeded in assassinating him. This was apparently Netanyahu’s plan, though he was apparently dissuaded by US president Donald Trump from going ahead with the killing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

A woman poses with a sign as members of the public queue to enter a council meeting during a protest calling for justice for victims of sexual abuse and grooming gangs, outside the council offices at City Centre on January 20, 2025 in Oldham, England

Getty Images

Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

WAS a national inquiry needed into so-called grooming gangs? Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer did not think so in January, but now accepts Dame Louise Casey’s recommendation to commission one.

The previous Conservative government – having held a seven-year national inquiry into child sexual abuse – started loudly championing a new national inquiry once it lost the power to call one. Casey explains why she changed her mind too after her four-month, rapid audit into actions taken and missed on group-based exploitation and abuse. A headline Casey theme is the ‘shying away’ from race.

Keep ReadingShow less