Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

US lawmakers urge Trump administration to not end India's trade privileges

Twenty-four US members of Congress sent a letter on Friday (3) to US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, urging him not to end a vital trade concession for India, a day before the Trump administration is likely to announce a decision on it.

Ending the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), which allows preferential duty-free imports of up to $5.6 billion from the South Asian nation, would impose "hundreds of millions of dollars annually in new taxes" on American companies, the lawmakers said in a bipartisan letter led by Democratic Representative Jim Himes from Connecticut.


"In the past, even temporary lapses in such benefits have caused companies to lay off workers, cut salaries and benefits, and delay or cancel job-creating investments in the United States," the letter says. They urged the administration to continue negotiating a deal with India that would protect American jobs.

A decision to scrap the trade privilege comes as president Donald Trump has vowed to cut the US trade deficit and repeatedly called out India for high tariffs.

India is the world's largest beneficiary of GSP, which dates from the 1970s, and ending its participation would not only be the strongest punitive action against the country since Trump took office, but would also open a new front in the global trade war.

The elimination of GSP is likely to bring retaliatory tariffs from New Delhi, according to a senior source with direct knowledge of the matter.

Last June, India said it would step up import duties varying from 20 per cent to 120 per cent on a slew of U.S. farm, steel and iron products, angered by Washington's refusal to exempt it from new steel and aluminum tariffs.

But it has since repeatedly delayed adopting the higher duties - a move that could be implemented if GSP is withdrawn, the source added.

India is hoping the decision to end the trade privilege is delayed and the Trump administration is open to further negotiations, the source said. In April, Republican Senator John Cornyn and Democratic Senator Mark Warner, co-chairs of the Senate India caucus, urged Lighthizer to delay adopting the plan.

India sent a trade package listing the concessions it was willing to make to the USTR in late February but hasn't heard from them, the source said.

"They are usually very responsive so it is highly unusual for them to not respond to the trade package that was sent," the source said.

The decision to drop GSP is also ill-timed as it comes in the middle of elections in India, hampering the country's ability to negotiate further, the source added.

Despite close political ties between the two countries, trade between India and the United States, which stood at $126 billion in 2017, is widely seen to be performing at nearly a quarter of its potential.

Trade relations suffered in the past few months after India adopted new rules on e-commerce, reining in how US companies such as Amazon.com Inc and Walmart Inc can do business in the country.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

HMRC ompliance managers UK billionaires

HMRC is introducing dedicated tax managers and new analytical tools to strengthen compliance checks on wealthy individuals

iStock

UK billionaires face closer tax scrutiny as HMRC targets £500m in extra revenue

  • HMRC has identified more than 200 billionaires with a UK tax footprint for dedicated compliance management
  • The authority estimates the wealthy tax gap reached £3.6bn in 2024-25
  • New technology, including artificial intelligence, will help identify potential tax risks earlier

The UK tax authority is assigning dedicated customer compliance managers to more than 200 billionaires as part of a drive to collect at least £500 million in additional revenue from wealthy taxpayers.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said it had compiled a list of billionaires with UK tax obligations for the first time, regardless of whether they formally live in the country. The move is intended to address a gap between the tax wealthy individuals should pay and what the authority actually collects.

Keep ReadingShow less