Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

UK's Tetley Reveals Tea Suppliers In Push For Slave-free Sourcing

Tetley, the world's second biggest tea company, has released a list of its suppliers, including those in India, to boost transparency in its supply chain, the British firm's owner Tata Global Beverages said on Friday (2).

India's tea industry, the second largest in the world, employs 3.5 million workers, many of whom are exploited on plantations and live in poverty, research has shown.


Tetley sources most of its tea from India, with 141 suppliers of a total 227 named in the list published last week.

Major brands are facing mounting regulatory and consumer pressure to ensure their products are free of slavery and other abusive practices.

"The information has been put up in response to changing consumer expectations in the UK, regarding transparency in the supply chain," a spokesperson for Tata Global Beverages told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in an emailed statement.

The company declined to say whether its Indian subsidiaries would also follow this practice and publish suppliers' lists.

Tetley became the third major British tea company after Yorkshire Tea owner Bettys and Taylors Group and Twinings to publish a full list of suppliers.

Some Indian plantations certified as slavery-free are nonetheless abusing and underpaying their workers, according to research by Britain's Sheffield University.

Many women working on plantations in the northeastern Indian state of Assam, where major brands source much of their tea, earn a "pitiful" $2 a day and live in "appalling" conditions, found a report from British charity Traidcraft Exchange in May.

Estate owners often cite the benefits they are legally required to provide, which include housing, toilets, health facilities and subsidised food, to justify low wages.

But workers complain repeated requests for repairs and better food supplies - often insufficient, stale or contaminated - are largely ignored, according to the report.

Tata Global Beverages says it works to ensure all its suppliers meet ethical standards and follows a strict code of conduct to "ensure slavery and human trafficking is not taking place anywhere in our supply chains".

The Kolkata-based company aims to launch a new supplier code of conduct next year.

Campaigners said Tetley's move would help improve conditions but cautioned it would not be enough to ensure all tea plantation workers got a fair deal.

"(The list) must then be accompanied by meaningful dialogue with workers to properly address the risks they identify," said Joe Bardwell, a spokesman for the British-based Business and Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC).

Reuters

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Musk's SpaceX-Tesla merger
Elon Musk
Getty Images

What could a SpaceX-Tesla merger mean for Tesla and its investors?

  • SpaceX and Tesla have formed independent committees to explore a possible merger, with Musk saying the idea has merit but is not certain to happen.
  • A combined business could bring electric vehicles, rockets, satellites, AI and robotics under one corporate roof, but investors would need to assess how the deal is structured and priced.
  • Tesla shareholders would face a major decision over whether the potential benefits justify the risks of joining a much broader business empire.

Elon Musk’s proposal to combine SpaceX and Tesla could reshape the electric carmaker’s future, giving it closer access to rocket technology, satellite connectivity and artificial intelligence infrastructure. But for Tesla investors, the central question is whether the merger would create lasting value or expose the company to new financial and governance risks.

Musk said on Tuesday (20) that both companies had established special committees of independent directors to examine a possible tie-up. He supports the idea, citing opportunities to cooperate on AI software, chip design, robotics and connectivity. However, he cautioned investors against treating a merger as inevitable. The committees have yet to agree on transaction terms, and any proposal would need shareholder approval.

Keep ReadingShow less