Johnson backs Patel over bullying report; adviser quits


FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks with Home Secretary, Priti Patel aboard a security vessel at the Port of Southampton, Britain December 2, 2019.  (Photo by Hannah McKay - WPA Pool/Getty Images)
FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks with Home Secretary, Priti Patel aboard a security vessel at the Port of Southampton, Britain December 2, 2019. (Photo by Hannah McKay - WPA Pool/Getty Images)

PRIME MINISTER Boris Johnson today (20) backed the home secretary, Priti Patel, after a damning inquiry into allegations that she bullied her staff concluded she had broken rules, including shouting and swearing at them.



Johnson’s defence of Patel prompted the author of the report, independent adviser Alex Allan, to resign.

Patel had not met the standards set under the ministerial code which states ministers should treat officials with respect, Allan had concluded. Ministers usually step down if they are found to be in breach of the code.

Patel said she was sorry if ‘she had upset people’.



“I am sorry that my behaviour in the past has upset people. It has never been my intention to cause upset to anyone,” she said in a statement. “I am very grateful for the hard work of thousands of civil servants who help to deliver the government’s agenda.”

Patel thanked the prime minister for his support after he judged she had not broken the ministerial code.

“I acknowledge that I am direct and have at times got frustrated,” she said. “I would like to thank the prime minister for his support.”



A government statement said Johnson judged the code had not been breached, saying that concerns had not been raised at the time and that Patel was unaware of the impact of her actions.

“The prime minister has full confidence in the home secretary and considers this matter now closed,” the statement said.

The issue comes at a difficult time for Johnson, who is trying to reset his government after his top adviser Dominic Cummings left Downing Street last week. His leadership and judgment has also been called into question over his handling of the coronavirus pandemic.



Patel was a leading supporter of Brexit before the 2016 referendum and is popular in the ruling Conservative Party. The Home Office is responsible for crime, security and immigration where Patel has advocated a hardline stance.

The daughter of immigrants herself, she previously had to quit as aid minister in 2017 because she held undisclosed meetings with Israeli officials.​

Immediately after Johnson cleared Patel, Allan quit and opponents accused the prime minister of giving the green light to bullying.

Johnson himself had written in the foreword to the ministerial code’s latest version that “there must be no bullying and no harassment”.

“I recognise that it is for the prime minister to make a judgment on whether actions by a minister amount to a breach of the Ministerial Code,” Allan said. “But I feel that it is right that I should now resign from my position.”

Patel was accused of demeaning her staff, prompting Johnson to launch an inquiry in March to establish the facts.

In a summary of his advice, Allan found that Patel had become “justifiably in many instances” frustrated by her department’s lack of support, and this had “manifested itself in forceful expression, including some occasions of shouting and swearing”.

“Her approach on occasions has amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying in terms of the impact felt by individuals,” Allan’s advice said. “To that extent her behaviour has been in breach of the Ministerial Code, even if unintentionally.”

Patel said it had never been her intention to upset anyone. Colleagues rallied round her, describing her as kind and courteous.

However, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said he would have sacked her and demanded the report be published in full.

“Yet again, the prime minister has been found wanting when his leadership has been tested,” Starmer said in a statement. “It is hard to imagine another workplace in the UK where this behaviour would be condoned by those at the top.”