Taz Khan: "Feeding people is just the start, we must fix a broken system"
The founder of London’s Community Kitchen speaks about food security, British farming and the fight to restore dignity
Taz Khan (right) with King Charles III and Queen Camilla
By Mahesh LiloriyaAug 04, 2025
Taz Khan MBE is the driving force behind London’s Community Kitchen (LCK), one of the UK’s largest initiatives tackling food waste and hunger. Each week, LCK supports over 15,000 people, redistributing surplus food to those who need it most. His impact has earned national recognition — including a landmark visit from His Majesty King Charles III, who met volunteers and saw the project’s transformative work in action.
Eastern Eye: Taz, what inspired you to start London’s Community Kitchen?
Taz Khan MBE: It all started in 2014- not in a boardroom, but on the streets. I saw people, everyday Londoners, slipping through the cracks. I realised we weren’t just dealing with poverty; we were witnessing a collapse in community support, policy foresight, and human dignity. London’s Community Kitchen was born out of necessity, to rescue good food from waste and redirect it to those who needed it most.
EE: You've seen the worst and best of our food system. What stands out most to you?
TK: The extremes. On one hand, I’ve met heroic volunteers and local businesses who give with heart and soul. On the other, I’ve seen supermarkets throw out edible food while parents nearby skip meals to feed their children. That’s the moral crisis we’re dealing with... it’s not just food poverty, it’s a dignity deficit.
EE: How serious is Britain’s dependence on imported food?
TK: Critically serious. In 1989, we produced 67% of our food. Today, we import 42%, including a staggering 84% of our fruit and nearly half our vegetables. That makes us dangerously vulnerable to global shocks, whether it’s floods in Spain or geopolitical unrest. And yet, we continue to sideline our farmers.
EE: So how do we fix this?
TK: We need nothing short of a radical overhaul. The government must stop treating food and farming as afterthoughts. Instead of subsidising land to rewild, we must support farmers to grow food; healthy, sustainable, homegrown food. Let’s set real targets for self-sufficiency, provide direct investment in production, and revitalise local food ecosystems.
Taz Khan MBE
EE: What about the role of supermarkets and food policy?
TK: Supermarkets are gatekeepers. They control choice, pricing, access. We need them to stock more British produce, not just what’s profitable, but what sustains communities. Junk food dominates our shelves and screens, while only one in four major UK food companies even has a health-based sales target. That’s unacceptable.
EE: For many, food poverty remains invisible. What does it really look like?
TK: It looks like your colleague skipping lunch, your neighbour quietly using a food bank, your child’s friend coming to school hungry. Poverty isn’t just homelessness... it lives among us. And food insecurity is not just about empty stomachs, it’s about lost dignity, choice, and security.
EE: How do community projects fit into this?
TK: They’re vital. Every allotment planted, every cooking class offered, every child taught how to grow something, that’s empowerment. Community-supported agriculture, local food hubs, direct-to-consumer farming; these rebuild resilience and reconnect people with the food they eat.
EE: Do you believe this is still fixable?
TK: Absolutely. But only if we act now. We can’t afford to keep sleepwalking into deeper dependence. Food is culture, identity, security. It’s time to stop taking it, and the people who grow and deliver it, for granted.
Siddiq is accused of influencing her aunt’s administration to secure a plot of land in Purbachal, Dhaka, for her mother, brother, and sister. (Photo: Getty Images)
LABOUR MP Tulip Siddiq is scheduled to face trial in Bangladesh on August 11 over corruption allegations. The case is part of a wider investigation into the regime of her aunt, former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who was deposed last year.
Bangladesh’s Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) confirmed Siddiq’s case will be heard along with more than 20 others, including Hasina and family members.
If Siddiq does not attend, the trial will proceed in her absence, BBC reported.
She is accused of influencing her aunt’s administration to secure a plot of land in Purbachal, Dhaka, for her mother, brother, and sister.
Siddiq has denied the allegations, saying she has not been contacted by Bangladeshi authorities and does not own any land in Purbachal. Lawyers for Siddiq called the accusations “politically motivated” and a “smear campaign.”
Bangladesh issued an arrest warrant for Siddiq earlier this year. The ACC is also investigating her in a separate case over alleged embezzlement of £3.9bn linked to a 2013 nuclear power plant deal. Siddiq has denied involvement.
Siddiq resigned as UK treasury minister in January, saying staying on would be a “distraction,” while insisting she had done nothing wrong.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Far-right Britain First party co-leaders Paul Golding (front row CL) and Ashlea Simon (front row CR) lead supporters on an anti-immigration 'March for Remigration' calling for mass deportations, in Manchester, on August 2, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
FRESH clashes erupted at anti-immigration protests across the UK on Saturday, with police reporting several arrests.
In Manchester, demonstrators demanding mass "remigration" gathered for a march organised by the far-right group Britain First. They were met by anti-racism groups, leading to brief clashes before police separated the two sides, according to an AFP journalist at the scene.
"Send them back, don't let them in -- just stop them coming in, we've got hotels full of immigrants and we've got our own homeless people in the streets begging for food but nowhere to live," said protester Brendan O'Reilly, 66.
Counter-protester Judy, a 60-year-old retired nurse, said she joined the rally "because I don't want to see people full of hate on the streets of Manchester."
"Do they want them all to go back or is it just people with brown skin? I suspect it's just people with brown skin that they want to re-migrate," she added.
In London, rival groups gathered outside a hotel housing asylum seekers in the Barbican area. Clashes broke out before police intervened.
The Metropolitan Police said on X that officers cleared a junction where counter-protesters had assembled in breach of set conditions. "There have been nine arrests so far, with seven for breaching Public Order Act conditions," the force added.
Similar incidents have taken place across the UK in recent weeks, including in Epping, north-east London.
A MAN has been convicted of assaulting two police officers and a member of the public during a violent altercation at Manchester Airport, which was widely shared on social media last summer.
Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, from Rochdale, was found guilty at Liverpool Crown Court of attacking PC Lydia Ward, PC Ellie Cook and a bystander during the incident on July 23, 2024, reported the Times.
However, the jury could not reach a verdict on separate charges against him and his brother, Muhammad Amaad, 26, relating to an alleged assault on PC Zachary Marsden.
The Crown Prosecution Service is now considering whether to seek a retrial on the unresolved charges. The case centred on two confrontations—one at a Starbucks café inside Terminal 2, and the other in the airport car park.
The court heard that the Amaaz brothers had gone to the airport with their young nephew to pick up their mother, Shameem Akhtar, who had flown in from Pakistan. Akhtar claimed she had been racially abused and harassed on the flight by another passenger, Abdulkareem Ismaeil.
As the family passed the Starbucks around 8.20pm, Akhtar spotted Ismaeil inside. The brothers entered the café, where Amaaz headbutted and punched Ismaeil in front of his family. Amaaz later told the court that Ismaeil had been threatening him.
Shortly afterwards, police caught up with the family near the car park payment area. PC Marsden approached Amaaz to arrest him, but a struggle followed. The prosecution accused both brothers of attacking Marsden. The jury, however, could not agree on that charge.
Amaaz was convicted of punching both PC Cook and PC Ward, breaking Ward’s nose. Footage from police body cameras showed officers using force to subdue him, including a taser.
Marsden denied using excessive violence, claiming he had stamped his foot to retrieve his radio cable. Other footage captured an officer telling Amaad: “If you move, I will smash your f***ing face in.”
The defence argued that the brothers acted in self-defence after being grabbed by police without warning. Amaaz said he believed PC Marsden was going to “batter him to death”, while Amaad thought they were under attack.
Prosecutor Paul Greaney KC urged the jury to focus on the seriousness of the assault on officers, warning that Marsden had feared for his firearm being taken in an airport setting. Amaaz was remanded in custody ahead of a bail hearing.
Greater Manchester Police said they supported the jury’s verdicts and remain committed to any further proceedings. GMP Federation chair Mike Peake said the case highlighted the risks officers face:
“Thirty-five officers are assaulted every week in Greater Manchester. We are bloodied and bruised.”
Chief constable Sir Stephen Watson added, “While disappointed the full prosecution was not secured, we support a retrial and thank the jury for their work on this complex case.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Home secretary Yvette Cooper departs following a memorial service to mark the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 London Bombings at St Paul's Cathedral on July 07, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)
ENGLAND and Wales saw their second-largest population rise in 75 years, mostly due to high levels of immigration, according to new data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
Between mid-2023 and June 2024, the population increased by over 706,000 people, bringing the total to 61.8 million. Net migration — the number of people arriving minus those leaving — accounted for nearly all of that rise, with over 690,000 people added. Only about 30,000 of the growth came from natural change (more births than deaths).
This follows a larger rise the year before, when more than 821,000 people were added. That means the population grew by 1.5 million in just two years — the biggest two-year increase since records began in 1949.
However, more recent data shows net migration dropped sharply to 431,000 by the end of 2024, due to new visa restrictions. Fewer international students arrived, and more left after finishing their studies.
A ban on most students bringing family members also contributed. Rules were also tightened for foreign care workers, stopping them from bringing dependants, reported the Times.
The Labour government plans to go further. From next year, foreign graduates will only be allowed to stay for 18 months after their course ends, down from the current two years.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper blamed the previous Conservative government for letting immigration get out of control.
She said, “Under the Tories, overseas recruitment shot up while training in the UK was cut. Lower-skilled migration soared while the proportion of UK residents in work fell.”
She added that Labour had already introduced new immigration rules to bring numbers down, linking visa routes more closely with skills training in the UK.
But the Conservatives argued the Labour plans don’t go far enough. Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said: “Our population is growing at an unsustainable pace, almost entirely driven by record levels of immigration… Britain simply cannot plan or build fast enough to keep up.”
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called the figures “disastrous,” saying they put “impossible pressure” on public services and damage community life.
The ONS also found more people moved from England and Wales to Scotland and Northern Ireland than the other way around.
Dr Madeleine Sumption, from the University of Oxford’s Migration Observatory, said, “Migration is still the main reason for population growth — not because of births, but because migration remains high by historical standards.”
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: Members of the local Harrow community attend a memorial service for the victims of the crashed Air India flight and their families at the International Siddhashram Shakti Centre on June 14, 2025 in Harrow, England. (Photo by Jack Taylor/Getty Images)
BRITISH families awaiting the remains of relatives who were on board the London-bound Air India Flight 171, which crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad airport, are expecting confirmation on DNA matches following high-level government talks between India and the UK, their legal team has said.
Keystone Law, which has been working with aviation experts to assist many of the bereaved families following the June 12 crash, has this week called for urgency in the process.
During Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the UK last week, Downing Street confirmed that prime minister Keir Starmer raised the Air India tragedy during bilateral discussions, following UK media reports of alleged mislabelling of some remains repatriated to Britain.
“The UK and Indian governments have held high-level talks, as a result of the international media coverage of this problem,” said James Healy-Pratt, Aviation Partner at Keystone Law.
“It is believed that some matched DNA remains may now have been located in India. Confirmation is awaited.”
A total of 241 passengers and crew died in the disaster, including 52 British nationals. Of the 12 caskets that have been repatriated to the UK so far, two were found to be incorrectly identified.
India’s ministry of external affairs (MEA) responded to the reports, stating that “all mortal remains were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased.”
“We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue,” an MEA spokesperson said last month.
When asked to assess the scale of the problem, Keystone Law said that in a sample of 12 repatriated caskets, two were mislabelled, mishandled and misidentified.
“Extrapolated out – with an unacceptable error rate of 15 per cent – that would suggest around 40 sets of remains may have been mislabelled, mishandled, or misidentified. That is a known unknown, and many of the families’ loved ones have already been cremated,” said Healy-Pratt.
Last month, an inquest into the deaths of several British passengers was opened and adjourned in London. Under UK procedure, the identification process is being overseen by the Senior Coroner.
Meanwhile, a preliminary report by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) found that fuel supply to both engines appeared to have been cut off shortly after take-off. Though the engines attempted to restart, it was too late to prevent the Boeing 787 Dreamliner from crashing into B.J. Medical College in Ahmedabad, killing 19 people on the ground.
Keystone Law has also called for more clarity on the transition of fuel cut-off switches, as well as a clearer explanation of the voices heard in the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR).
“The Indian AAIB has this evidence, and for unexplained reasons has not shared these details with the families of AI 171,” said Healy-Pratt.
“The Indian AAIB cannot complain about speculation when the evidence in its possession is not shared transparently with the families.”
The aviation lawyer also urged transparency regarding reported plans for compensation being considered by the Tata Group, the owners of Air India.
“There is talk of TATA setting up a £47 million fund for the AI 171 families – which would provide ex gratia support (legally a gift and separate from any court-ordered compensation against Air India or Boeing) of at least Rs 10 million (£94,000) per victim,” he said.
“Families deserve to receive details of this support urgently, especially as legal proceedings take time in India, England, and the United States.”
The UK’s Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) holds "expert status" in the Indian safety investigation and has confirmed it is reviewing the findings of the preliminary report, which was released one month after the crash, on July 12.
The UK-based families have previously called for expert representation in the India-led investigation, to ensure greater transparency and accountability in the inquiry process.