Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Seedorf says punish players who cover their mouths to speak to opponents

Seedorf says punish players who cover their mouths to speak to opponents

IN a bid to curb racism on the football field, former Netherlands international Clarence Seedorf has a suggestion and said players who cover their mouths to speak to opponents or referees should be punished.

Slavia Prague defender Ondrej Kudela was banned for 10 matches by Uefa on Wednesday (14) after being found guilty of racist behaviour towards Rangers player Glen Kamara.


During a Europa League game on March 18, Kamara was incensed when Kudela whispered something in his ear. Kamara claimed Kudela called him a "f****** monkey", which Kudela had denied saying. Like what Seedorf had pointed out, Kudela had covered his mouth before talking to Kamara.

"I have seen stuff with players speaking and covering their mouth during matches," he said in an online event hosted by the Council of Europe.

"There were some racist situations in the last weeks or months where the players among themselves had hate speeches.

"Those things can be very easily attacked by implementing some rules. For me it should be abandoned to be able to speak like that when you approach an adversary.

"When we're talking about sport it has to be completely transparent, so why would I cover my mouth if I need to talk with my adversary?

"If I want to (cover my mouth to) talk to my coach or a team-mate, all fine, but when I approach the referee or another player in any sport, you are not allowed to cover your mouth, it has to be a sanction, a yellow card."

Not on the football field, even online racist abuse of footballers been a talking point lately. Former France and Arsenal legend Thierry Henry has suspended his social media accounts protesting online abuse of players and not much being done to address the issue.

More For You

 asylum seekers

The total bill for asylum hotels stands at £5.5 m a day, or £2.1 bn a year

Getty Images

Government considers £100 weekly payments to move asylum seekers out of hotels

Highlights

  • Asylum seekers could receive £100 per week on top of existing £49.18 support to leave hotels.
  • Currently over 32,000 migrants housed in 200 hotels costing £145 per night or £5.5 m daily.
  • Separate scheme offers up to £3,000 to asylum seekers willing to return to home countries.
The government is considering paying asylum seekers £100 a week to leave taxpayer-funded hotels and live with family or friends in the UK. Home Office officials have proposed the scheme as part of prime minister Keir Starmer's drive to accelerate the closure of asylum hotels. The weekly payment would come on top of the existing £49.18 support for living costs that migrants in hotels currently receive. The plan, set to be trialled in 2026, could reduce accommodation costs to a seventh of current spending. More than 32,000 migrants are currently housed in 200 hotels at an average cost of £145 per night or £1,015 a week. This compares with £23.25 a night for other dispersal accommodation in communities. The total bill for asylum hotels stands at £5.5 m a day, or £2.1 bn a year. Labour has pledged to stop their use by the end of this term in 2029, though suggestions indicate Starmer has privately set a one-year target.


The government has earmarked two former military barracks in Inverness, Scotland, and Crowborough, East Sussex, to house 900 migrants from the end of November as part of the hotel closure plan.


Keep ReadingShow less