Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Saudi money talks

by Amit Roy

THE utterly disgusting murder of the Saudi Arabian journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, inside his country’s consulate on October 2 has put the kingdom’s closest western allies, especially the UK, in an impossible situation.


After initially lying that he walked out of the consulate unharmed and then suggesting he died in a “fist fight”, Saudi foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir has admitted to Fox News that the journalist’s death was indeed murder.

The minister said Khashoggi’s death was a “huge and grave mistake”, and added that the 18 people implicated in the killing would be punished appropriately.

“This was an operation that was a rogue operation,” he added. “This was an operation where individuals ended up exceeding the authorities and responsibilities they had. They made the mistake when they killed Jamal Khashoggi in the consulate and they tried to cover up for it.”

He denied the killing had been ordered by the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman. “There were not people closely tied to him.”

However, former MI6 chief Sir John Sawers said “all the evidence” indicates Khashoggi, a US resident and Washington Post columnist who was critical of the current Saudi regime in general and Mohammed bin Salman in particular, was murdered on the orders of someone close to the crown prince.

It will be recalled Britain rolled out the red carpet for the crown prince in March, so what should be the country’s response now?

Oliver Sprague, Amnesty International UK’s arms expert, believes the UK should have halted arms sales to Saudi Arabia long ago over its military intervention in Yemen.

Liberal Democrats leader Sir Vince Cable commented: “The UK’s heavy reliance on Saudi Arabia for arms sales is embarrassingly compromising in these circumstances.

“The government should have already suspended arms export licences to Saudi Arabia given the outrages in Yemen. This reinforces the argument for loosening the bonds to the regime.”

But the UK reaction probably will be similar to that of the US, where president Donald Trump argued that halting arms deals would “hurt us more than it would hurt them”.

The UK has used standard arms licences to approve more than $6.4 billion (£4.9bn) in arms, including advanced jets and munitions, to Saudi Arabia since the start of the war in Yemen in 2015.

Labour would suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Barry Gardiner, shadow international trade secretary, has stated. “We must look very carefully again at the relationship we have with Saudi Arabia.”

He acknowledged there were a “lot of jobs” in the UK linked to the trade, but said “this is about who we are as a country”.

“We have a thriving defence industry and, of course, this would be a hit to that industry,” Gardiner, the Brent North MP, admitted.

Labour’s shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, tweeted: “The Saudi lies and impunity must stop here.”

It is unlikely, however, that a Labour government would act any differently to the ruling Conservatives.

In a joint statement, the UK foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, his French counterpart Jean-Yves Le Drian and Germany’s Heiko Maas said: “Nothing can justify this killing and we condemn it in the strongest possible terms. Defending freedom of expression and a free press are key priorities for Germany, the United Kingdom and France. The threatening, attacking or killing of journalists, under any circumstances, is unacceptable and of utmost

concern to our three nations.”

Now that he is no longer foreign secretary, Conservative MP Boris Johnson has used his newspaper column to condemn the Saudis and compared the killing of Khashoggi

with the attempted assassination, allegedly by the Russians, of Sergei and Yulia Skripal.

“In the Salisbury atrocity and the Khashoggi murder we therefore seem to have events of a type: statesponsored plots to execute opponents on foreign soil, where the very outlandishness of the modus operandi is intended to send a terrifying public warning to every expatriate journalist or dissident who dares to oppose the regime.

“This cannot become a pattern. We cannot just let it pass.

“Yes, of course our relations with Russia and with Saudi Arabia are very different. We have crucial commercial and security partnerships with Saudi Arabia…”

This is crucially the point. As the Brexit secretary Dominic Raab pointed out: “We are not throwing our hands in the air and terminating the relationship with Saudi Arabia, not just because of the huge number of British jobs that depend on it, but also because if you exert

influence over your partners you need to be able to talk to them.”

The problem is that in dealing with the Russians over the Skripals and the Saudis over Khashoggi, Britain cannot be seen to be adopting different moral standards.

Within Saudi Arabia, Khashoggi’s murder might trigger changes. The author Robert Lacey, a Saudi expert, has speculated that Mohammed bin Salman might have to be replaced

as crown prince. The irony is that he has many enemies because he was seen as a “reformer”.

More For You

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

DIVISIVE AGENDA:Police clash withprotesters outside Epping councilafter a march from the Bell Hotelhousing asylum seekers last Sunday(31)

Getty Images

Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

August is dubbed 'the silly season’ as the media must fill the airwaves with little going on. But there was a more sinister undertone to how that vacation news vacuum got filled this year. The recurring story of the political summer was the populist right’s confidence in setting the agenda and the anxiety of opponents about how to respond.

Tensions were simmering over asylum. Yet frequent predictions of mass unrest failed to materialise. The patchwork of local protests and counter-protests had a strikingly different geography to last summer. The sporadic efforts of disorder came in the affluent southern suburbs of Epping and Hillingdon, Canary Wharf and Cheshunt with no disorder and few large protests in the thirty towns that saw riots last August. Prosecutions, removing local ringleaders, deter. Local cohesion has been a higher priority where violence broke out than everywhere else. Hotel use for asylum has halved - and is more common in the south. The Home Office went to court to keep asylum seekers in Epping’s Bell Hotel, for now, yet stresses its goal to stop using hotels by 2029. The Refugee Council’s pragmatic suggestion of giving time-limited leave to remain to asylum seekers from the five most dangerous countries could halve the need for hotels within months.

Keep ReadingShow less