A court has heard that Urfan Sharif, the father of Sara Sharif, faced accusations of mistreating three former girlfriends prior to his daughter's death.
The 42-year-old is said to have been reported to the police by three unrelated women, all of whom claimed he confined them and exhibited controlling behaviour.
Sara was found dead in her Surrey home on 10 August 2023, having sustained numerous injuries. Her father, Urfan along with his wife, Beinash Batool, 30, and brother Faisal Malik, 29, is accused of causing Sara’s death.
Prosecutors claim Sara endured ongoing abuse leading up to her death. The trio have denied the murder charge, as well as a separate charge of causing or allowing the death of a child.
During the trial, new details emerged about Urfan's alleged abusive history involving three different women, including Sara's mother, Olga.
Sara Sharif’s father Urfan Sharif and his partner Beinash Batool (Image credit: Surrey Police)
Caroline Carberry KC, the defence barrister for Batool, presented evidence of previous allegations made against him. These included claims of violence, imprisonment, and intimidation reported by three unconnected women dating back to 2007.
Each woman accused Urfan of controlling behaviour, and all alleged that he had held them against their will and restricted their movements. He denied these claims, arguing they were false accusations.
According to court documents, in one incident, Urfan reportedly held a girlfriend in a locked room, confiscated her passport, and used physical threats. A later report indicated another woman experienced a similar ordeal, during which she alleged that he detained her and confiscated her travel documents. Each accusation, however, ended without charges.
Olga, who is also Sara’s biological mother, provided further allegations against Urfan during the trial. She accused him of assault, restricting her communication, and using violent punishment. Carberry stated that Olga’s accusations reflected a pattern of control and abuse. Urfan refuted these claims, maintaining that the charges were fabricated.
Meanwhile, it was also revealed that Sara shouted at her father to “go away” during a supervised contact session in 2015 when she was a toddler. At the time, she was not living with her father.
The jury heard that by 2019, Sara was living with her mother but later accused her of neglect and violence. Sara alleged that her mother smoked cannabis, neglected to feed her, left her alone with another child, and burned her with a lighter.
Urfan recorded these claims in a video, which ultimately contributed to a court decision awarding custody of Sara to him and his new wife, Batool.
The court also heard that Batool was a victim of "honour-based abuse" and described as vulnerable when she met Urfan.
Carberry KC argued that she was isolated and struggling, with a past marked by family rejection and time in a refuge after being deemed a "shame" by older family members.
The lawyer claimed that Urfan sought out vulnerable partners and was abusive, with Batool suffering his controlling behaviour and manipulation. A message from Batool to her sister showed her despair, calling her relationship with him “abusive.”
During the trial, Urfan dismissed accusations of abuse and claimed Batool was not vulnerable. The jury also reviewed past court orders requiring him to attend a domestic violence program, which he largely failed to complete. Despite this history, he later gained custody of Sara.
The court also reviewed details surrounding Sara’s final days. A video shown during the trial depicted Sara with a black eye shortly before her death. He, however, denied any knowledge of how she received the injury, claiming he could not recall it.
The defence has portrayed Urfan as someone with a history of gambling debts and excessive drinking, further suggesting these issues may have influenced his behaviour.
In response, he denied having an alcohol problem and insisted he never expressed anger towards his family members, particularly his children.
On Wednesday 4 June, some of the UK’s finest stand-up comedians will come together under one roof at The Comedy Store in London for a night of side-splitting entertainment – all in support of GamesAid, the video games industry charity dedicated to helping disadvantaged and disabled young people across the UK. Hosted by the brilliant Imran Yusuf, Stand Up for GamesAid blends humour, heart, and the gaming community's generosity in a single unmissable event.
Whether you’re a lifelong gamer, a comedy enthusiast, or simply someone looking to enjoy a lively evening in the capital, this charity comedy night promises top-tier entertainment with a powerful social impact. Held at The Comedy Store, one of London’s most iconic live venues located at 1a Oxendon Street, SW1Y 4EE, this event combines laughter and philanthropy in a feel-good atmosphere that welcomes all.
GamesAid is a UK-based charity that unites the video games industry to raise funds for smaller charities supporting children and young people. Through events like Stand Up for GamesAid, they’ve successfully channelled the passion of gamers and professionals in the gaming world into real-world action, providing vital support to causes that often go under the radar.
From mental health initiatives and disability services to educational and social inclusion programmes, GamesAid ensures that donations go directly to grassroots organisations that make a tangible difference. Supporting this event means helping to change lives – one laugh at a time.
While the full line-up is often kept under wraps until closer to the date, previous years have seen some of the UK’s top comedic talent grace the stage. With Imran Yusuf at the helm – known for his charismatic stage presence and quick wit – audiences can expect a high-energy, inclusive, and brilliantly funny show.
From mainstream TV comedians to rising stars on the circuit, Stand Up for GamesAid typically features a variety of voices and perspectives, ensuring a diverse night of comedy that caters to all tastes.
Located in the heart of the West End, The Comedy Store has been the beating heart of UK comedy for decades. Hosting everyone from Eddie Izzard to Jo Brand, it's the ideal location for an event that celebrates creativity, connection, and community. Its central location means it's easily accessible by tube, train or bus – perfect for locals and visitors alike.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
India's External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said trade or tariffs were not discussed in any conversations between Indian and US leaders during the clashes with Pakistan.
INDIA on Thursday said trade did not come up at all in discussions between Indian and American leaders during its military clashes with Pakistan, rejecting Washington’s claim that its offer of trade halted the confrontation.
US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told a New York court that India and Pakistan reached a “tenuous ceasefire” after president Donald Trump offered both nations trading access with the US to avoid a “full-scale war.”
In the past few weeks, Trump has repeatedly claimed he threatened India and Pakistan that the US would stop trade with them if they did not stop the conflict. India has consistently said that the understanding on cessation of hostilities was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two countries.
“From the time Operation Sindoor commenced on May 7 till the understanding on cessation of firing and military action was reached on May 10, there were conversations between Indian and the US leaders on the evolving military situation,” external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. “The issue of trade or tariff did not come up in any of those discussions,” he said at his weekly media briefing.
Jaiswal was answering questions on the Trump administration’s submission at the New York court. “The external affairs minister has also made it clear that the cessation of firing was decided upon in direct contacts between the DGMOs of India and Pakistan,” Jaiswal said.
Lutnick made the submission in the Court of International Trade last week, while opposing any attempt to restrain Trump from using emergency powers to impose tariffs. Lutnick said the president’s power to impose tariffs is crucial to his ability to conduct diplomacy.
“For example, India and Pakistan – two nuclear powers engaged in combat operations just 13 days ago – reached a tenuous ceasefire on May 10. This ceasefire was only achieved after president Trump interceded and offered both nations trading access with the United States to avert a full-scale war,” Lutnick said.
“An adverse ruling that constrains presidential power in this case could lead India and Pakistan to question the validity of president Trump’s offer, threatening the security of an entire region, and the lives of millions,” he said.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Timothée Chalamet and Kylie Jenner during the Knicks vs Pacers playoff game
The New York Knicks may have won Game 5 against the Indiana Pacers, but it was Timothée Chalamet and Kylie Jenner who truly stole the spotlight at Madison Square Garden on Thursday night. Sitting courtside among a sea of celebrities, the couple’s very public display of affection became the real talking point of the evening, with videos of their kiss flooding social media.
Cameras captured the duo leaning in close, whispering, kissing, and holding hands while seated next to actors Miles Teller and Ben Stiller. Chalamet, in a blue-and-orange Knicks jacket inspired by Patrick Ewing, looked completely at ease next to Jenner, who kept it sleek in a white top, leather trousers, and a Knicks cap. The two looked more like a couple on a romantic night out than high-profile guests at a tense playoff game.
— (@)
Online reactions were swift and fierce. Some joked that Chalamet was whispering spoilers for Dune: Part Two, while others compared the couple to overly affectionate teens in a school hallway. Criticism also surfaced, with users questioning Jenner’s absence from her children’s lives during such outings. Still, many were amused and intrigued by their chemistry.
Chalamet, a known Knicks fan and frequent attendee, has been spotted courtside multiple times throughout the playoff season. Jenner joined him earlier this month for a game against the Celtics, though their PDA was more subdued then.
Their latest appearance marked Jenner’s return to MSG, and this time, the couple didn’t hold back. After the Knicks clinched the win, the two were seen celebrating in the Garden’s back hallways, high-fiving fans and soaking in the playoff energy. Jenner raised her arms in triumph as she ran past the Knicks dancers, while Chalamet cheered with fans along the tunnel.
The pair, who went public with their relationship in late 2023 after being spotted at a Beyoncé concert, have slowly become regulars at major events, walking red carpets and appearing at festivals together and their appearance at the Knicks game was no different.
— (@)
And fans are now playfully noting a trend: the Knicks are undefeated whenever Jenner shows up. Coincidence? Perhaps. But it’s certainly working for now.
Keep ReadingShow less
A scene from Khaleja that inspired a fan’s unusual theatre stunt
The re-release of Khaleja in 4K was supposed to be a nostalgic celebration for Mahesh Babu fans, but in Vijayawada, things got out of hand when one fan turned a tribute into a real-life stunt.
In an attempt to mirror a well-known scene from the film, where Mahesh Babu’s character walks with a snake through the desert, a fan decided to bring an actual snake into the cinema. At first, the crowd thought it was just a prop. But when the snake began to move, panic broke out. The video of the incident quickly made its way online, with shocked viewers sharing it widely.
— (@)
While theatres across cities filled with fans celebrating the film’s return, complete with posters, dances, and fireworks, this incident sparked concern about how far fan enthusiasm should go. Theatre staff had to escort the person out before the situation worsened.
Released in 2010 and directed by Trivikram Srinivas, Khaleja had a slow start at the box office but eventually earned cult status. It co-starred Anushka Shetty and told the story of a taxi driver who finds himself caught up in a divine mission.
Mahesh Babu’s cult film Khaleja sees packed theatres during re-releaseTwitter/Amalapuram Mahesh FC
The re-release, now upgraded to 4K with Dolby Atmos sound, was one of the biggest for any Telugu film. Ticket sales before the premiere crossed £330,000 (₹3.5 crore) in India, with nearly 200,000 tickets sold on BookMyShow alone. Even in the US, advance collections reportedly hit £40,000 (₹43 lakh), prompting additional shows in multiple cities.
However, not everything went smoothly. Fans noticed that certain scenes and songs were missing from the new version, leading to outrage in some theatres. Videos showed audiences arguing with projectionists and halting screenings in protest. Missing sequences like the “Sunday Monday” song and popular dialogues led to frustration, with many venting their anger online.
— (@)
The response to Khaleja’s re-release shows the deep attachment fans have to the film, but also raises questions about where to draw the line between celebration and chaos. Whether it’s re-enacting a scene or demanding every frame be restored, the film clearly still strikes a chord 14 years after its release.
Keep ReadingShow less
General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started reducing troop numbers. (Photo: Reuters)
PAKISTAN and India are close to reducing troop levels along their border to those before the latest conflict began earlier this month, a senior Pakistani military official told Reuters on Friday. He cautioned, however, that the recent fighting had raised the risk of escalation in the future.
Both sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery in four days of clashes before a ceasefire was announced.
The fighting began after an attack in Indian Kashmir on April 22 that killed 26 people, most of them tourists. New Delhi blamed the attack on "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge denied by Islamabad.
On May 7, India launched missiles at what it said were "terrorist infrastructure" sites across the border. Pakistan responded with its own attacks, and both countries increased their troop presence along the frontier.
General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started reducing troop numbers.
"We have almost come back to the pre-22nd April situation... we are approaching that, or we must have approached that by now," said Mirza, the most senior Pakistani military official to speak publicly since the conflict.
India's ministry of defence and the office of the Indian chief of defence staff did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on Mirza's remarks.
Speaking in Singapore at the Shangri-La Dialogue forum, Mirza said there was no move towards nuclear weapons during this conflict, but it was a dangerous situation.
"Nothing happened this time," he said. "But you can't rule out any strategic miscalculation at any time, because when the crisis is on, the responses are different."
He said the risk of escalation in the future had grown, as the fighting this time was not limited to Kashmir. Both sides attacked military installations in their mainlands, but neither has acknowledged any serious damage.
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan this month that New Delhi would target "terrorist hideouts" again if there were new attacks on India.
'Dangerous trend'
India blames Pakistan for an insurgency in its part of Kashmir that began in 1989 and has killed tens of thousands. Pakistan says it provides only moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiris seeking self-determination.
"This (conflict) lowers the threshold between two countries who are contiguous nuclear powers... in the future, it will not be restricted to the disputed territory. It would come down to (the) whole of India and (the) whole of Pakistan," Mirza said. "This is a very dangerous trend."
Reuters has reported that the rapid escalation of hostilities ended in part because of behind-the-scenes diplomacy involving the US, India and Pakistan, and the key role played by Washington in brokering peace. India has denied any third-party role in the ceasefire and said that any engagement between India and Pakistan has to be bilateral.
Mirza said international mediation might be more difficult in the future because of a lack of crisis management mechanisms between the two countries.
"The time window for the international community to intervene would now be very less, and I would say that damage and destruction may take place even before that time window is exploited by the international community," he said.
He said Pakistan was open to dialogue, but apart from a crisis hotline between the directors general of military operations and some hotlines at the tactical level on the border, there was no other communication between the two countries.
New Delhi has maintained a hard line on any possible talks.
“If there are talks, it will only be on terrorism and (Pakistan Kashmir)," Indian defence minister Rajnath Singh said on Friday. "If Pakistan is serious about talks, it should hand over terrorists... to India so that justice is served.”
Mirza said there were no backchannel discussions or informal talks to ease tensions. He also said he had no plans to meet General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defence staff, who is also in Singapore for the forum.
"These issues can only be resolved by dialogue and consultations, on the table. They cannot be resolved on the battlefield," Mirza said.
Justin Bieber faces backlash for ‘I love you’ comment on 17-year-old star Ariana Greenblatt’s post