Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Sailesh Mehta:‘Light touch regulation’ failings reflected in inquiry report

by SAILESH MEHTA

Mosaic Initiative


IN THE early hours of June 14, 2017, at Grenfell Tower in north Kensington, London, a kitchen fire in a flat on the fourth floor broke out as a result of a fault in a fridge-freezer.

It was an unremarkable fire, the sort that the fire brigade deal with on a regular basis, rarely resulting in anything more than a little local damage. And it should have remained that way.

Unfortunately, it expanded out of the kitchen window and then spread rapidly in the 23-floor building, as a result of cladding on the outside walls of the tower block. The cladding was put there during refurbishment works, but it should never have been there.

The building had a “stay put” policy, which means that the fire brigade expects and advises residents to stay inside their flats until the fire is put out. The policy works as long as the fire remains contained and does not spread. Within two hours, all of the upper floors

were alight, and 72 people died as a result of the blaze.

Phase 1 of the Grenfell fire inquiry results was published last week. It reached damning conclusions in relation to a number of topics, mainly relating to the cause of the fire and the response by the emergency services.

Cladding on the high-rise block breached building regulations and caused the fire to spread rapidly. The “stay put” policy requiring residents to remain indoors rather than use the single stairway escape route should not have been adhered to once it became clear that the

fire was spreading quickly and it was clearly unsafe to remain inside.

The author of the report, Sir Peter Moore-Bick, concluded that senior fire officers should have abandoned the policy when it became clear that the fire was spreading very fast. Had this been done, many more lives could have been saved. Instead, residents remained in

their flats until the stairway became unusable and they could not escape the fire.

The lack of training of senior fire officers to deal with such large fires involving cladding is also a focal point of criticism. The fire brigade is seriously criticised for “systemic failures” in the report.

The report’s conclusions are valid and were expected, given the nature of the evidence received by the Grenfell inquiry. Unfortunately, it has not and will never deal with the more important underlying causes of the fire and the cause of so many unnecessary deaths.

Successive governments have reduced the role of regulatory bodies such as the fire brigade to deal with fire safety. Since the 1980s, the burden has slowly been shifted from the regulator to those it regulates.

The new regime, referred as “light touch regulation” requires self-regulation. Unfortunately, that often results in cost cutting, at the expense of safety for those who need protection.

‘Light touch regulation’ has been the watchword in areas ranging from banking and food hygiene, to health and safety. It is often a thinly disguised way for local and national government to cut costs. Such policies have had disastrous consequences elsewhere, usually lead-ing to a lowering of standards and allowing unscrupulous companies to prosper

at the expense of those who they should be protecting.

The second part of the inquiry will not deal with the likely causal connection between cuts to the emergency services and the lack of adequate training, the lack of sufficient equipment to fight large fires and the “institutional failings” of the fire brigade. The budget for prosecutions for breaches of fire safety has been slashed over the years – and again

this will not feature in any report.

While the inquiry will have been told about the lack of equipment for fighting high-rise fires – some had to be brought in from other fire brigades during the blaze at Grenfell – it cannot look into the cost-cutting exercise that leaves London with some of the tallest high-rise buildings in the world but without adequate equipment to protect them.

The inquiry will also not look at the financial reasons for building regulation officers’ lack of sufficient scrutiny of the refurbishment works that were the main cause of a fairly ordinary fire becoming an uncontrollable blaze. Every local authority in the country has faced similar

– or worse – belt-tightening exercises.

It cannot be of comfort to the families of the deceased to know that the report will not deal with such fundamentally important potential causes of the disaster. In fact, family representatives were asking for a broadening of the terms of reference, but such calls were not heeded.

Instead, the report heaps blame on easy targets such as the fire brigade service, whose officers were placed in extreme danger in a situation which should never have occurred.

Observers of the British constitution have often remarked that public inquiries such as Grenfell are designed by the government of the day to meet their own ends. They serve a purpose beyond any investigation into the true causes of an incident. Often the purpose is to create a commotion while a minister tiptoes away before the real causes of the disas-

ter are discovered.

It was ever thus with inquiries. They are designed to allow ministers to tiptoe quietly away.

Sailesh Mehta is a barrister specialising in human rights and regulatory law

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less