Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

‘Rage bait’ is Oxford University Press’s word of the year for 2025

The term that’s been stirring anger in your social feeds has officially made it into the dictionary.

Rage bait

Rage bait isn’t just clickbait — it’s Oxford University Press’ word of the year for 2025

iStock/Gemini AI

Highlights:

  • Rage bait captures online content designed to provoke anger
  • Oxford University Press saw a threefold rise in its use over 2025
  • Beat contenders aura farming and biohack for the top spot
  • Highlights how social media manipulates attention and emotion

Rage bait is officially 2025’s word of the year, Oxford University Press confirmed on Monday, shining a light on the internet culture that has dominated the past 12 months. The term, which describes online content deliberately meant to stir anger or outrage, has surged in use alongside endless scrolling and viral social media posts, the stuff that makes you click, comment, maybe even argue.

Rage bait Rage bait isn’t just clickbait — it’s Oxford University Press’ word of the year for 2025 iStock/Gemini AI



What is rage bait and why it matters

Oxford defines rage bait as content “designed to elicit anger or outrage by being frustrating, provocative or offensive.” It’s the cousin of clickbait, but with a sharper edge: it doesn’t just tempt curiosity, it targets emotion. The goal is simple: more traffic, more shares, more engagement.

Casper Grathwohl, president of Oxford Languages, said the term’s rise shows awareness of “manipulation tactics” online. He added that where last year’s word, brain rot, captured the mental drain of scrolling, rage bait highlights the content engineered to spark outrage.

Rage bait


Why rage bait changed things for Oxford University Press

Rage bait topped two other contenders, aura farming, the art of cultivating a confident public persona, and biohack, attempts to optimise health or performance. The selection points to 2025’s mood: a digital environment where anger fuels engagement. The Oxford team analysed usage trends, online patterns, and cultural impact before crowning it the winner.

Rage bait Online Trends iStock


How fans and the public reacted

Even without knowing the term, most social media users have encountered rage bait. Lexicographer Susie Dent told the BBC that creators often “bask in millions of comments and shares,” and that social media algorithms amplify outrage naturally. In other words: people engage more when provoked, not when shown fluffy kittens.

Rage bait Rage bait isn\u2019t just clickbait \u2014 it\u2019s Oxford University Press\u2019 word of the year for 2025 iStock/Gemini AI


What’s next for the word of the year

Rage bait isn’t exactly new though. Oxford notes it first appeared online in 2002 in a Usenet post, then evolved into internet slang used to critique networks of content. Its spike in 2025 clearly shows both growing usage and the public’s recognition of emotional manipulation online. Past winners include emoji, goblin mode and selfie. Casper Grathwohl says it joins last year’s brain rot in a cycle: outrage gets clicks, algorithms push it, and users end up mentally drained, often finding it hard to scroll past.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Jared Leto: What the BBC investigation means for Thirty Seconds to Mars' UK tour

BBC investigation features allegations from 10 women against Leto

Getty Images

Jared Leto: What the BBC investigation means for Thirty Seconds to Mars' UK tour

Highlights

  • BBC investigation features allegations from 10 women against Jared Leto
  • Thirty Seconds to Mars is due to perform in London and Manchester next spring
  • Eastern Eye sought comment from the tour promoter and venues but received no response

Fresh allegations against Jared Leto have placed renewed attention on Thirty Seconds to Mars' upcoming UK tour, with the band's scheduled performances in London and Manchester now under scrutiny following a BBC investigation.

The investigation includes accounts from 10 women, four of whom accuse the Oscar-winning actor and musician of criminal sexual conduct. The allegations relate to incidents alleged to have taken place between 2002 and 2016, when the women say they were teenagers or young adults.

Keep ReadingShow less