Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Prime minister’s questions

By Amit Roy

DR TONY SEWELL, chair­man of the commissioners , says in his foreword to the race report: “Last summer, the prime minister asked if I would be willing to chair a commission to investigate race and ethnic disparities in the UK…I readily agreed: I have spent all my working life as an educationalist, dedicated to this cause.


“The Commission was es­tablished with 10 of us drawn from a variety of fields span­ning science, education, economics, broadcasting, medicine, and policing.

“All the while we have been supported by the Cabinet Office’s Race and Disparity Unit ... set up in 2016. It has accumulated all the impor­tant data on race and ethnic­ity, in one database.”

Boris Johnson set up the commission after the Black Lives Matter protests spilled over from the US to the UK last summer. The word is the commission’s composition was influenced by Munira Mirza, head of the policy unit at 10, Downing Street. It is said neither she nor Sewell believes Britain is in­stitutionally racist.

So what does Boris think of the report?

I am assuming he has skimmed through the 264-page report, with its 24 recommendations.

He called it a “very interesting piece of work” but added: “I don’t say the government is going to agree with abso­lutely everything in it.”

We don’t know the bits he disagrees with, but he said that “it has some original and stimulating work in it that I think people need to read and to consider.

“There are very serious is­sues that our society faces to do with racism that we need to address. We’ve got to do more to fix it, we need to un­derstand the severity of the problem. We’re going to be looking at all the ideas they have put forward, and we’ll be making our response.”

More For You

tech grok

Musk – the world’s richest man – wants to be the greatest global influencer too: a Citizen Kane for our age. (Photo credit: Getty Images)

Why Britain must make social media lawful again

THIS must be a “tipping point” for the rule of law online, technology secretary Liz Kendall told the House of Commons earlier this week. X owner Elon Musk’s Grok AI tool helped that site’s users make sexist harassment the viral new year trend of 2026. Politicians across the world declared it was “appalling” and “unacceptable”. The challenge is to turn that declaratory rhetoric into action. Britain’s media regulator Ofcom will open a formal investigation.

The controversy has illuminated again how US billionaire businessman Musk takes a “pick and mix” approach as to which laws he thinks should apply to him and his companies. Even libertarian site owners tend to recognise some responsibility to remove child sexual abuse. But Musk was laughing about the nudification trend. He is contemptuous about laws curbing hate crime and the incitement of violence, saying they are signs Britain has a “fascist” government which must be overthrown. What is vital is that our government and regulators do not risk emulating Musk’s “pick and mix” approach to when unlawful content really matters. Ofcom states it will not “hesitate to investigate” when it suspects companies are failing in their duties “especially where there’s a risk of harm to children”. This will be a popular public priority. Ofcom must this year show parliamentarians and the public that it can find the bandwidth and capacity to insist on sites meeting all of their legal duties.

Keep ReadingShow less