Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Patel 'rejects Met chief’s positive discrimination plan to hire more BAME recruits'

HOME SECRETARY Priti Patel has firmly rejected Metropolitan Police chief Dame Cressida Dick's call for "positive discrimination" to be introduced during the recruitment process to hire more people from ethnic minorities.

The Met chief proposed applying a form of positive discrimination to increase BAME recruits saying police forces must reflect the society they serve to achieve the confidence of diverse communities. As per her proposal, she wants more legal scope to allow the Met Police to choose black and ethnic minority applicants over their white peers.


However, the home secretary office has apparently rejected the idea.

“It’s fair to say positive discrimination is illegal for a reason,” a Home Office source told The Daily Mail on Tuesday (1), stressing that “lawful positive action” could be taken, but there is “no need for positive discrimination to increase the diversity of the police.”

More than 40 per cent of London residents are black, Asian or minority ethnic as compared to just 18 per cent in the Met’s workforce. The Met wants to increase its intake to 40 per cent of all officers by next April to increase its diversity, for which its chief has been lobbying the proposal, backed by Met assistant commissioner Neil Basu.

 

Some Tory MPs have branded the proposal “discrimination against white people” and called for Dame Cressida to focus on recruiting “the best person for the job.”

 

Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen said he is “more interested in officers who can enforce the law rather than meeting a quota” and accused the Met chief of “heading off into dangerous territory” while she should rather “ensure there is no racism in the force.”

They have also warned that the Met Police's plan to bulk its number of black and ethnic minority officers could be seen as “lowering the bar.”

Tory MP Bob Blackman branded the positive discrimination idea as “demeaning” and “an insult to people of different minority communities,” adding that Met needed to encourage people from different communities and cautioned that should it be made a law it will “breed resentment’ among colleagues."

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

andy-burnham-starmer

Andy Burnham says Labour's commitment to the triple lock will remain in place despite calls for a policy rethink

BBC Question Time/Handout via REUTERS

Andy Burnham rules out scrapping triple lock despite growing pressure over £15.5 billion cost

  • Andy Burnham says Labour will keep the triple lock on state pensions until the next general election.
  • Some economic advisers have reportedly urged him to rethink the policy, warning it could cost £15.5 billion by 2030.
  • Burnham also backed electoral reform, defended his growth strategy and hinted at a broader definition of public control for essential services.

Andy Burnham's triple lock pledge will remain in place until the next general election, with the Labour leader-in-waiting ruling out any immediate plans to scrap one of the party's key commitments to pensioners despite growing pressure from some economists and advisers.

Responding to questions during an Ask Me Anything session on Reddit, Burnham said Labour would honour its manifesto promise to retain the state pension triple lock, which guarantees annual increases based on whichever is highest: inflation, average earnings or 2.5 per cent.

Keep ReadingShow less