PAKISTAN'S opposition parties have submitted a no-confidence motion against prime minister Imran Khan, holding his government responsible for the spiralling inflation.
The motion, signed by about 100 lawmakers from the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), was submitted to the National Assembly Secretariat on Tuesday (8).
"We have taken this decision for the people of Pakistan and not for ourselves," PML-N president and leader of the opposition Shehbaz Sharif said.
Signatures of at least 68 members of parliament are required to force the Speaker to summon a session, which should be convened between three and seven days to conduct a vote on a no-confidence motion.
In the House of 342, the opposition needs the support of 172 members to remove the prime minister and his cabinet.
Khan, 69, who is heading a coalition government, can be removed if some of the partners decide to switch sides, which is not unusual in parliamentary democracies.
Reacting to the opposition move, Khan said the country's powerful army was with him and he was confident that the government was “not going anywhere”.
"The army stands with me, it will never support thieves ... and since the people are not backing the opposition any more, they are claiming that the establishment is supporting them," he said.
The army, which has ruled Pakistan for more than half of its 73 plus years of existence, has hitherto wielded considerable power in the matters of security and foreign policy.
"After this, nothing will happen against this government till 2028... The opposition will face a humiliating defeat," the prime minister said.
"My lawmakers are being offered Rs 180 million (equivalent to £762,750 for supporting no-confidence motion). I told them to take the money and distribute it among the poor," he claimed.
Echoing the ruling party's narrative of international conspiracy behind attempts seeking his removal, Khan said people who do not want an independent foreign policy would support the no-confidence motion.
Khan had said he was ready for everything the opposition throws at him.
Opposition parties blame Khan's government for “uncontrolled inflation” that has broken the back of poor people of the country, while Khan accuses them of trying to remove him as he was not willing to condone the alleged corruption by the leading opposition leaders.
The opposition is confident of having the required numbers to remove Khan, Geo TV reported, citing sources.
The opposition has claimed that they have the backing of 28 lawmakers of the ruling party and others from an ally of the government, sources said.
Meanwhile, Khan's close aide Aleem Khan announced that he would be joining hands with disgruntled party leader Jahangir Tareen, prompting the prime minister to dispatch Sindh governor Imran Ismail to Lahore to pacify the former Punjab minister.
Khan has also summoned the attorney general of Pakistan at the Prime Minister's House to discuss legal aspects after the Opposition tabled the no-trust move against him.
Khan, a former cricketer, came to power in 2018 and elections are to be held in 2023 if he succeeds to ward off the challenge of the no-trust move.
He had promised to clean the country of corruption and create a “new Pakistan”.
Last year in March, the prime minister had voluntarily sought a trust vote following an upset in Senate elections. In a show of strength, he had secured 178 votes – six more than required – to win the vote of confidence from the National Assembly, the Dawn reported.
THE north east economy is at risk of losing tens of millions of pounds if a new tax on international student fees is imposed, university and business leaders have warned.
Labour ministers have proposed charging a six per cent levy on tuition fees paid by overseas students in England, which education secretary Bridget Phillipson announced will be used to pay for the return of means-tested maintenance grants for some learners from lower-income households.
But the organisation representing some of England’s top universities, including Newcastle and Durham, claims the move is the “wrong way” to reintroduce the grants abolished under the Conservatives in 2016 and risks doing “more harm than good”.
There are concerns that universities would pass the impact of the levy onto international students through tuition fee hikes, rather than absorbing the costs at a time when the higher education sector has been experiencing major budget cuts, resulting in a fall in the number of people coming from overseas to study in the UK.
international students make up almost a third of the student population in the north east
The Russell Group said international students currently make up almost a third of the student population at its universities in the north east – and account for over a quarter of their collective income.
A study from the Higher Education Policy Institute found the levy would cost Durham University £10 million and Newcastle University £9m, putting them in the top twenty worst affected institutions in the country.
Research by Public First has also warned the north east stands to lose £87m in the first year of a levy due to projected falls in international student numbers, which it estimates at 77,000 nationally over five years.
It names Newcastle Central and West as the constituency potentially suffering the eighth biggest hit in the country, just under £30m in Gross Value Added (GVA), with the City of Durham predicted to lose £14.5m and Sunderland Central £12.5m.
Henri Murison, chief executive of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, said bringing back maintenance grants would help more young people in the north access higher education – but that funding them through this levy “risks undermining the financial sustainability of universities”.
Murison added: “This will mean losing a significant amount of the subsidy for domestic students that their international counterparts currently provide. If there are over 135,000 fewer places across our leading world-class institutions, that means fewer opportunities – especially for the most disadvantaged.
“We know that in cities like Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Newcastle there are constituencies with over £30 million in GVA to lose along with similar places in London, West Midlands and Scotland.”
Newcastle University said last year it was facing a £35m financial black hole due to a decline in international students and has since slashed £20m from its wage bill, with cuts having sparked prolonged strike action from academics.
Durham University also announced in January it had to cut costs by £20m over two years.
Dr Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, said: “Universities like Newcastle and Durham, and many others across the north east contribute a huge amount to their local areas – from providing skills and training to the local workforce, to ground-breaking research and infrastructure projects.
“If the proposed levy goes ahead, it will add greater pressure on an already financially precarious sector to the detriment of the very students and communities that government is looking to support.
“Reinstating maintenance grants has been a long-standing campaign for us, because we know financial pressures are a huge challenge for students – especially those from under-privileged backgrounds. In fact, universities already spend millions of pounds each year on widening access, including bursaries and hardship funds. This spending would also be at risk if the levy goes ahead.”
The Department for Education was contacted for a response.
It said last month the levy would “maintain a competitive offer for international students while ensuring the benefits are shared more visibly at home, directly benefiting disadvantaged domestic students”.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.