PAKISTAN'S parliament session was on Thursday (31) adjourned abruptly till Sunday (3) after opposition lawmakers demanded an immediate vote on a no-confidence motion against prime minister Imran Khan.
The adjournment came amid vociferous protest from the opposition who had tabled the motion on March 28.
Khan has suffered further setbacks as two main allies of the government - Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and Balochistan Awami Party (BAP) - have joined the ranks against him.
The government lost its majority after the allies ditched it and pressure is mounting on the cricketer-turned-politician.
His ministers, however, said Khan would fight until “the last ball of the last over”.
Khan needs 172 votes in the Lower House of 342 to foil the opposition's bid to topple him.
However, Maulana Fazlur Rehman, chief of Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam Fazl (JUI-F), said the opposition has the support of 175 lawmakers and the prime minister should resign.
No Pakistani prime minister has ever completed a full five-year term in office. Also, no prime minister in Pakistan's history has ever been ousted through a no-confidence motion.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Insurer tried to claim that gold and silver stolen from their home was not covered by their policy (Photo for representation: iStock)
Insurer ordered to pay couple after gold theft dispute
Jan 07, 2026
A BRITISH couple have won an insurance dispute after their provider refused to pay compensation for stolen gold and silver, arguing that the items counted as fine art rather than personal belongings.
According to The Times, the couple, identified only as Mr and Mrs L, were victims of a burglary in which a gold bar and a block of silver were taken from their home, along with other possessions.
When they made a claim, their insurer, Fairmead Insurance, paid for some losses but rejected the claim for the precious metals. The company said the items fell under the policy’s category of fine art and collectables and were therefore not covered.
Mr and Mrs L challenged this view and took the case to the Financial Ombudsman Service, arguing that the gold and silver should be treated as personal possessions under their home insurance policy.
The ombudsman ruled in their favour. In his decision, ombudsman Mike Waldron said that although Fairmead’s policy definition of art and antiques mentioned gold and silver, this only applied if the items were antiques or had artistic value.
“I haven’t seen any evidence that shows the gold bar and silver block are antiques or have artistic merit,” Waldron said, adding that they could not reasonably be classed as fine art.
He ordered Fairmead to settle the original claim, pay 8 per cent interest, and provide an extra £100 to compensate the couple for the inconvenience caused.
“We take customer service extremely seriously and feedback from policyholders indicates they are happy with the service. However, we acknowledge there is always room for improvement and that is why we are continually looking at ways to make our service even better," a spokesperson for Fairmead Insurance was quoted as saying.Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
Current Issue
×
Terms and Conditions
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
© Copyright 2026 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Asian Media Group USA Inc










