Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘No clear evidence of Islamophobia’ in Nusrat Ghani's 2020 sacking

‘No clear evidence of Islamophobia’ in Nusrat Ghani's 2020 sacking

An ethics adviser to prime minister Rishi Sunak has said he found no clear evidence of Islamophobia to back up allegations by MP Nusrat Ghani that she was sacked from her ministerial job in 2020 partly because of her Muslim faith.

Ghani, 50, who has now been reinstated in the government, said last year that she had been told by a whip - an enforcer of parliamentary discipline - that her Muslim faith was making her colleagues uncomfortable and was a factor in her sacking as junior transport minister in February 2020.

Then prime minister Boris Johnson ordered an inquiry into the allegations in January 2022.

Announcing the inquiry's findings, Laurie Magnus, Sunak's independent adviser on ministers' interests, said Ghani's concerns were "very serious", but that he was unable to determine what exactly transpired in meetings between her and the government's then chief whip Mark Spencer.

He said he had received conflicting evidence from each of them and that there was no evidence to suggest that negative comments about Ghani's faith were made, but also that it was not possible to conclude they were not.

"In the absence of clear evidence, it would not be right to take further action," Sunak wrote in a reply to Magnus.

The Conservative Party has previously faced accusations of Islamophobia, and a report in 2021 criticised it over how it dealt with complaints of discrimination against Muslims.

Ghani said Magnus's report showed her evidence had been consistent, and there was no criticism expressed about her version of the events.

"We all serve at the Prime Minister's choosing and there is no shame in a political career ending," Ghani said in response to the report. "But to be told your faith and identity is the reason for it cannot be acceptable in any way."

Spencer did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both he and Ghani are currently ministers in Sunak's government.

(Reuters)

More For You

asylum seekers

Members of the public in the council meeting hold up signs during Cllr Amos's questions

Via LDRS

Worcester asylum seekers fleeing death penalty and religious persecution, charity reveals

Phil Wilkinson Jones

Highlights

  • Young men at Worcester hotel fled countries like Iran and Nigeria where homosexuality carries death penalty.
  • Summer protests outside Fownes Hotel left asylum seekers feeling "very vulnerable".
  • Charity challenges "harmful rhetoric" of labelling asylum seekers as "illegal immigrants".
Asylum seekers staying at a Worcester hotel are fleeing religious persecution and the death penalty for being gay in their home countries, a local charity has revealed.
Simon Cottingham, co-founder of Worcester City Welcomes Refugees, made the disclosure at Worcester City Council's full meeting on Tuesday.

Speaking about residents at the city's asylum seeker accommodation, Mr Cottingham said "A lot of young men who are in that hotel actually are fleeing because they are gay."

He explained that in countries like Iran and Nigeria, individuals face the death penalty for homosexuality, while others are persecuted for converting to Christianity or their political beliefs.

Keep ReadingShow less