Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Musk vs OpenAI: Nine-person jury to rule whether Altman broke non-profit commitments

Trial enters final stage after closing arguments in Silicon Valley courtroom battle

Musk vs OpenAI lawsuit

The trial, which began last month at a federal courthouse in Oakland, California, has gripped Silicon Valley

Getty Images

Highlights

  • Closing arguments finish in lawsuit over OpenAI's change to for-profit company.
  • Musk wants $134bn moved back and seeks removal of Altman and Brockman.
  • Trial revealed private conversations between tech leaders and OpenAI's troubled past.
Closing arguments finished on Thursday in Elon Musk's lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI, bringing the weeks-long court case closer to a decision.
A nine-person jury will now decide whether the AI company and its chief executive broke promises made when the organisation started.

The trial, which began last month at a federal courthouse in Oakland, California, has gripped Silicon Valley.

It included testimony from major tech industry names and showed previously private messages between Musk and Altman.


Musk claims Altman, OpenAI and its president Greg Brockman broke a founding agreement when they changed the non-profit into a for-profit company.

He says they took his money unfairly and made themselves rich improperly. OpenAI has denied all claims, saying Musk acts out of jealousy after trying and failing to take control of the company in 2018.

The firm says Musk always knew about plans to create a for-profit business.

Musk's lawyer Steven Molo built his closing argument around whether Altman can be trusted, listing witnesses who said Altman was dishonest or misleading.

"Sam Altman's credibility is directly at issue in this case," Molo told the jury. "If you cannot trust him, if you do not believe him, they cannot win. It's that simple."

Defence counters claims

OpenAI's lawyer Sarah Eddy told jurors that Musk's case lacks solid evidence proving he set specific conditions for his money.

She pointed out that even Musk's romantic partner Shivon Zilis could not remember an explicit agreement about his funding terms.

"Even the people who work for him. Even the mother of his children can't back his story," Eddy said, adding that no documents support Musk's version of events.

OpenAI showed evidence claiming Musk knew by 2017 that the company was thinking about a for-profit structure and had tried to control the firm himself.

The defence also argued Musk's claims fall outside the legal time limit for bringing such cases.

The trial included dramatic moments, with Musk accusing Altman of "stealing a charity" while Altman responded that Musk "did try to kill it". Musk was not present during closing arguments, having travelled to China with Donald Trump.

Musk wants Altman and Brockman removed from the company and seeks $134 billion to be moved from OpenAI's for-profit side back to its non-profit organisation.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

'Resident Evil: Code Veronica' returns as Capcom revives a fan favourite chapter

More than two decades after its original release

X/ summergamefest

'Resident Evil: Code Veronica' returns as Capcom revives a fan favourite chapter

Highlights

  • Capcom has announced a remake of Resident Evil – Code: Veronica
  • The survival horror title is scheduled for release in 2027
  • The game follows Claire and Chris Redfield during a viral outbreak spanning a prison island and Antarctica
  • The remake was unveiled during Summer Game Fest in Los Angeles

More than two decades after its original release, one of the most popular entries in the Resident Evil series is set to return.

Capcom has confirmed that Resident Evil: Code Veronica, a remake of the 2000 game Resident Evil – Code: Veronica, will launch in 2027. The announcement was made during Summer Game Fest, one of the gaming industry's biggest annual showcases.

Keep ReadingShow less