AN A TO Z GUIDE TO THE MOVIE-MAKING GIANT, FROM LAUNCHING STARS AND OSCARS TO HIS IMMORTAL CLASSIC MOTHER INDIA
by ASJAD NAZIR
This month marks the death anniversary of legendary Indian filmmaker Mehboob Khan, whose many impressive achievements included getting India’s first Oscar nomination for his 1957 masterpiece Mother India.
Perhaps the most influential commercial filmmaker during the golden age of Indian cinema, he also delivered classic films, built a giant studio and gave a platform to many newcomers, who would become superstars.
So to pay tribute to the legend, who passed away on May 24, 1964, aged just 56, Eastern Eye compiled an all-you-need-to-know A to Z about arguably the most important moviemaker in Bollywood history.
A is for Andaz: This visionary filmmaker delivered one of the most important movies in the history of Indian cinema in 1949. It remains the greatest love triangle ever made and became the highest grossing Bollywood film when it was released. But its biggest achievement was turning the three relative newcomers in the lead roles, Raj Kapoor, Dilip Kumar and Nargis, into superstars. Andaz was also stylistically influential and gave a platform to the then-unknown Lata Mangeshkar.
B is for BR Chopra: Before he became a famous filmmaker, legendary producer-director BR Chopra worked as a journalist and was able to spend time with Mehboob, learning from him. Then after Chopra started making films, Mehboob turned down Naya Daur (1957). Chopra snapped up the screenplay and scored the first big blockbuster of his career. Mehboob turned up to the premiere of Naya Daur and magnanimously admitted he was wrong to reject such a great film in front of the entire fraternity.
C is for Colour: Mehboob’s 1952 blockbuster Aan was India’s first technicolour release and the highest budget movie made at that time. It smashed box office records and was the first Bollywood release to be subtitled in 17 languages, and was released in 28 countries, including the UK, the USA and Japan. If inflation is taken into account, it is one of India’s highest grossing movies in history.
D is for Dancer: Sitara Devi was one of the greatest kathak artists of the 20th century and reluctant to act in films because it would damage her standing as a classical dancer. But she was persuaded to step in front of the camera playing lead roles in Mehboob’s films Judgement Of Allah (1935) and Watan (1938). Her last onscreen appearance was during a holi dance in Mother India (1957) and after that she concentrated on kathak, to become perhaps the greatest female exponent of it.
E is for Ek Hi Raasta: The 1939 social drama Ek Hi Raasta directed by Mehboob was one of the first Hindi films to make a noticeable application of the Second World War. The movie marked the debut of actor Arun Kumar Ahuja, who had a notable career and is the father of Bollywood star Govinda.
F is for Film Federation of India: The big thinking filmmaker was widely regarded as the most senior figure during the golden era of Bollywood and was the president of the important Film Federation of India.
G is for Girl Power: Mehboob was perhaps the first commercial filmmaker who wrote prominent characters for females, starting with the 1940-classic Aurat, which he remade as the Oscar-nominated Mother India (see O). For Najma (1943), the title is named after the lead female character; Noor Jehan got her most memorable role in Anmol Ghadi (1946); Nargis plays the woman at the centre of a love triangle in Andaz (1949) and Nadira made her debut in Aan (1952), playing an explosive role. In Amar (1954), the male is the villain and all sympathies are with the female character.
H is for Honours: There were no award ceremonies when the director was doing some of his finest work, so he got relatively few accolades. The bulk of the honours came for Mother India, which includes Filmfare and National Awards, along with his country’s first Oscar nomination.
I is for Imperial Film Company: Mehboob was a young hopeful in the 1920s when he started working for legendary filmmaker Ardeshir Irani’s Imperial Film Company as an assistant and extra. He learned all the nuances of filmmaking and set himself up for an extraordinary career, which would kick off in the following decade with production house Sagar Movietone (see S).
J is for Judgement Of Allah: The filmmaker finally made his directorial debut in 1935 with the film Judgement Of Allah, which also had the title Al Hilal. The ambitious costume-drama, based on Cecil B DeMille’s The Sign Of The Cross (1932), was a resounding success.
K is for Knowledge: From the mid-1940s until his death, Mehboob was seen as the senior and most knowledgeable figure in Indian cinema. Many filmmakers found interesting subjects, thanks to him. These included legendary producer-director Sohrab Modi, who was told about the story of his blockbuster Prithvi Vallabh (1943) by Mehboob.
L is for Launch pad: There have been many Bollywood legends who got their launch pad to greatness, thanks to the visionary filmmaker. Some newcomers who became overnight stars, thanks to Mehboob, include Nargis, Noor Jehan, Suraiya, Raj Kapoor, Dilip Kumar, Nadira, Sunil Dutt and Raaj Kumar.
M is for Mehboob studio: After starting his directorial journey in 1935, the filmmaker became independent with Mehboob Productions in 1942. After making a number of successful films he had the finance to build his own studio in Bandra, Mumbai in the early 1950s. He made successful films there, but, more important, leased it out to other producers like Guru Dutt, who shot the iconic Kaagaz Ke Phool (1959) there. The studio survived debt, real estate development and a fire. For decades, it has been home to diverse productions featuring the biggest stars from different generations, including today.
N is for Naushad: Music director Naushad was already successful, but rose to the very top after delivering songs for Mehboob’s blockbuster Anmol Ghadi. After that success, Mehboob used only Naushad to compose the songs for all the films that followed, which included Elaan (1947), Andaz, Aan and Mother India.
O is for Oscars: Only two Bollywood commercial films have been nominated for an Oscar in the Best Foreign Language Film category and the first of these was Mehboob’s classic Mother India, which lost out on the award by one vote to Italian movie Nights of Cabiria (1957). One of the greatest movies ever made was a career-defining role for legendary actress Nargis and remains the greatest female role in Hindi cinema history. It was a remake of Mehboob’s earlier film Aurat (1940) and won numerous accolades.
P is for Psychological: It may not have been his most successful film, but Amar was a path-breaking release and way ahead of its time. The psychological drama, starring Dilip Kumar, Nimmi and Madhubala, explores a violent act among the main characters and the crisis of conscience that ensues. The story exploring the aftermath of a heinous act shocked audiences when it was released.
Q is for Queen: There were many stars who got their first big break as leads in a major movie, thanks to the visionary filmmaker. The standout leading debutante was Nargis, who was 14 years old when she was cast opposite Motilal in Taqdeer (1943). He would later help turn Nargis into the greatest leading lady of the golden era with iconic releases like Andaz and the Oscar-nominated Mother India.
R is for Replacement: A-list superstar Dilip Kumar was supposed to play the rebellious son Birju in Mother India, but Mehboob replaced him with newcomer Sunil Dutt, when Dilip also insisted on playing the role of the father, which eventually went to then-aspiring actor Raaj Kumar.
S is for Sagar Movietone: The production house that first truly believed in Mehboob was Sagar Movietone. He worked there as an actor before getting his break as a director with the successful movie Judgement Of Allah. Mehboob would direct his first six films for the production house across a period of four years with the last being Alibaba (1940) and make them a small fortune. He launched his own production house with Aurat.
T is for Thief: His first assignment on a movie was in a silent version of Ali Baba And The 40 Thieves. He played one of the thieves and despite it being a minor role, he was overjoyed. For the three years that followed he had only background roles, but loved the medium and used it as an opportunity to learn. He got his first close up, thanks to his horsemanship ability in the film Shirin Khusru (1929). Years later he would direct a movie about Ali Baba.
U is for Unlucky: Mehboob desperately wanted to be a big movie star and came close a couple of times. He was considered for the lead role in India’s first talkie Alam Ara (1931), but was replaced by big star Master Vithal. He was also in contention to play the lead role in Lure Of The City (1934), but that went to newcomer Motilal, who went on to become a big star. Despite being a talented actor, he continued losing lead roles and finally turned his hands to directing in 1935.
V is for Village: Mehboob was born in 1906 in a small village named Sarar in Gujarat and became a movie fan early on, thanks to the touring mobile cinemas taking the new medium to remote parts of India. The star-struck youngster left home for Bombay to become an actor as a 16-year-old, but was brought back by his family. He was married off as a teenager and had a child to support a few years later. The hopeful returned to Bombay with three rupees in his pocket when in his early twenties and took his first steps to greatness.
W is for West: After the magnificent success of Mother India all eyes were on Mehboob to see what he would do next and that is when he came close to working in the west. He rubbed shoulders with A-list international stars and had discussions with major filmmakers in Hollywood to do a big budget co-production on a film about the Taj Mahal, but their terms, including using non-Indian actors, didn’t suit him and the deal fell through.
X is for X Factor: The special quality that set the visionary filmmaker apart from others was his desire to think big. He went from being a villager having an impossible dream of becoming an actor to being a director who became the first to introduce larger-than-life ideas. This inspired those around him to reach beyond the skies and for the stars.
Y is for Youngster: The director discovered a child from the slums named Sajid Khan and cast him as the young Sunil Dutt in Mother India. He would later adopt the impoverished youngster and give him a key role in his last directorial venture Son Of India (1962). Sajid Khan would go on to have a successful acting career, which included in the USA after his adopted father passed away.
Z is for Zero regrets: The director lived life on his own terms until the end and didn’t regret the decisions he made, whether that was turning down Hollywood, replacing actors or giving away successful subjects to other filmmakers. He owned his mistakes, celebrated the successes of those around him, blazed a trail and created magic on the big screen, which remains to this day.
Susan Stronge was understandably a little emotional as she spoke to Eastern Eye last Monday (5), the final day of the exhibition on The Great Mughals: Art, Architecture and Opulence, the exhibition she curated at the Victoria and Albert Museum.
The exhibition opened on 9 November 2024 to celebrate “the extraordinary creative output and internationalist culture of the golden age of the Mughal court (about 1560–1660), during the reigns of its most famous emperors: Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan.”
There was a large crowd on the last day to catch one more glimpse of the jewellery, paintings, armour, textiles, carpets and other works of art before they were taken down to make way for the next exhibition, Marie Antoinette Style: Shaped by the most fashionable queen in history, in September.
By any reckoning, The Great Mughals has been a huge success. On the final day, Stronge wandered through the gallery, listening to visitors’ chatter – few of them aware she was the curator who had selected the objects now holding them spellbound.
A gem-set dagger, pendant and flask
“I’ll miss it when it goes,” she admitted. “But I’m very, very pleased it’s been so successful and people have obviously enjoyed it. I quite liked eavesdropping on people who are talking to each other about the objects. I heard a couple who were looking at the jewelled jade pendant that arguably could have been made for Jahangir. The chap looked at it and said it was worth coming just to see that one piece. I thought that was fantastic.
“I am struck by the number of people who tell me they have been two, three, four, five, even 10 times. I have a Pakistani friend from Lahore, who is now in London, and he was coming every Friday and he was in week six.”
The Great Mughals was Stronge’s swansong after 49 years at the V&A. She formally retired in February as senior curator in the Asian department, where she had mentored many over the decades. Another of her exhibitions that she feels has left “a significant legacy” was The Art of the Sikh Kingdoms in 1999.
She said: “I have got a three-year position in the museum as an honorary senior research fellow in the research department of the V&A Research Institute.”
Although she is now recognised as a leading scholar in Sikh and Mughal art, she feels she came into the field almost by accident.
“A happy accident,” she acknowledged.
A model of the cenotaph of Mumtaz Mahal
She is a Yorkshire girl who grew up in Ripon in a family where visiting museums wasn’t the done thing. She initially did voluntary work in Norwich, at the Castle Museum and in Strangers’ Hall, a Grade I listed building. She didn’t know it then, but her life was set to change when she applied for, and got, a job as an assistant at the V&A in 1976.
“I was told at the interview I’d be in ceramics, metalwork or the press office,” she recalled. “When I turned up for work, the first day, they said, ‘Oh, you are in (what was then) the Indian section.’ This was a surprise, but also disconcerting, because I knew nothing about India, its history and culture. The keeper of the department was John Irwin, who was a very distinguished textile historian.
“I did an MA at SOAS in South Asia studies and was taught by John Burton-Page, who was a fantastic teacher of Mughal architecture and art. It snowballed from there as I got more and more interested. We did interesting exhibitions (at the V&A) under Robert Skelton’s leadership. We did Arts of Bengal in 1979. No two years were the same. We were given so many opportunities.”
Her interest in Mughal art “evolved over many years. I’ve been teaching a lot on South Asian art courses”.
She found the Western way of defining fine or decorative art “did not apply at all to Mughal or other Eastern arts. So, I started thinking about how to present it.
“I did a book many years ago (2010) called Made for Mughal Emperors: Royal Treasures from Hindustan which was published by Roli in India. I did it by theme, and took things like the institution of the royal household, the imperial treasury. It was much more rooted in telling the cultural story of the history and atmosphere of the court.”
She likes the word “Hindustan”, because the art of pre-Partition India takes in present-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Myanmar. It was also what the Mughals called their own territories.
Coming to the present, she said that when the V&A’s current director, Tristram Hunt, “said he would like a South Asian exhibition, I suggested The Great Mughals, and it was added to the schedule – though plans were later disrupted by the pandemic.”
And, a floorspread
She began by considering the objects she could pick, and is grateful for the loans from the Al-Sabah collection in Kuwait. She said the late Sheikh Nasser “had an absolute passion for Mughal art”, and his wife, Sheikha Hussa, had been “incredibly generous”.
Stronge offered an insight into her approach to curating the exhibition: “I wanted to show the very great art produced over 100 years under Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan. I also wanted to explain something of the history and the cultural context, and also show how hybrid the culture was. That is reflected in the hybridity of the art.
“In the West you tend to see Hindu and Muslim in completely separate categories. That’s not the reality. People share in each other’s religious festivals. That’s why in the studies of art history, ‘Islamic art’ is an almost meaningless term.
“Art historians (in the West) can’t quite place the Mughal empire, because it is not purely Islamic. The rulers are Muslim, but the majority of the population was Hindu. Akbar had Hindu wives and Jahangir had a Hindu mother. It’s not something that fits into Western categorisation. It’s much more hybrid. That’s something I wanted to get across – and how remarkable the artists were. Most of us, certainly me, had never heard of them before I joined the V&A. People like Ustad Mansur, Abu’l-Hasan, and the Iranian master Sa’ida Gilani, a goldsmith who crafted jade artefacts. What is so frustrating is how little we know about their lives or backgrounds.
“The thing that surprises many people is the primacy of the Persian language in the Mughal courts. It was the cultural language of the court, whether you were Hindu or Muslim. One of the leading poets under Jahangir was a Brahmin writing in Persian. I wanted to show the internationalism of the court, the importance of the Persian language and the beauty of the objects. Then there are things, like enamelling, which is a difficult craft. It comes from a foreign technique but becomes completely Mughal and sensational.”
Some of the craft techniques had survived, passed down from one generation to the next.
“There’s this wonderful continuity,” she commented.
She said the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, for example, was trying to revive “the craft of inlaying wood with mother of pearl. They wanted to copy a canopy that had been made in Gujarat and moved to a shrine in Nizamuddin in Delhi. They wanted to put it in their new museum. And, in doing so, they revived a craft that had been completely lost.
“They had to reinvent it almost by trial and error, and they’ve done it to perfection. We showed a short film about the technique in the exhibition.”
Perhaps most important of all, what her exhibition shows is that the Mughals were and remain an integral part of India, its history and its culture.
“If you remove them (from India’s history), you’re removing some of the greatest monuments in the world from the narrative, aren’t you?” she pointed out.
“How do you explain the Taj Mahal, the forts in Delhi and Agra, the endless tombs and monuments? If you don’t know the historical context, you’re losing a lot. It’s something to be proud of.
“If you’ve got a country with a Taj Mahal, it’s something to celebrate.”
Darren Henley posed the question: “What’s our higher aim at the Arts Council?” And he offered the answer: “If I have my three words, it’s ‘creating happier lives’.” He firmly believes the arts bring happiness.
In the 10 years he has travelled to every corner of England as chief executive of Arts Council England, Henley has been greatly encouraged by the British Asian artistic fraternity. Many are beholden to the Arts Council.
He spoke warmly, for instance, of Indhu Rubasingham’s inaugural programme as artistic director of the National Theatre, and also of others such as dancer Sita Patel, Milap Fest in Liverpool, and the Rifco Theatre Company in Watford.
Speaking ahead of Eastern Eye’s annual Arts, Culture & Theatre Awards (ACTA) next Friday (23), he displayed a remarkable mastery of his subject – which is also evident in the latest edition of his book, The Arts Dividend: How Investment in Culture Creates Happier Lives.
Darren Henley's book
First written in 2016, the book was revised in 2020, just before the pandemic, and again in 2025. Henley sees parallels between his work and a classic hailed as “the finest book about England and the English”.
Henley writes: “Although I can’t claim to write with anything approaching his supreme elegance, style or enduring impact, I like to think that this book follows in the tradition of JB Priestley’s 1934 classic, English Journey.”
That said, Henley is lucid and clear: “Like Priestley, I hope to shine a spotlight on parts of England – and their artists, arts organisations, museums and libraries – that have not always enjoyed the nationwide attention they deserve, nor the benefits such attention can bring.
“Unlike Priestley, I cannot lay claim to the best subtitle of any work in this genre: ‘Being a rambling but truthful account of what one man saw and heard and felt and thought during a journey through England during the autumn of the year 1933.’ But this, too, is a book rooted in the reality of what I have witnessed on a non-stop journey through villages, towns and cities right across England.
“It is, I suppose, my own rambling, but truthful account of what I saw and heard and felt and thought as I journeyed through England’s arts and culture scene some nine decades after Priestley did.”
In his First Word, Henley says: “My central argument – that public investment in art and culture can help people to lead happier, healthier, more fulfilling lives – remains the same.”
Indhu Rubasingham
On “Reflecting Everyone’s Diversity”, he seeks to be inclusive: “When I talk about diversity in this book, I am referring to people who possess one or more of the personal characteristics that are protected under the law by the Equality Act of 2010: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation.”
He states: “The colour of an actor’s skin shouldn’t be something that needs to be remarked on here. But I believe I must, because there is still a long way to go in the creative industries to ensure that our workforce is sufficiently reflective of the way England looks today.”
Like Priestley, Henley has also focused on Bradford: “During my visits to Bradford over the past few years, I have always been left buzzing with excitement by the Bradford Literature Festival, under the leadership of Syima Aslam. Its artistic programming, which has the explicit aim of reflecting the work of people from all communities, has created one of the most diverse UK literary festivals in existence. With investment from Bradford University, Bradford Metropolitan District Council and Arts Council England, Syima and her team have created a cultural and literary festival designed for everyone in the city. Now, with increased national and international focus on Bradford as UK City of Culture 2025 – and the largest investment in literature of any of Arts Council England’s National Portfolio Organisations – more people will come to enjoy the artistic breadth and richness that the festival has to offer.”
Creative director Shanaz Gulzar and executive director Dan Bates at the launch of Bradford 2025 UK City of Culture, where Syima Aslam’s literature festival is central to the city’s arts scene
He also writes of catching Peanut Butter & Blueberries at the Kiln Theatre in Kilburn. Directed by Sameena Hussain, this beautiful, warm and witty debut full-length play by Suhaiymah Manzoor-Khan featured superb performances by Humera Syed and Usaamah Ibraheem Hussain.
This was, of course, where Rubasingham served as artistic director before breaking the glass ceiling to lead the National Theatre.
In his interview with Eastern Eye, conducted in the offices of the Arts Council in London, Henley stressed: “The National is really important. It is our national theatre. They do great work here in London, but they also have a network of work that we invest in as it takes it round the country.”
It has helped the play Dear England to go on tour.
The National gets more than £16 million (₹1.68 billion) from the Arts Council and £25 million (₹2.63 billion) in capital investment from the government.
He talked about Rubasingham’s appointment, a landmark in the evolution of British Asian artists: “Indhu’s is a fantastic, brilliant appointment for the National Theatre.
“I think she’s a very intelligent, thoughtful theatre practitioner. The work that she did at Kiln was absolutely outstanding. She will be a really exciting, creative leader at the National Theatre.” He said her inaugural programme “has been well received. She’ll enable a new generation of other directors and writers to come to the stage. She’s looking out to the world, in terms of what we can take from here, our National Theatre, to the world, but also what can we bring from the world to our National Theatre.”
Recalling some of the British Asian performances he had found memorable, he said: “Sita Patel did a fantastic Rite of Spring with the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra, which I saw at Sadler’s Wells. She’s a dance artist, and they worked together on that. I’m very fond of the work that Milap Fest does in Liverpool. In terms of a British Asian theatre company, the work that Rifco do, based at Watford Palace, is really exciting. It’s growing, and talking to all sorts of audiences from all sorts of backgrounds.”
A still from the BBC crime drama Virdee, featuring Staz Nair and Aysha Kala
He mentioned Rifco’s forthcoming production of Surinderella: “They are going to do a fusion of Bollywood and pantomime. I haven’t seen that anywhere before. Each has a set of rules around which they do things. I’m curious to see how those two things fuse together.”
As in his book, he talked to Eastern Eye about the Arts Council’s investment in Bradford. With a large Muslim population, it is, of course, very different from the almost exclusively white city that Bradford-born Priestley had encountered.
“Bradford ’25 is a city where we have put a lot of money in,” confirmed Henley. “It’s created some really interesting and exciting artwork. It’s changing the stories that people who live there tell about the place. It’s making them a more demanding, more entitled audience. That’s a really positive thing we want. I want people to feel comfortable about demanding more of us as an investor in their artistic and cultural lives. They should. It’s their right.”
In passing, he praised BBC TV’s six-part crime drama Virdee, set in Bradford and based on local author A A Dhand’s novel City of Sinners.
He commented: “I suppose what’s interesting for someone like me is we are making an investment in creative people, and you don’t always know what’s going to come out of that. And I love it when everyone gets it right. That’s where innovation happens.”
He does not see British Asian arts being in a ghetto and separate from the mainstream: “This is not something that should be on the margins. You have amazing artists who are making amazing work for audiences. Sometimes, they will make work for discrete audiences and smaller groupings, but, often, they’ll make work for audiences from every background, because in the end, we’re talking about stories, we’re talking about artistic moments.”
Henley resolved right at the outset that far from working from home or in his office, he would spend half the week travelling around England. In his book, he writes: “After 18 months in the job, I stopped counting the places that I’d been to. By then, my tally had reached 157 different villages, towns and cities around England. In fact, I suspect that I’ve seen more artistic performances and exhibitions, visited more cultural organisations, and met more artists and art groups than anyone else in England during the past decade. Doing the job that I do, that’s exactly as it should be.”
Publicity poster for Rifco’s upcoming production Surinderella
All being well, he is expected to attend this year’s ACTA ceremony – and maintain the tradition of announcing the winner of the Emerging Artist category.
It was one of his colleagues who first tipped him off about Priestley’s English Journey many years ago.
Although he has long given up keeping a tally, he reassured Eastern Eye: “I’ve probably been everywhere that you’ve been on a train. I try to get off and go to those places. Obviously, I’ve been to all the big cities, but also to the towns that surround those places and to a lot of rural areas as well. I’ve been literally everywhere from Cumbria to Cornwall, Northumberland to Kent. I’ve tried to spread my time over the whole country to get a real understanding of the infrastructure and what makes our cultural sector. A big part of my job is advocating to government and the value of the investment they put into it.”
According to the government’s own figures, the creative industries earned the UK £124 billion (₹13 trillion) in 2023. No one has assessed what the British Asian contribution is, but it must now be significant. That is likely to grow because of the cultural agreement between the UK and India recently signed by culture secretary Lisa Nandy during a trip to Mumbai and Delhi.
Arts Council England, whose 10-year strategy for creativity runs from 2020 to 2030, will work closely with the Labour government and the culture secretary of the day. “But we work at arm’s length from the government,” Henley made clear. “One of the things that’s crucial for us is that artists have the freedom to make the work they want to make, have the conversations they want to have, have the thoughts and innovation they want to have.”
Altogether, to the 1,000 National Portfolio Organisations supported by the Arts Council, 275 new ones were added in the funding round in 2023.
JB Priestley’s English Journey
“We brought a lot of new organisations into the fold,” Henley pointed out. “I also believe passionately, that we need to have organisations that are making work and are led by people reflective of the whole country. New writing is important. New performers, new ways of doing things are important. Sometimes, it’s older or more traditional stories, but told in a completely new context. Shakespeare is utterly relevant. If you drill down into what Shakespeare is, it’s a set of stories often about relationships or situations that were obviously written a long time ago, but they’re absolutely relevant today.”
He does not like the word “subsidise” to describe the grants given by the Arts Council. “We make an investment, because I think ‘subsidised’ feels like market failure,” he argued. “Investment is more about possibility. We invest public money into individuals, artists and organisations, and we do that to improve people’s lives. The work that they do makes other people’s lives better. There’s no nobler thing to do than public investment to create happier lives. Happiness is a word I want to sort of reclaim. I don’t think it’s a weak word. Why are we on this earth if we don’t want to be happy? Isn’t it amazing that when you see a great performance, a dance or music or theatre, or you go to a gallery and see an amazing picture in front of you, it can take you to a different place? We need to talk about happiness more. We need to understand the things that make life worth living.
Rakesh Chaurasia performing at a Milap event
“It is also worth saying that art and culture and artists can also actually help conversations around the tougher things in life as well. That’s something quite unique that an artist can curate.”
He could have been referring to a play like Tanika Gupta’s A Tupperware of Ashes, which premiered at the National last year and dealt with the subject of dementia.
The Arts Council has a programme in Leicester called Talent 25, in which children are selected and exposed to museums, galleries, concerts and other cultural experiences over 25 years to assess what effect such an intervention has on their lives.
Poster for Peanut Butter & Blueberries, staged at the Kiln Theatre
Henley’s views on getting children to enjoy the arts will be taken to heart, especially by British Asian parents. He referred to one museum “where the chief executive bought a load of knee pads for his colleagues, and they went round on their knees to see what it would be like to be a toddler or a small child, what they could and couldn’t see”.
“Children are a really important audience,” he said, adding their experiences have to be age-appropriate. “We want to create the artists and also the audiences of the future. To be absolutely clear, you’ve got to be able to read and write, you’ve got to be able to add up. You should have an understanding of science and languages. What we need to make sure is we build the rounded human beings that we want to see in our society. Music and drama and art and design should be part of the core curriculum at school. For me, the three pillars of a really strong education for any young person are numeracy, literacy and creativity.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Deepa Paul explores non-monogamy, commitment and romance in her new book
It began as a 1,200-words essay, sort of a frequently asked questions (FAQ) explainer of being in an open marriage, before culminating in a bidding war involving multiple major publishing houses.
Her new book 'Ask Me How It Works'Instagram/ storiesbydeepa
Deepa Paul’s Ask Me How It Works does what it says on the tin. It’s her story of being in a committed marriage with her husband of 17 years, while the couple also date other people, with each other’s knowledge.
However, seven or eight years ago, no one was interested in publishing it, said Paul. When a writing coach suggested it was more than an essay, she wrote the draft and that led to a publishing deal.
“It’s basically almost unchanged from where I began. There was no grand vision. It was – what have I experienced, what have I learned from it, and what can I share?” Paul said.
She recalled a writing habit “to process my own experiences and to understand what’s going on in my life”.
Paul added, “Initially I started writing mainly for myself. There was a point at which I was receiving so many questions from men who I was open with on dating apps, and I remember thinking as a joke, almost like, ‘What if I could just send them something that would make my life easier.’”
“In the beginning it was called Ask Me How It Works:frequently asked questions about my open marriage. And this essay just got longer and longer.”
Paul, a half-Indian, half-Filipina writer, lives with her husband, Marcus, in Amsterdam, having moved there from Manila, where they both grew up. The couple have a young daughter, and Paul also has a boyfriend of five years in the city.
She was polyamorous at the time of writing the book, but said she is currently not dating anyone else.
Each chapter in her book dwells on the many questions raised by Paul’s curious dates – from how it started to the rules the couple follow, feelings, love and therapy.
“It’s always been about self discovery,” Paul said. “My preferred method of growth is to put myself in new situations and see how I adapt.
“It sounds very chaotic and maybe stressful for a lot of people, but I value adaptability and flexibility and being able to find out about myself through the mirror of relationships.
“I believe that an encounter with somebody – whether it’s for one night or for months or years or a lifetime – can mirror back to you things about yourself that you’ve never saw before.”
Paul was raised in the Philippines (the country is predominantly Catholic and divorce is banned), but when she moved to the Netherlands, realised there were opportunities to explore relationships outside her marriage. Over the course of more than a dozen chapters, she charts her journey as she and her husband seek encounters outside their marriage. Both are certain, however, that they want to be in the marriage and are committed to raising a family together.
Paul explained how her idea of marriage has transformed over time.
“What I learned from my parents, seeing their picture of love and commitment, was that we would build a life together, that we had shared goals and we would achieve them together,” she said.
“A family was definitely part of it. It felt like a big adventure we could go on together. Me moving to Singapore to be with him, (it) felt like I was giving a lot, but it also felt adventurous. Then moving to Amsterdam was another adventure. I saw marriage as a series of adventures for which I had found a partner.
“Now, I would say that’s changed in the sense that there’s much less ‘adventuring’. It’s more realistic that we are building a life together. We have shared goals, and those evolve over time.
“But now I believe our commitment is much more fluid and flexible, because it accommodates the versions of ourselves we can become as life changes. Motherhood was a big change, migration was a massive change, cancer was a huge change (Paul was diagnosed last year, underwent treatment and is now cancer-free).
“So, now we get to check in with each other and say, ‘okay, what does commitment look like for us, for the people we are now? It’s a lot more familiar, but it’s also flexible.”
Life in Amsterdam could not be more in contrast to Manila. In fact, in one of the final chapters, Paul explains what the book is about to her pre-teen daughter and waits tentatively for her response.
Her reaction? Paul and Marcus are not the only ones in their daughter’s class to have an open marriage.
“Welcome to Amsterdam!” she writes. “If I stayed in Manila, I don’t think I would have ever realised that non-monogamy is an option. I came to Amsterdam and I was almost shocked at how accepted it is – that it is an option available for us as a relationship style.”
Paul explores the many facets of relationships – established, committed or casual – as she and Marcus ‘open up’ their marriage. Having dating rules, establishing boundaries, testing them, adapting, building trust, maintaining faith in each other, therapy, co-parenting, pursuing careers and Covid lockdowns – Ask Me How It Works answers all the questions readers could possibly be curious about.
She said the effort was worth it. “I find working on relationships fulfilling. I think I’m a relationship nerd. I love talking about attachment styles and I believe the greatest fulfilment I derive from life is from relationships. It’s not from possessions or experiences. I love figuring out relationships – how somebody wants to be loved, what makes them feel special, feel safe.
“And then, when I realised I can also give that to them, I found myself expanding. I thought, ‘Oh, I didn’t think I could love this way, I didn’t think I could care for someone in this specific manner.’ And, somehow, I managed to keep track of all of them.”
Paul added, “I’m also very into the idea of experiencing pleasure in different ways, and I learned so much about my desires, but also my body. I have a really good relationship with my body – through the mirror of other people, and I do love that I have an identity.
“I’m encouraged and allowed to build an identity for myself that doesn’t revolve around being a wife and a mother. I can be 100 per cent a good wife and mother, but also be 100 per cent myself.
“And it’s not a trade-off. So, for me, that’s worth the extra effort, of what people think is so tiring.”
Although Paul is not dating anyone else apart from her boyfriend, she has seen a shift in the approach to monogamous and non-monogamous relationships, saying that while the latter are more accepted now, it’s not yet mainstream.
She has also observed how women in some conservative societies feel about desire. “In terms of attraction and desire, we’re taught that it’s a very destructive force, but it is also a force of great power – it can make people look and feel and come alive and be really present in their senses,” Paul said.
“I take a lot of inspiration, for example, from Audre Lorde’s essay The uses of erotic where she says, ‘once you’ve tapped into something that really gives you joy and aliveness, it’s like you can’t turn it off.’ It feeds so much into our lives and women are sort of stopped from doing that.”
She added, “But then, when we are at our most fully expressed and alive and just enjoying the deliciousness of life, who immediately benefits? Family and society, as well.”
Paul revealed she considered writing the book under a pseudonym.
However, she said, “If I cannot stand by my choices, my ups and my downs and my mistakes, and I can’t put my name and my face on it, then shame still has power over me.
“For me, it’s a powerful exercise to say, ‘Yeah, I did all of this and I made these mistakes, I cleaned them up, and I somehow turned them into a life that I love, with all the people I love along with me for the ride.
“If I had kept hiding that, I would not really have been freed,” she said.
“Regardless of whether you are monogamous or non-monogamous, people are messy.
“Life is unpredictable, emotions are messy. So we just do the best we can with the tools we have.”
Ask Me How It Works: Love in an Open Marriage by Deepa Paul, published by Viking, is out now
Keep ReadingShow less
Young participants have also been involved in backstage roles
The National Theatre’s annual Connections Festival will return this June, celebrating its 30th anniversary with a week-long programme of youth theatre performances from across the UK.
Running from 24 to 28 June, the festival will also mark the reopening of the Dorfman Theatre, which has been closed since November 2024 for government-funded refurbishment works.
Over the past three months, more than 5,000 young people from over 270 schools and youth theatre groups have performed in venues across 33 professional stages nationwide. From this wide participation, ten theatre groups have been selected to perform at the National Theatre in London.
Each group will stage one of ten newly commissioned plays, offering young performers the opportunity to explore contemporary themes including identity, climate change, and community.
The selected groups and their plays are:
Fresh Air by Vickie Donoghue – Central Foundation Boys’ School, London
Ravers by Rikki Beadle-Blair – HOME Young Company, Manchester
Mia and the Fish by Satinder Chohan – Abbey Grange Academy, Leeds
The Company of Trees by Jane Bodie – Hamilton District Youth Theatre, Lanarkshire
Their Name is Joy by May Sumbwanyambe – Nottingham Girls Academy Theatre Company
Saba’s Swim by Danusia Samal – Central Youth Theatre, Wolverhampton
Normalised by Amanda Verlaque – Brassneck Youth, Belfast
No Regrets by Gary McNair – Glasgow Acting Academy
Brain Play by Chloë Lawrence-Taylor and Paul Sirett – Chatham and Clarendon Grammar School, Ramsgate
YOU 2.0 by Alys Metcalf – Everyman Youth Theatre, Cardiff
Young participants have also been involved in backstage roles, including lighting, costume design, directing and composing, helping to realise their productions from start to finish.
Indhu Rubasingham, Director and Co-Chief Executive of the National Theatre, said: “I am really pleased to welcome ten youth groups from all corners of the UK to the NT for this landmark anniversary festival of Connections. Everyone should have the opportunity to experience the power of theatre-making.”
Since launching, the festival has engaged over 125,000 young people, with former participants including actors Keira Knightley, David Oyelowo, Rose Ayling-Ellis, and Callum Scott Howells.
Each year, ten new plays are commissioned for Connections, contributing to a growing archive of over 235 scripts written specifically for young performers.
Tickets are available for £5 per show, or £8 for two performances in one evening. All shows will feature captioning for accessibility.
Keep ReadingShow less
Crossed creative horizons and collaborated with global talent
Whether it is her cool songs like Checka, Piya Piya Calling and Siste Dans, cutting-edgeEP Running Deep, or acclaimed 2024 debut album Shahrazad, Delara has consistently crossed creative horizons and collaborated with global talent.
The award-winning Norwegian singer has lit up the live scene, clocked millions of streams, and connected with diverse cultures through her eclectic music. The fabulously forward-thinking talent has added to her impressive achievements with the newly released Kalash Reimagined, a bold collaboration with Indian singer Charan, Pakistani producer Talal Qureshi and Jamaican-American rapper BEAM.
Eastern Eye caught up with Delara to discuss her music, inspirations, future hopes and unique new single.
Her new track, Kalash ReimaginedInstagram/ amandadelara
What first connected you to music?
I think music was always part of my life before I even knew what it meant to me. I grew up in a household where my parents would talk about life and politics around the dinner table. That energy of emotion, reflection and curiosity somehow found its way into the songs I started writing. Music became my space for understanding myself and the world around me.
How do you reflect on your music journey so far?
I’m proud of how much I’ve dared to evolve. From the start, I didn’t take the easiest route. I sang about politics and personal struggles when people told me not to. But I’ve always trusted that staying true to myself would lead me to where I’m meant to go. That has shaped me into the artist I am today – a mix of experimentation, boldness and vulnerability.
Which of your songs is closest to your heart?
That’s a hard one, but Unbound will always be very close to me. I wrote it during a time when I was thinking a lot about the impermanence of life, and how nothing and no one lasts forever. The relationship I have with my mother, who means everything to me, inspired much of that song. Having her in the music video made it even more emotional and personal.
How much did the acclaim your debut album received mean to you?
Of course, I’m grateful for the recognition, but I try not to get too caught up in critical acclaim. What means the most to me is the feedback I get from listeners – people who send me messages or come up to me after shows saying a song helped them through something. That’s what gives me confidence and keeps me creating.
Tell us about Kalash Reimagined.
Kalash Reimagined takes the original track to new heights by merging powerful voices and sounds from different parts of the world. After working on Piya Piya with Coke Studio last year, it felt natural to expand on this fusion of cultures. The remix blends south Asian sounds, Jamaican energy and Norwegian–Iranian influences to create something bold and deeply emotional. It is a celebration of what can grow when different worlds collide.
What was it like collaborating with Charan, Talal Qureshi and BEAM?
Collaborating with Charan, Talal and BEAM was an amazing experience. Charan brought his unique perspective and fresh energy to the track. Talal’s creativity and musical vision really helped elevate the sound, while BEAM’s raw intensity added something special. It felt like a real meeting of different worlds, with voices that had something real to say. The collaboration was a true exchange of energy and ideas, and it came together beautifully.
How would you describe this track?
It’s a powerful fusion of sounds and emotions. Kalash Reimagined is bold, raw and unapologetic – yet playful and full of energy. The track exists in the spaces between cultures, not trying to represent everything but highlighting what can grow when worlds collide. It celebrates shared experiences and the beautiful complexity that emerges from blending different backgrounds.
Who are you hoping this song connects with?
I hope this track resonates with anyone who feels caught between cultures or identities. It is for those who do not fit neatly into one box. Whether you are from south Asia, the diaspora, the Caribbean or anywhere in between, I want the song to speak to those who feel empowered by blending different worlds – and who are open to the beauty that comes from that fusion.
What can we expect next from you?
There is a lot on the horizon. I’m about to announce my biggest headliner show yet, which I’m incredibly excited about. I’m also working on new music and visual projects that will push boundaries, along with more cross-cultural collaborations like Kalash Reimagined. The goal is always to connect sounds and stories in unexpected ways. I’m exploring fresh creative paths, keeping things organic and letting ideas flow freely.
Who would you love to collaborate with? There are so many, but right now I would love to work with artists who challenge genres and tell strong stories – people like Bad Bunny, Rosalía, Frank Ocean or even Raveena. Artists who are not afraid to blend cultures and sounds.
What kind of music dominates your personal playlist?
It’s a mix of many things. But with summer approaching, there is a lot of Afro, reggaeton, salsa, r’n’b and hip hop. I’ve actually created a personal playlist that I share with my listeners.
What inspires you as an artist?
Life itself – my family, friends, conversations with strangers, travelling, latenight thoughts, missing home, or wondering what home even means. I get inspired by contradictions, and those quiet moments of reflection when I’m not even trying to create.
Why do you love music?
When I’m creating music, I feel the most free. It is a space where only your mind, creativity and ideas matter – not how you look or how others see you. Music was the first place where I felt truly seen and heard. It’s a powerful force of connection, the closest thing we have to real magic – a universal language that everyone understands. In just seconds, music can make us feel a little less alone. How can you not love that?