Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Malala’s experiences of terrorism and trolling

By Amit Roy

POLITICS in Britain has become so toxic, even at university, that Malala Yousafzai has been trolled for voicing her support for a close friend who was standing to be president of the Oxford University Conservative Association.


Intentionally or otherwise, the Daily Telegraph ran the Malala sto­ry above the horrific report of Sam­uel Paty, a 47-year-old teacher in Paris, who was beheaded by Abdoulakh A, 18, who was born in Mos­cow of Chechen origin and given refugee status by France.

Paty, who taught history and ge­ography, had been targeted by an angry father after the former had shown cartoons of the Prophet Mu­hammad during a class about free­dom of speech, in relation to the Charlie Hebdo case.

Is there a link between trolling and terrorism? Probably not in most cases, but it also does not take much to ignite religious fanaticism – as we have seen all too often in India and Pakistan. Therefore, people should be careful not to inflame passions.

The trolling of Malala is also dis­turbing, considering she came to Britain in 2012 after a Taliban attack in which she was shot in the head.

In a Facebook message, since de­leted, Malala, 23, who graduated from Oxford this summer with a degree in PPE, wrote: “Hi everyone! Those who are members of the Ox­ford University (Conservative) As­sociation may have heard that their elections are this Wednesday.

“One of my best friends Kia Wil­liams is running for president in a contested election. Kia has worked so hard putting her team and mani­festo together and I genuinely think she and her team will do an amaz­ing job if elected.”

Malala, who won the Nobel Peace Prize, aged 17, in 2014, made it clear: “This endorsement is not a reflection of my personal political views – I just really think my friends are talented people who deserve the opportunity to improve the As­sociation they care about.”

In response, one Twitter account posted: “So my hate for her all this time wasn’t unprovoked.”

Another called for her to be kicked out of the country: “Deport the sweaty beg.”

Condemning the abuse of Mala­la, environment minister and Con­servative peer Zac Goldsmith said: “I wonder what these weirdos at­tacking Malala (for having a Con­servative friend) think qualifies them to judge this extraordinary woman? What have they done with their lives, other than pouring inco­herent and trivial hatreds through their keyboards.”

Actress Tracy-Ann Oberman also reacted: “I mean it’s Malala. A girl who was shot through the head by the Taliban for trying to go to school and get an education.”

More For You

Shabana Mahmood’s hard line on asylum risks repeating Tory failures

Mahmood's plans are uncannily similar to Priti Patel’s new asylum law in 2022

Getty Images

Shabana Mahmood’s hard line on asylum risks repeating Tory failures

Shabana Mahmood is already the third British Asian woman to be a home secretary talking tough on asylum. That shows how much ethnic diversity in high office has accelerated. No Asian woman had ever been an MP before Mahmood and Priti Patel were elected in May 2010. But that Mahmood is so closely following Patel’s agenda now casts doubt on how far the Labour government’s new asylum proposals can deliver control in the Channel or rebuild public confidence in the system.

Mahmood’s core mission is to grip the asylum issue: she declares her reforms to be the most significant since the 1950s. Yet, they are uncannily similar to Priti Patel’s new asylum law in 2022 – which also proposed asylum seekers getting only 30 months of temporary protection. Suella Braverman then went even further – pledging that no asylum claims would get heard at all. By memory-holing these efforts, Mahmood misses crucial lessons of why they failed. If “pull factors” of the UK asylum design were the key to small boat arrivals, Patel and Braverman would have stopped the boats before the election.

Keep ReadingShow less