Pramod Thomas is a senior correspondent with Asian Media Group since 2020, bringing 19 years of journalism experience across business, politics, sports, communities, and international relations. His career spans both traditional and digital media platforms, with eight years specifically focused on digital journalism. This blend of experience positions him well to navigate the evolving media landscape and deliver content across various formats. He has worked with national and international media organisations, giving him a broad perspective on global news trends and reporting standards.
PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer is re-evaluating a Tory-endorsed initiative to hike the salary threshold for migrant spouses, reported the Telegraph.
The required income for bringing a foreign spouse to the UK was elevated from £18,600 to £29,000 earlier this year, aiming to curtail net migration by approximately 300,000.
According to the report, home secretary Yvette Cooper has delayed raising the threshold to £38,700 next year and requested the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) to review the appropriate level for the threshold.
In a statement to Parliament, Cooper highlighted the need to balance respect for family life with the economic wellbeing of the UK. She confirmed that the current threshold of £29,000 would remain unchanged until the MAC completes its review.
“The Minimum Income Requirement (for the family visa) is currently set at £29,000 and there will be no further changes until the MAC review is complete," she was quoted as saying.
The proposal to increase the threshold to £38,700, announced last December by then home secretary James Cleverly, faced significant opposition.
Migration experts warned that the higher threshold could lead to cancelled weddings and disrupted relationships for thousands of couples. Additionally, Home Office officials had advised against the increase, suggesting it could be challenged in court based on family rights and equality laws.
Brian Bell, the current chair of the MAC, also expressed concerns about the policy. He argued that the proposed change would have a minimal impact on net migration while negatively affecting British citizens seeking to bring their foreign partners to the country.
“You should think about the benefit in terms of the welfare of people in Britain. These are British citizens who want to bring their partners with them to live in Britain. There’s a social benefit and a welfare benefit of doing that, which I don’t think should be ignored," he was quoted as saying.
Bell further pointed out that there was no logical justification for setting the threshold at £38,700, a level comparable to the new salary requirement for foreign skilled workers.
In his opinion, the median salary for full-time workers in the UK in 2023 was £34,963.
Originally, the MAC had recommended setting the threshold for spousal visas at a level that would prevent citizens from needing benefits, which led to the initial threshold of £18,600 in 2011.
Although the MAC's review is not expected to be completed until after the summer, it is possible that the committee may recommend a figure lower than the current £29,000, potentially in the mid-£20,000s.
Cooper, however, said that Labour will continue with other Tory measures aimed at reducing net migration, which reached 685,000 in the year to December 2023.
These include restricting foreign students and care workers from bringing family members to the UK, raising the salary threshold for skilled worker visas from £26,200 to £38,700, and eliminating the 20 per cent going rate discount, which allowed employers to pay migrants less than UK workers in shortage occupations.
Furthermore, Cooper has tasked the MAC with exploring ways to reduce the IT and engineering sectors' reliance on foreign workers by increasing training and recruitment of domestic staff.
She stressed the importance of addressing skills shortages and labour market failures within the UK, rather than relying on immigration as a solution.
She added, "Whilst we will always benefit from international skills and talent, including to keep us globally competitive, immigration must not be used as an alternative to tackling skills shortages and labour market failures here in the UK. For that reason, we are setting out a new approach."
UK music industry continue to face systemic barriers that hinder progress, visibility, and career growth – despite decades of contribution and cultural influence, a new report has revealed.
The study, South Asian Soundcheck, published last Tuesday (7), surveyed 349 artists and professionals and found that while many are skilled and ambitious, structural obstacles are still holding them back.
Prepared by Lila, a charity focused on empowering south Asian artists and music professionals, the survey showed that nearly three-quarters of respondents earn some income from music, but only 28 per cent rely on it full time.
More than half struggle to access opportunities or funding, and many said they lack industry networks or knowledge about contracts and rights.
Beyond structural issues, almost half said they face stereotypes about the kind of music they should make; two in five encounter family doubts about music as a career, and one in three has experienced racial discrimination.
Although 69 per cent said there was progress in visibility, but 68 per cent still feel invisible within the industry.
Respondents sought urgent action, including mentorship and networking opportunities, stronger south Asian representation in key industry roles and fairer access to funding.
Veteran musician and composer Viram Jasani, who chaired the Asian Music Circuit and led a national enquiry into south Asian music in 1985, told Eastern Eye the findings were “disheartening”.
“I read the report and my heart sank – it feels as though nothing has changed,” he said.
“Back in 1985, we had already identified the same problems and made clear recommendations for better representation, employment and long-term support. Four decades later, we are still talking about the same issues.”
Jasani, a sitar, tabla and tambura expert, said the report focused mainly on modern genres and overlooked traditional south Asian music, which he believes is central to cultural identity.
“Since colonial times, British attitudes have not changed much,” he said. “If they can erase Indian traditional culture and create a community that lives entirely within an English cultural bubble, then they will have succeeded.”
He added that young south Asian artists were often drawn to Western contemporary music, while neglecting their own heritage.
“We are brilliant in Western genres, but that should come after we are grounded in our traditional shashtriya sangeet (classical music),” he said. “Without that foundation, we lose our sense of identity.”
Jasani also warned a lack of unity within the south Asian community continues to weaken its cultural progress.
He said, “People compete with each other while the world watches. For too long, massaging egos has taken priority over producing the best of our culture.”
According to the survey, one in three has experienced direct racial discrimination. One respondent said, “There are virtually no visible and successful south Asian artists in the mainstream – people simply do not know where to place us.”
Another added: “I want south Asian artists to be part of the collective mainstream industry, not just put on south Asian-specific stages or events.”
While the visibility of south Asian artists has improved, with more names appearing on festival line-ups and in the media, the study revealed this progress remains “surface level”.
Lila’s founder, Vikram Gudi, said the findings show progress has not yet been translated into structural inclusion.
“The data exposes what we call the progress paradox. Seventy-three per cent of the people we surveyed earn some money from music, but only 27 per cent earn enough to rely on it as a sustainable career,” he said.
“The Soundcheck gives us the evidence to enact real change and identifies three essential needs – mentorship, representation, and investment.”
Three-quarters of participants said mentorship from experienced professionals would make the biggest difference to their careers. Many stressed the importance of being guided by people who “understand how the industry works and can connect them to decision-makers”.
Nearly the same proportion called for greater south Asian representation across the music industry – not just on stage, but within executive, programming and production roles at festivals, venues, record labels and streaming services.
Dedicated funding also emerged as a priority, with many describing the current grant systems as inaccessible or ill-suited to the diverse and cross-genre work that defines south Asian creativity today.
Two in five respondents reported that family or community resistance remains a challenge, often due to the perceived instability of a music career. The report argued this scepticism is “economically logical”, when there are so few visible south Asian success stories in the mainstream.
Responding to the report, Indy Vidyalankara, member of the UK Music Diversity Taskforce and BPI Equity & Justice Advisory Group, said: “South Asian music is rich, vibrant, and hugely influential. We need south Asian representation at every level of the ecosystem, plus support and investment to match that influence.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.