Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Labour candidate says name error on ballot paper could have cost her votes

Labour candidate says name error on ballot paper could have cost her votes

By Keri Trigg

A Labour candidate in the Shropshire Council elections says she could have missed out on votes because her name was printed incorrectly on the ballot papers.


Elisabeth Roberts is standing in Harlescott division, which has consistently voted Labour at every election since the council was formed in 2009.

But there are now fears that the mistake could cost the party the seat, with Ms Roberts claiming people who had pledged their support have said they did not recognise the name and therefore did not vote for her.

Roberts said she put ‘Lisa’ on her nomination forms as a name she is also known as, but did not intend for this to be the name on the ballot papers.

When her name appeared as Lisa on the Statement of Persons Nominated, published four weeks ago, she said she contacted the council multiple times to get it corrected – so was shocked to see that the mistake was repeated on the ballot papers yesterday (6).

Shropshire Council has been asked to comment.

Harlescott was previously held by Ioan Jones, who left Labour in 2019 to sit as an independent councillor, but with Jones stepping down the party is hoping Roberts will win the seat back.

Jones was one of only eight Labour councillors elected in Shropshire in 2017. He took 552 votes, beating the Conservative and UKIP candidates who received 324 and 90 votes respectively.

This year Roberts faces opposition from Conservative candidate Jeff Anderson, Liberal Democrat Artur Fejfer and Matt Galliers for the Green Party.

The first declarations are expected this evening, with nine results – totalling 12 seats – to be announced, and the rest to follow throughout the day on Saturday (8). Harlescott result is expected mid-afternoon tomorrow (8).

(Local Democracy Reporting Service)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Instagram

The investigation has raised fresh questions over how harmful content passed Instagram's advertising checks

iStock

How did child abuse ads get approved on Instagram? Investigation finds major moderation lapses

  • Paid adverts promoting child sexual abuse material were reportedly approved by Instagram's automated review system in India.
  • Meta removed several adverts and suspended accounts after being alerted but initially said one reported advert did not violate its policies.
  • The findings have renewed scrutiny over how social media platforms moderate paid advertising and protect children online.

Instagram's advertising moderation system is facing fresh scrutiny after a BBC Eye investigation found that paid adverts promoting child sexual abuse material were approved and displayed to users in India, despite the platform's policies banning such content.

According to the report, the adverts used explicit phrases such as "rape video" and "child video" and directed users to Telegram channels where the illegal material was allegedly sold for as little as ₹99. The findings have raised questions over Instagram's ad moderation system and Meta's content review process, particularly because paid advertisements are meant to undergo checks before they are published.

Keep ReadingShow less