Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Johnson’s commission ‘will keep race disparity on the agenda’

By Sunder Katwala

Director

British Future thinktank


“ACTION this day!” became Winston Churchill’s Second World War watchword. So he might have been looking down quizzically as his successor Boris Johnson announced a new cross-govern­ment commission to look at all aspects of ine­quality, in an article pledging “to resist with every breath of my body” any attempt to remove Churchill’s statue from Parliament Square.

Almost nobody wants to remove the statue of the prime minister who defeated fascism. My own Twitter experiment – canvassing ethnic minority opinion in particular – heard from just two people who would like the statue to go among almost 100 who would keep it.

After the phoney war of Churchill’s statue, we need to address “the substance, not the symbols”, as Johnson put it. But the charge against “yet another review” was led by Labour’s shadow justice secre­tary David Lammy, who told the BBC’s Today pro­gramme that it was a plan concocted on the “back of a fag packet”. Why not implement hundreds of recommendations from “countless” previous re­views, Lammy asked, citing his own 2017 work on criminal justice.

Action, not words, is always a resonant slogan. But dismissing the new commission would be a mistake for those campaigning to keep race equal­ity on the agenda. It offers a route to achieve that goal, especially to sustain the policy salience of race once the headlines move on.

This government will soon be juggling the battle to contain Covid, get out of lockdown, mitigate the deep post-pandemic recession and navigate the return of Brexit too. The bandwidth of ministers and officials has rarely been more stretched. For­mer chancellor Sajid Javid argued that only prime ministerial ownership could secure attention across Whitehall for large-scale, systemic changes that cuts across government departments, while warning that “shining a light on injustices isn’t enough without an action plan to tackle them”.

Johnson’s predecessor Theresa May did put race on the domestic agenda. Her race disparity audit was a more comprehensive study of opportunity and disadvantage than any other major democracy has undertaken. Yet it ran out of steam, having promised that “Explain or Change” action plans would cascade across Whitehall departments. Without the Covid pandemic, and the Black Lives Matter protests, the race audit was set to become an abandoned orphan child of the May administra­tion. So Johnson’s commission has the data as a platform to build on quickly, if it does not choose to reinvent the wheel.

Both left and right underestimate the value of the race data. The left has an excessively fatalistic nar­rative, that nothing ever changes on race inequali­ty, as if half a century of race advocacy and policy had achieved almost nothing. The right has the opposite challenge – celebrating past progress won’t bridge the generational gulf on race without a clear agenda for how the “levelling up” vision will break down the barriers to meritocracy.

Will the opportunity to act get lost in the “culture war”? The ugly counter-protests from violent thugs and the state of online debate suggest a country highly polarised by race – yet new research from Ipsos-Mori shows how much of a distortion this is. The decline of overt racism means that just three per cent of people now think you must be white to be truly British, but 93 per cent disagree. There is scepticism about whether public services yet treat black and Asian people equally. Widespread con­cern about current racial tensions is married with a grounded optimism about the next decade on race – a view that rarely gets a hearing, even though seven out of 10 people share it, across the majority and minority populations.

So what action can unlock that common ground?

First, the government needs to show where it can act ahead of this commission process. It will mark “Windrush Day” next Monday (22), the anniversary of the ship’s arrival. The Home Office has promises to keep in implementing Wendy Williams review: it should make progress this week. Action on Covid-19 ethnic disparities can’t wait until Christmas either.

Second, the commission will need to prioritise. Opportunities for young people would be a good issue on which to focus. The aggregate white/mi­nority gap in educational attainment has closed, with a complex pattern across groups. Non-white Britons are slightly more likely to have a degree than their white British peers. Ethnic opportunity gaps in the workplace – such as differential inter­view rates – need to come under pressure.

Third, race equality must reach the top of every site of economic, cultural and political power. Westminster is much more diverse than a decade ago, yet diversity has flatlined in Britain’s board­rooms: almost none is as diverse as the cabinet. Indeed, a third of FTSE 100 companies and six out of 10 FTSE 350 companies still have all-white boards. The black presence is absurdly miniscule, so corpo­rates tweeting the Black Lives Matter hashtag need to turn symbolic support into real change.

Action this day should be a rule beyond govern­ment too.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less