Pooja was born in Kochi and raised on a mix of newspapers, pop culture, and too many questions. She studied Communicative English and Journalism before earning her Master’s in Journalism from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, and began her career interning at The Times of India and Channel I'M — where she later became a news anchor, scripting and presenting her own stories. Between deadlines, she’s worked across digital media platforms, covering politics, gender, pop culture, cinema, and everything in between. She has interviewed actors, creators, and changemakers, and occasionally edits her own video content — thanks to being certified in Photoshop and InDesign. In 2025, she joined the Asian Media Group in her first “official” newsroom gig, where she now covers entertainment, lifestyle, and the layered realities of South Asian identity. She believes storytelling should feel personal — even when it’s public — and likes to write not to please, but to provoke, question, and occasionally stir the pot.
Jamie Lee Curtis says cosmetic surgery has caused the “disfigurement of generations of women”.
Describes the cosmeceutical industry as “a genocide” against natural human appearance.
Blames AI filters for worsening beauty standards and driving cosmetic procedures.
Opens up about her regrets over getting surgery at 25 and how she now embraces ageing.
Oscar-winner Jamie Lee Curtis has launched a sharp critique of the beauty industry, warning that cosmetic surgery and AI beauty filters have “wiped out” natural human appearance for entire generations of women. In a candid interview with The Guardian, the 66-year-old actress likened the cosmetic procedure boom to a form of “genocide”, a controversial term she insists is deliberate, given the scale and cultural impact of what she sees as industry-driven body modification.
Jamie Lee Curtis says tech-fuelled beauty lies are harming young women’s self-worthGetty Images
Why did Jamie Lee Curtis compare plastic surgery to 'genocide'?
Curtis, who stars in the upcoming Freakier Friday sequel, told The Guardian that the term “genocide” reflects what she views as a mass erasure of natural female beauty. She blames what she calls the “cosmeceutical industrial complex” for encouraging generations of women to pursue artificial enhancements, ranging from fillers to surgical alterations, at the cost of self-acceptance.
“I’ve used that word for a long time because it’s strong,” she said. “I believe we’ve wiped out one or two generations of natural human appearance.”
Although her word choice has raised eyebrows, Curtis stands by it, arguing that society’s obsession with youth and perfection has deformed, not enhanced, women’s lives and appearances.
Jamie Lee Curtis blasts beauty industry for teaching young women to hate themselvesGetty Images
How is AI making beauty standards worse?
Curtis also pointed fingers at AI tools, especially facial filters on social media, for making “fake” the new normal. “Better is fake,” she said, noting how even she finds it hard to ignore the allure of filters once they show a digitally ‘improved’ version of her face.
“The filter face is what people want now,” she added. “It’s impossible to see the before and after and not think, ‘Well, that looks better.’ But what’s better? The lie?”
Her comments highlight growing concern over how AI is shaping unrealistic standards, especially for young women, through apps and image-editing tools that promote an unattainable version of beauty.
Jamie Lee Curtis says young women are chasing a fake version of beauty built by AIGetty Images
What’s Curtis’ personal experience with cosmetic surgery?
Curtis revealed she had a procedure in her 20s after a cinematographer on set commented on her “baggy eyes.” She regretted it immediately and has since become an outspoken advocate against surgical tweaks.
“That’s just not what you want to do at 25,” she said in a previous interview. “And I’ve kind of regretted it ever since.”
Now embracing her natural ageing, grey hair, and wrinkles, Curtis said she’s spent the last 30 years gradually stepping back from the spotlight, unlike her parents, actors Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh, who she says were discarded by Hollywood as they aged.
Jamie Lee Curtis says filtered beauty is damaging how young girls see themselvesGetty Images
Why is Jamie Lee Curtis speaking out now?
Her outspoken stance comes at a time when Curtis is experiencing a powerful late-career resurgence. After winning an Oscar in 2023 for Everything Everywhere All at Once and delivering a critically acclaimed role in The Bear, she’s using her voice to challenge harmful industry standards from within.
“I’ve become a really public advocate to say to women: you’re gorgeous and perfect the way you are,” she said. While she insists she won’t judge others for choosing cosmetic surgery, she calls it a “never-ending cycle” once it begins.
Curtis also warns that young women, often under pressure to fit a filtered ideal, are being sold an illusion of perfection. “Once you start, you can’t stop. But it’s not my job to judge. It’s none of my business.”
• Vijay Sethupathi accused of sexual misconduct by an X user • Actor denies claims, calls them a ‘desperate attempt to gain attention’ • Confirms filing a complaint with the cybercrime department • Says timing suspicious as his film Thalaivan Thalaivii gains success
Tamil actor Vijay Sethupathi has publicly denied allegations of sexual abuse that surfaced on social media last week, dismissing them as baseless and attention-seeking. In a detailed interview, the Maharaja actor expressed disappointment over the impact on his family and confirmed that legal action has been initiated.
The allegations were made by a user on X, who claimed that the actor sexually exploited a woman known to her and referenced a broader culture of drug use and exploitation in the Tamil film industry. Although the original post was deleted shortly after it went viral, the claims generated significant buzz online, prompting the actor to break his silence.
Vijay Sethupathi remains composed as he responds to online accusationsNews24
What has Vijay Sethupathi said about the allegations?
In a statement to journalist Subhash K Jha for Deccan Chronicle, Sethupathi categorically rejected the claims, labelling them "filthy" and "laughable."
“Anyone who knows me even remotely will laugh at this. I know myself too. This kind of filthy accusation can’t upset me. My family and close friends are upset, but I tell them, ‘Let it slide. This woman is obviously doing it to be noticed. She has her few minutes of fame, let her enjoy it,’” he said.
The 47-year-old actor added that while he remains personally unfazed, his family has found the episode upsetting. He emphasised that such falsehoods should not be allowed to damage reputations without consequences.
Vijay Sethupathi files cybercrime complaint following deleted viral posttelugucinema.com
What legal action has the actor taken?
Sethupathi confirmed that his team has already approached the cybercrime division with a formal complaint.
“I’ve faced all kinds of whispering campaigns for the last seven years. It hasn’t affected me so far and it never will,” he said, adding that such campaigns were increasingly becoming a tool to malign public figures without proof or accountability.
He also criticised the unfiltered nature of social media, stating, “In today’s day and age, anyone can say anything about anybody. There are no filters. All you need is an account on social media, and you can write what you like without fear of repercussion.”
Ramya Mohan’s now-deleted post accusing Vijay Sethupathi of exploitation Reddit
What were the allegations made online?
The claims originated from a now-deleted post by a user named Ramya Mohan, who alleged that Sethupathi offered £1,900 (₹2 lakh) for “caravan favours” and £480 (₹50,000) for “drives.” She accused him of exploiting a young woman and acting saintly on social media.
Her post also alleged that Kollywood’s film industry has a “drug-sex nexus” and normalised exploitation under the guise of industry norms. She claimed a girl she knew had suffered due to such abuse and is now undergoing rehabilitation.
Although no concrete evidence was provided and the tweet was quickly removed, the post was shared widely, sparking online debate.
Ramya Mohan claims Kollywood is rife with drugs and transactional abuseX Screengrab
Is the controversy linked to Sethupathi’s ongoing projects?
Sethupathi suspects the timing of the accusations was deliberately planned to tarnish his reputation just as his latest film Thalaivan Thalaivii, co-starring Nithya Menen, is receiving a strong response.
“My new film is doing well. Probably, some jealous elements think that by tarnishing me, they can damage my film. It doesn’t work that way,” he stated.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Traditional broadcasters face challenges reaching younger audiences
One in five children aged 4 -15 now turn to YouTube first when using the TV
YouTube now ranks second overall in UK viewing, behind BBC and ahead of ITV
Viewers over 55 doubled their YouTube watch time in the past year
Traditional broadcasters face challenges reaching younger audiences
Ofcom urges fair terms for public broadcasters sharing content on YouTube
YouTube has become the most popular first stop for children watching television in the UK, according to Ofcom’s annual survey on viewing habits. One in five children aged between four and fifteen turned to the video platform first when switching on the TV last year, reflecting a significant shift in how audiences engage with content.
Netflix followed closely, while BBC One remained within the top five choices—matched by BBC iPlayer in popularity among younger viewers.
A generational shift to connected screens
The findings highlight YouTube’s growing presence not just among children but across age groups. Viewers aged 55 and above nearly doubled their YouTube watch time in 2024, spending an average of 11 minutes a day compared to six minutes the previous year. Notably, 42% of this content was viewed via TV screens.
Across all demographics, viewers spent an average of 39 minutes daily on YouTube, placing the platform second only to the BBC in total viewing time. ITV ranked third.
Traditional live TV viewing continues to decline among younger audiences. Viewers aged 16 to 24 watched just 17 minutes of live TV per day last year, and only 45% tuned into any broadcast TV in a typical week, down from 48% in 2023.
YouTube content increasingly mirrors traditional TV formats
YouTube has evolved to compete more directly with established broadcasters, with half of its top-trending videos now including formats such as long-form interviews and game shows.
This evolution is prompting public service broadcasters like the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 to rethink their digital strategies. While posting content on YouTube helps attract younger viewers, it also reduces traffic to their own platforms and shifts advertising revenue to the tech giant.
Ed Leighton, Ofcom’s interim group director for strategy and research, said: “Public service broadcasters are recognising this shift, moving to meet audiences in the online spaces where they increasingly spend their time. But we need to see even more ambition in this respect to ensure that public service media that audiences value survives long into the future.”
Balancing reach with revenue
Ofcom has urged broadcasters to increase their presence on YouTube, but only on fair commercial terms. Its chair, Michael Grade, has called for ministers to consider new laws ensuring greater visibility for public service content on platforms like YouTube.
Among UK broadcasters, Channel 4 has taken the lead, placing a significant amount of its content on YouTube. ITV has also secured a new partnership with the platform. Within the BBC, debate continues over how much content should be shared via YouTube. BBC News head Deborah Turness revealed that the corporation’s AI division will also focus on expanding its YouTube strategy, particularly to engage younger viewers.
Total viewing time remains stable as habits evolve
Despite changes in viewing platforms, the total time spent watching video content at home remained steady. UK viewers averaged four hours and 30 minutes daily in 2024—just one minute less than in 2023.
Traditional broadcasters still account for the majority of viewing time at 56%, but this figure is down sharply from 71% in 2018.
YouTube is also leading in audio consumption, used weekly by 47% of UK adults, followed by Spotify at 36%. The platform’s growing influence is also evident in the podcast space, where YouTube has become a dominant destination for listeners.
Keep ReadingShow less
MasterChef contestant Sarah Shafi edited out after challenging BBC’s decision to air series amid misconduct claims
Sarah Shafi removed from MasterChef after objecting to its broadcast over misconduct allegations
Gregg Wallace and John Torode dropped from show following separate investigations
Shafi said airing the show sends a damaging message about the treatment of women
BBC to air the series from 6 August despite the backlash
A MasterChef contestant has been edited out of the upcoming season after she urged the BBC not to air the show, citing serious concerns about misconduct allegations involving former hosts Gregg Wallace and John Torode.
Sarah Shafi, a 57-year-old management development partner from Leeds, entered MasterChef in memory of her late mother, a pioneering Indian cookery teacher. But when multiple allegations against the two high-profile presenters surfaced, she asked producers to pull the entire series, not just her appearance.
BBC faces backlash for airing MasterChef despite contestant objectionsGetty Images
What led to Sarah Shafi’s removal from MasterChef 2025?
Sarah Shafi initially participated in the 2025 MasterChef amateur series, filmed last year. But after an independent report substantiated 45 allegations against Gregg Wallace, including inappropriate sexual language and one incident of unwelcome physical contact, and John Torode faced a substantiated claim of racist language, Shafi became one of the few voices demanding the series not be aired.
Shafi, who entered the cooking competition as a tribute to her late mother’s culinary legacy, said she was deeply disturbed by the BBC’s decision to proceed. “I didn’t say ‘edit me out’. I said: ‘Axe the show, don’t air the show.’”
She criticised what she called an "enabling environment" that failed to hold powerful men accountable. After a reportedly heated discussion with producers, she reluctantly agreed to be edited out, but only after the BBC confirmed it would air the show regardless of objections.
Sarah Shafi pictured in a still shared by the GuardianThe Guardian
What are the allegations against Gregg Wallace and John Torode?
Gregg Wallace, a longtime face of the franchise, was dropped by the BBC following the independent report’s findings. While Wallace issued an apology “for any distress caused,” he claimed he was cleared of the most “serious and sensational” accusations. He also publicly disclosed an autism diagnosis, which he said was often discussed but never acknowledged during his time on the show.
John Torode was removed shortly after, following the confirmation of a complaint related to the use of racist language. He maintains that the incident “never happened.”
Both men are absent from the upcoming season, but their past involvement in the already-filmed series remained a point of concern for Shafi and others.
Former presenters Gregg Wallace and John Torode dropped after misconduct findingsGetty Images
Why did the BBC choose to broadcast the series anyway?
In a public statement, the BBC defended its decision, saying it consulted with all the contestants and found “widespread support” to go ahead with the series. “We understand not everyone will agree, but airing the show does not diminish the seriousness of the findings,” the statement read.
Shafi, however, questioned the moral cost of prioritising entertainment over accountability. “They talk about life-changing opportunities for the top 10 contestants. What about how life-changing, for the worse, it’s been for the victims?” she said.
She even proposed a solution: a spin-off episode celebrating contestants’ talent without involving the disgraced presenters, an idea she says producers dismissed.
Banijay UK, the production company behind MasterChef, acknowledged Shafi’s opposition but reiterated that the majority of participants supported airing the series. “We are sorry that Sarah does not support the decision… her concerns were taken seriously and discussed with the BBC,” a spokesperson said.
Despite the backlash, the 2025 series of MasterChef is set to premiere on 6 August, with both former presenters now removed from future involvement.
Keep ReadingShow less
Supriya Menon Prithviraj publicly names cyberstalker after 7 years of online harassment
Supriya Menon has identified the woman allegedly harassing her online since 2018.
The Malayalam producer named a US-based nurse in an Instagram Story.
She revealed the woman had also targeted her late father in recent attacks.
Supriya said years of silence ended after the abuse escalated beyond tolerance.
Journalist-turned-film producer Supriya Menon, wife of Malayalam actor Prithviraj Sukumaran, has broken her silence on enduring seven years of online abuse. In a powerful Instagram post on Tuesday, she publicly identified the woman she claims has been behind relentless trolling since 2018, a Malayali nurse based in Chattanooga, USA, named Christina Eldo, also known as Christina Babu Kurien.
Supriya shared a filtered photo of the woman on her Instagram Story, writing, “Meet Christinaeldo. She has been passing nasty comments on most accounts which post something about me. She would constantly make fake accounts and post, and I continued to block her.”
She added that though she had uncovered the woman’s identity years ago, she initially refrained from exposing her, citing compassion for the woman’s young son. However, after discovering that the online attacks had extended to her late father, Supriya decided enough was enough.
The tipping point came when the woman allegedly made derogatory comments about Supriya’s deceased father. “Even that filter she has on is not enough to hide the ugliness she holds inside and spews at me since 2018,” Supriya wrote.
In 2023, Supriya had hinted at the ongoing abuse in a now-resurfaced Instagram Story, where she asked followers whether she should take legal action against a cyberbully who had been harassing her for years using fake profiles. However, it is only now, after another personal attack, that she chose to reveal the person’s identity.
Supriya has not yet confirmed whether she plans to pursue legal recourse, but her public stand has already sparked widespread discussion on the long-term emotional toll of cyber harassment, particularly for public figures.
Screenshot of the Instagram story where Supriya identified the alleged cyberbullyInstagram/supriyamenonprithviraj
Who is Christina Eldo, the alleged cyberstalker?
According to a report in The Times of India, Christina Eldo is a nurse currently residing in the United States. Her private Instagram profile has only 10 posts and around 77 followers. A promotion consultant from ETimes confirmed that she is originally from Kerala and now lives in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Despite operating under multiple fake accounts over the years, the woman was reportedly tracked down by Supriya using her consistent pattern of online trolling. Supriya stated that Christina had made it a habit to comment maliciously on every post or public mention involving her.
Supriya’s story has also reignited conversations about the challenges faced by women who are often overshadowed by their celebrity spouses. Speaking to Film Companion South earlier, Supriya had said, “People should see me as a separate individual. I am preparing to create my own name.”
A former journalist who worked with a major Indian media house, Supriya transitioned into film production after marrying Prithviraj in 2011. She now leads Prithviraj Productions and has co-produced hits like L2: Empuraan. Despite her own professional accomplishments, she continues to be primarily identified as “Prithviraj’s wife”—a label she has openly challenged.
A candid moment of Supriya Menon addressing a panel at the Kerala Literature FestivalInstagram/supriyamenonprithviraj
Will this trigger change in online abuse reporting?
While Supriya hasn’t filed an official complaint yet, her decision to call out her harasser publicly may encourage other women to speak up about digital abuse. In a world where trolling is often dismissed as trivial or “part of the internet,” her post sends a strong message: being silent is no longer an option.
Keep ReadingShow less
6 years after Dear Comrade, Vijay Deverakonda brings back the fire in Kingdom
Vijay Deverakonda says Kingdom was not made to chase pan-India success
Spy thriller set against 1990s Sri Lankan conflict, directed by Gowtam Tinnanuri
Actor plays a complex cop in a politically charged setting
Kingdom releases in cinemas on 31 July 2025
With just days left for Kingdom to hit screens on 31 July, Vijay Deverakonda is stepping into release week with cautious optimism. After a string of disappointing films like Liger, Kushi, and The Family Star, Deverakonda insists Kingdom wasn’t chosen to chase trends or market expectations, but for its story.
“Had I done it for market appeal, you’d see hundreds of soldiers and weapons in the teaser. But we kept it raw and real,” the actor told THR India. Helmed by Jersey director Gowtam Tinnanuri, the political spy thriller might just be Deverakonda’s most crucial project since Arjun Reddy.
Vijay Deverakonda prepares for a powerful transformation in Kingdom Instagram/sitharaentertainments
What is Kingdom about and who stars in it?
Kingdom is set during a volatile period in 1990s Sri Lanka and revolves around a police constable who is sent undercover on a high-stakes mission. As the story unfolds, he discovers the syndicate he’s assigned to infiltrate is led by his estranged brother. The role, which sees Deverakonda don three distinct looks, is layered and emotionally charged, a far cry from the flashy, larger-than-life roles he’s done recently.
The film also stars Satyadev as the antagonist and introduces Bhagyashri Borse. The project is backed by producers Naga Vamsi and Sai Soujanya. Music is composed by Anirudh Ravichander, a collaboration that Deverakonda says he’s long dreamed of. “Anirudh’s music adds depth. It’s not just background score, it’s narrative,” he shared.
Is Kingdom a response to Deverakonda's past failures?
Post-Liger, which was aggressively marketed but panned for weak storytelling, Deverakonda seemed to retreat from the spotlight. Industry insiders say Kingdom marks a clear pivot, both in tone and intent.
“He’s no longer chasing stardom. He’s chasing substance,” a senior trade source noted. The film doesn’t rely on extravagant scale but instead focuses on authentic storytelling. “There’s drama, action, emotion, but all of it rooted in realism,” Deverakonda said.
Even in the teaser, the choice to show a single checkpoint manned by 40 soldiers rather than a cinematic battlefield shows how the film leans to accuracy over exaggeration. “We wanted to reflect what that era and region really looked like, not stage something for box office optics,” he explained.
Industry analysts consider Kingdom a turning point. Deverakonda’s once sky-high popularity post-Geetha Govindam has taken a hit. Kingdom is being seen as a “make or break” moment.
“Vijay still has star power and youth appeal. But audience patience is thin. He needs a hit, and soon,” says trade expert Ramesh Bala. If Kingdom succeeds, it could reset his career and put him back on the national map.
But the stakes aren’t just professional. “It’s also deeply personal,” Deverakonda admitted. “This film has taken everything from me both physically and emotionally. And the love I’m already getting from fans makes it all worth it.”
Vijay Deverakonda says Kingdom was made with heart not hype as career pressure buildsInstagram/sitharaentertainments
Final thoughts from Deverakonda on Kingdom
Reflecting on the journey, the actor said he felt a mix of nervousness and gratitude. “This film challenged me. From extreme weather to intense emotional scenes, it demanded a lot,” he said, thanking director Tinnanuri and the cast and crew for their commitment. “Without the team’s support, we couldn’t have wrapped in 120 working days.”
He added, “I’ve always believed in giving 100 percent. Kingdom isn’t about hype, it’s about heart.”
As Kingdom readies for release, all eyes are on Deverakonda. Not just to see if he can deliver a hit, but if he can finally turn the page on a challenging chapter.