Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

‘It is time to take a stand against online hate’

By Sanjay Bhandari

Chair, Kick It Out

SOCIAL MEDIA is just like the real world but on steroids.


Every action and emotion is compressed and exaggerated. It can be a place of immense joy, a crucial source of real-time news and a springboard for vital political change.

The Arab Spring, Clap for Carers, Black Lives Matter – all these are social movements that have been positive­ly accelerated by social media, while Sarah Cooper’s Trump imper­sonations, Michael Spicer’s Room Next Door and Andrew Cot­ter’s adventures with his labradors Olive and Mabel have kept us connected and enter­tained during the forced isolation of lockdown.

Of course, when so­cial media companies developed their prod­ucts, this would have been the kind of peace­ful idyll they envisaged.

But sadly, like hu­manity, social media has a dark side. Bully­ing, racism and hate is rife. Trolls have weap­onised social media and football, our na­tional religion, has be­come a battleground.

Football and social media can be a positive combined force: think of Marcus Rashford campaigning for free school meals. But social media is also a magnet for hate. Its relative an­onymity combined with fragmented law en­forcement creates a shelter for trolls and en­courages “pile-ons” where one abusive troll encourages others into a frothing spiral of hate.

Arsenal legend Ian Wright, Crystal Palace winger Wilfried Zaha and Sheffield United striker David McGol­drick have all been re­cent high-profile victims. In the cases of Wright and Zaha, the perpetra­tors were children.

In order to tackle on­line hate, everyone needs to do more.

First, we need better regulation and enforce­ment. Technology is massively under-regu­lated (compared to oth­er industries that im­pact our daily lives like banking, medicine, en­ergy, food). Recently, I met with the home sec­retary and was very en­couraged by her desire to drive real change. The online harms bill is potentially a game-changer. It would create a duty of care on social media companies and a regulator with power. If the bill is passed, the UK would be world leaders in social media regulation. We encour­age its adoption. But we will also need better connected law enforce­ment and prosecution processes as trolls are falling through the cracks. They need to be identified and punished.

Second, we need so­cial media companies to be part of the solu­tion. We cannot just de­monise them – this is a technology problem so we will need technology solutions. We need poli­cies that remove hate speech quickly. We need more content moderators to review complaints. We need more investment in ar­tificial intelligence to automate the suppres­sion of unlawful content. We need greater speed and transparency over the entire complaints process. We need loop­holes to be closed (such as the ability on Insta­gram to direct message any user). We need rapid provision of user infor­mation to law enforce­ment when investigating incidents (though we need to preserve the right to create anony­mous accounts as that may serve legitimate purposes – for example, if you are gay in a coun­try where homosexuali­ty is illegal, an anony­mous social media ac­count may be a vital link to support).

We need social me­dia companies to team up with us to create bet­ter understanding of the different kinds of troll­ing behaviour so we can create more targeted re­sponse strategies – how much of the hate is one-off? How much is com­mitted by children? How much is organised? If so, who are the members of those networks? What are their motivations?

Social media firms should also utilise their depth of resources to actively aid the wider battle against discrimi­nation by using their platforms to educate the public and to accel­erate the reporting of abuse. We have an on­going dialogue with so­cial media companies and they are already doing some of this work, but they need to do more. Increased reg­ulation would doubtless accelerate this work.

Finally, we all need to play our part as individ­uals and ‘Take A Stand’ against racism, discrim­ination and hate. We need a cultural reset. All of us fans and partici­pants need to exhibit zero tolerance. We need to become activists not bystanders. Our mantra should be ‘See It, Hear It, Report It’. Players should continue to play their part by using their platforms to keep the issue in the public eye. Governing bodies, clubs and charities like ours will continue to play our part by lobbying government and social media companies for meaningful change. We should also conduct our own independent social media monitoring and investigations to hold people accountable and create evidence trails to support prosecutions (as the Premier League has done for Neil Mau­pay of Brighton). Clubs and commercial spon­sors can exert further pressure by looking at how to stop funding hate on social media plat­forms by strategically withdrawing advertising.

Online hate is a com­plex cultural and social problem. There is no magic wand to wave away the problem. As on the football pitch, success will come from creativi­ty, hard work and, above all, teamwork.

More For You

Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
(From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

Sunder Katwala

“SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

Keep ReadingShow less