Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Is big also beautiful?

by Amit Roy

MANY people in India seem to be ungrateful to prime minister Narendra Modi who, just


months before a general election, has gifted a 597-ft (182 metres) tall statue, costing £330 million, of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, home minister in 1947, to the nation.

I once went to the Greek island of Rhodes to do a story on the Colossus of Rhodes, a 106ft

statue built in 280 BC, but which crumbled in an earthquake in 226 BC. Some enterprising

tourism promoters claimed a large boulder recovered from the sea was a remnant from the

original statue.

But Prof John Barron, the affable English classical scholar with whom I had travelled, took

barely five minutes to pronounce what had been found as a fake.

Will Patel’s ‘Statue of Unity’ win Modi any votes? For the time being, big is not necessarily beautiful.

Maybe with time, public acceptance of what is now widely seen as a blot on the Gujarat

landscape will grow.

Ramachandra Guha, the historian and Gandhi’s biographer, tweeted: “Sardar Patel would

have been appalled by the crude boastfulness of the ads in his name in today’s newspapers – that his statue is taller than any in China, America, Japan. That is certainly not how Sardar would have measured national dignity and self-respect.”

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Anti immigration protesters attend the 'Glasgow Reclaims The Streets From Far-right Hatred And Violence' anti-racism protest on June 13, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland.

Getty Images

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Sunder Katwala

Born in the mid-1970s I felt part of a lucky generation, which gained from pushing back the overt racism of that era. When we talk about stronger “social norms”, what we mean is that few people thought that monkey chants at the football or racist jokes on the telly were normal anymore – while more had Asian and black colleagues, neighbours and friends.

That past progress is put to the test today. A terrible crime in Belfast saw organised efforts at indiscriminate racist attacks on migrants and ethnic minorities, whose only connection to the crime was the colour of their skin. Those seeking to make racism fashionable again have the online megaphone of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, on their side.

Past progress could be experienced unevenly, too. Being of mixed Indian and Irish Catholic parentage, I saw both identities rise in status once the BBC comedy Goodness Gracious Me inverted who could tell the jokes, and peace broke out in Northern Ireland. Yet, British Muslims of my generation felt under more intense scrutiny after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Efforts to tackle anti-Muslim hatred risked being stalled by arguments over what to call it and how to define it. The government’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility seeks to transcend the confusion that the term “Islamophobia” could generate. But the challenge is not just to define the prejudice – but to find effective ways to shrink it.

There are sobering findings on the starting points in new research from British Future and the British Muslim Trust. More than half of British Muslims report experiencing prejudice based on their religion last year – a quarter in person and over a third online. A third of the public hold mostly negative views. One in six endorse sweeping and often indiscriminate hostility. Anti-Muslim hostility can have about twice the social reach as prejudice against other faith or ethnic minorities.

Tackling this hostility cannot be the responsibility of Muslims alone. It will take a whole-of-society effort. After all, this is foundationally about the attitudes towards a six per cent minority group, held among the 94 per cent of us who are not Muslim.

Keep ReadingShow less