REGARDED as a wily cricket captain during his playing days, Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan appeared on Sunday (3) to have stumped his political opposition as well.
The country's president dissolved the national assembly just hours after the deputy speaker declined to accept a no-confidence motion that would likely have seen Khan booted from office, meaning the country will go to the polls within 90 days.
Whether he gets a second innings remains to be seen.
Khan enjoyed genuine popular support when he became premier in 2018, but critics say he has failed to deliver on promises to revitalise the economy and improve the plight of the poor.
The 69-year-old's Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party was voted in by millions who grew up watching him play cricket, where he excelled as an all-rounder and led the nation to World Cup victory in 1992.
The PTI overturned decades of dominance by the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) - two usually feuding groups that have now joined forces to oust him.
Khan's vision was for Pakistan to become a welfare state modelled on the Islamic golden age of the seventh to 14th centuries, a period of cultural, economic and scientific flourishing in the Muslim world.
But he has made little headway in improving Pakistan's financial situation, with galloping inflation, crippling debt and a feeble rupee undermining economic reform.
A deteriorating security situation, particularly since the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan last year, has also happened on his watch.
Tiptoed into politics
The Oxford-educated son of a wealthy Lahore family, Khan had a reputation as a playboy until his retirement from international cricket.
For years he busied himself with charity projects, raising millions to build a cancer hospital to honour his mother.
He tiptoed into politics and for years held the PTI's only parliamentary seat.
But the party grew hugely during the military-led government of General Pervez Musharraf, becoming a genuine force in the 2013 elections before winning bigger five years later.
Running the country proved more difficult than sitting in opposition, however.
Double-digit inflation has driven up the cost of basic goods, and while the economy is forecast to grow four per cent this year, it has been stagnant for the last three.
Pakistan has also had to borrow heavily just to service nearly $130 billion (£99.13 bn) of foreign debt.
The increasingly volatile security situation exemplified by the Taliban's return to power across the border in mid-August has also contributed to Khan's downfall.
The hardline Islamists' victory was initially seen as a victory, both for Pakistan - long accused of supporting them - as well as for a prime minister dubbed "Taliban Khan" for his consistent advocacy of dialogue and criticism of US policy towards Kabul.
But attacks by Pakistan's own Taliban - as well as the local Daesh group and Baluch separatists - have increased despite Kabul's assurances that Afghan soil would not be used for such purposes.
Pakistan's army is key to political power, and some analysts say Khan lost its crucial support - claims both sides deny. Certainly, he could not have pulled off Sunday's manoeuvre without the military's knowledge, or support.
Closer to China, Russia
Khan's efforts to position Pakistan as a key non-aligned regional player have not been successful either.
Ties with the United States have frayed, with Khan accusing Washington of working with the opposition for regime change.
Islamabad has moved closer to China, even though the important work on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has slowed down.
He has also moved closer to Russia, angering the West by continuing a visit to Moscow on the same day as the invasion of Ukraine.
Khan did have some domestic successes.
He is credited with bringing Pakistan relatively unscathed through the global Covid-19 pandemic, and a free universal health scheme he pioneered is slowly being rolled out across the country.
Khan frequently rails against Western permissiveness, sparking outrage among rights groups by repeatedly linking rape to the way women dress in a country where sexual violence is widespread.
Married three times, his current wife Bushra Bibi comes from a conservative family and wears a veil in public.
Often described as being impulsive and brash, he draws frequently on cricket analogies to describe his political battles.
"I fight till the very last ball. I never quit whatever the result may be," he said in an address to the nation last week.
(AFP)
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
More For You
Harry and Meghan urge tougher safeguards to protect children online
Apr 24, 2025
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have called for stronger protections for children online, warning that not enough is being done to shield young people from the dangers of social media
During a visit to New York, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle unveiled a new memorial dedicated to the memory of children whose families believe harmful online content contributed to their deaths. The installation, named the Lost Screen Memorial, features 50 smartphones, each displaying an image of a child lost to what their families describe as the adverse effects of social media. The memorial was made available to the public for 24 hours.
The images featured in the memorial were provided by members of the Parents’ Network, a support group established by the couple’s Archewell Foundation. The network connects parents whose children have suffered harm related to online activity, offering solidarity and advocating for systemic changes in tech policy.
Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Prince Harry said: “We want to make sure that things are changed so that no more kids are lost to social media.” He added that he is “grateful” that his and Meghan’s two young children are not yet exposed to the online world, stating, “Life is better off social media.”
At the Archewell Foundation event in New York, the prince spoke about the complex social dynamics that make avoiding social media difficult for many young people. “The easiest thing to say is to keep your kids away from social media. The sad reality is the kids who aren't on social media normally get bullied at school because they can't be part of the same conversation as everybody else,” he told journalists.
Both Harry and Meghan have expressed strong support for families seeking greater transparency from tech companies. They argue that bereaved parents should be granted access to the online activity of their children following their deaths. Prince Harry criticised tech companies for citing privacy laws to deny access, particularly to families in the UK.
“You are telling a parent, you are telling a dad and a mum that they can't have the details of what their kid was up to on social media because of the privacy of their kid. It's wrong,” said the prince, calling for accountability from the platforms involved.
Meghan described online harm as a “global issue”, asserting that “one thing we can all agree on is that children should be safe.” She commended the families who are speaking publicly about their loss in order to drive change. “I think in many ways what we see through these parents is the hope and the promise of something better,” she said. “They just want to make sure this doesn't happen to anyone else.”
The couple’s foundation has been actively involved in promoting online safety and mental health initiatives, and continues to advocate for reforms that prioritise the well-being of young people in the digital age.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
Current Issue
Afghan exodus soars as Pakistan deadline nears
Apr 24, 2025
MORE than 100,000 Afghans have left Pakistan in the past three weeks, the interior ministry said on Tuesday (22), after Islamabad announced the cancellation of residence permits.
Calling Afghans “terrorists and criminals”, the Pakistan government launched its mass eviction campaign on April 1. Analysts said the expulsions are designed to pressure Afghanistan’s Taliban authorities, which Islamabad blames for fuelling a rise in border attacks.
The interior ministry said “100,529 Afghans have left in April”.
Convoys of Afghan families have headed to the border since the start of April, when the deadline to leave expired, crossing into a country mired in a humanitarian crisis.
“I was born in Pakistan and have never been to Afghanistan,” 27-yearold Allah Rahman said at the Torkham border last Saturday (19).
“I was afraid the police might humiliate me and my family. Now we’re heading back to Afghanistan out of sheer helplessness.”
Afghanistan’s prime minister Hasan Akhund last Saturday (19) condemned the “unilateral measures” after Pakistan’s foreign minister Ishaq Dar flew to Kabul for a day-long visit to discuss the returns.
Akhund urged the Pakistani government to “facilitate the dignified return of Afghan refugees”.
Afghans in Pakistan have reported weeks of arbitrary arrests, extortion and harassment by authorities, with many of those forcibly returned living in Sindh and Punjab provinces.
Many people left voluntarily, choosing to depart rather than face deportation, but the UN refugee agency UNHCR said more arrests and detentions took place in Pakistan in April alone – 12,948 – than in all of last year.
Pakistan’s security forces are under pressure along the border with Afghanistan as they battle a growing insurgency by ethnic nationalists in Balochistan in the southwest, and the Pakistani Taliban and its affiliates in the northwest. Last year was the deadliest in Pakistan in a decade.
The government frequently accuses Afghan nationals of taking part in attacks and blames Kabul for allowing militants to take refuge on its soil, a charge Taliban leaders deny.
Millions of Afghans have poured into Pakistan over the past decades fleeing successive wars, as well as hundreds of thousands since the return of the Taliban government in 2021.
Some Pakistanis have grown weary of hosting a large Afghan population as security and economic woes deepen, and the deportation campaign has widespread support.
“They came here for refuge, but ended up taking jobs, opening businesses. They took jobs from Pakistanis who are already struggling,” 41-yearold hairdresser Tanveer Ahmad said.
More than half of Afghans being deported were children, the UNHCR said last Friday (18). The women and girls among those crossing entered a country where they are banned from education beyond secondary school and barred from many sectors of work.
In the first phase of returns in 2023, hundreds of thousands of undocumented Afghans were forced across the border in the space of a few weeks.
In the second phase, announced in March, Pakistan cancelled the residence permits of more than 800,000 Afghans and warned thousands more awaiting relocation to other countries to leave by the end of April.
The April 30 deadline is final, Talal Chaudhry, an interior ministry adviser told a press conference in Islamabad, underlining that only those Afghans who hold valid visas to be in Pakistan would be allowed to stay.
The repatriation drive is part of a campaign called the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan launched in late 2023.
Keep ReadingShow less
Energy secretary Ed Miliband reads a letter from Britain's King Charles III during the Future of Energy Security Summit at Lancaster House on April 24, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Justin Tallis - WPA Pool/Getty Images)
Government announces funding for offshore wind supply chains
Apr 24, 2025
THE government has announced an initial £300 million investment to strengthen domestic offshore wind supply chains ahead of the Comprehensive Spending Review. The funding will be distributed through Great British Energy, the country's publicly-owned clean energy company.
Prime minister Keir Starmer on Thursday (24) said the investment aims to support jobs and help the UK reach clean power by 2030.
"Delivering the Plan for Change means winning the race for the clean energy jobs of the future, which will drive growth and help us reach clean power by 2030," said Starmer. "I am bringing forward much-needed investment in our domestic offshore wind supply chains, strengthening our security and creating good jobs for our welders, electricians, and engineers."
The government expects this investment to attract billions in additional private investment, supporting thousands of jobs in the UK's industrial regions. The money will fund manufacturing components for offshore wind projects, including floating platforms and cables.
Energy secretary Ed Miliband said: "It is only by taking back control of our energy that we can protect families and businesses from the rollercoaster of global markets we don't control."
The announcement comes as the UK hosts a two-day Summit on the Future of Energy Security in London, bringing together government and industry representatives from around the world, including EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen.
Dan McGrail, interim CEO of Great British Energy, said the company "will help the UK win the global race for clean energy jobs and growth by investing in homegrown supply chains and ensuring key infrastructure parts are made here in Britain."
Jane Cooper, Deputy CEO of RenewableUK, welcomed the funding, saying there is "a huge opportunity for the UK to secure thousands of new jobs and supply chain investment in the sector."
She added that with appropriate support, there is "an opportunity to triple our manufacturing capacity over the next decade, adding £25 billion to the UK economy and creating an additional 10,000 jobs in the supply chain."
The investment is part of the £8.3bn allocated to Great British Energy over the current parliament. Companies will be able to apply for grants if they can demonstrate long-term investments in UK supply chains, a statement said.
Keep ReadingShow less
'I say to the whole world: India will identify, track and punish every terrorist and their backer,' Modi said in his first speech since the incident.
Getty Images
Modi vows to hunt Kashmir attackers ‘to the ends of the Earth’
Apr 24, 2025
INDIA and Pakistan have exchanged a series of diplomatic measures after prime minister Narendra Modi blamed Pakistan for a deadly shooting in Pahalgam, Kashmir, in which 26 civilians were killed.
Modi said India would identify and punish those behind the attack and accused Pakistan of supporting cross-border terrorism.
"I say to the whole world: India will identify, track and punish every terrorist and their backer," Modi said in his first speech since the incident. "We will pursue them to the ends of the Earth."
Indian police have identified two of the three suspected gunmen as Pakistani nationals.
The attack in Pahalgam, a tourist area in the Muslim-majority Kashmir region, was the deadliest against civilians in 25 years. Previous attacks had mostly targeted Indian security forces.
Following the attack, New Delhi suspended a water-sharing treaty, shut down the main land border crossing with Pakistan, downgraded diplomatic ties, and withdrew visas for Pakistani citizens.
In response, Pakistan prime minister Shehbaz Sharif convened a meeting of the National Security Committee on Thursday in Islamabad, attended by top military officials including Army Chief Asim Munir.
"Any threat to Pakistan's sovereignty and to the security of its people will be met with firm reciprocal measures in all domains," said a statement from Sharif’s office.
The statement added: "In the absence of any credible investigation and verifiable evidence, attempts to link the Pahalgam attack with Pakistan are frivolous, devoid of rationality and defeat logic."
Tit-for-tat measures
Pakistan responded by expelling Indian diplomats, cancelling visas for Indian nationals except Sikh pilgrims, and ordering Indian military advisers to leave the country.
Islamabad also said the Wagah border crossing in Punjab would be shut from both sides. It warned that any Indian move to stop water supply from the Indus River would be considered an "act of war".
Indian police said the three gunmen belong to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a Pakistan-based group listed by the United Nations as a terrorist organisation.
Police have announced a reward of two million rupees (around $23,500) for information leading to each gunman’s arrest.
While most of the actions by both sides are symbolic, there are concerns in India and Pakistan that the tensions could escalate further. In 2019, a suicide bombing in Kashmir that killed 41 Indian troops led to Indian airstrikes in Pakistan.
At the Wagah-Attari border, some Pakistani nationals had already begun leaving.
"We just want to go home," said Mehnaz Begum, a businessman from Karachi.
Modi: ‘Will break their backbone’
Modi led two minutes of silence in memory of the victims. All but one of those killed were Indian nationals.
"I say this unequivocally: whoever has carried out this attack, and the ones who devised it, will be made to pay beyond their imagination," he said during a visit to Bihar.
"Whatever little land these terrorists have, it's time to reduce it to dust. The willpower of 1.4 billion Indians will break the backbone of these terrorists."
Kashmir has been divided between India and Pakistan since 1947. Both countries claim the territory in full but control different parts.
An insurgency has continued in Indian-administered Kashmir since 1989, with rebel groups calling for either independence or a merger with Pakistan.
Indian forces have launched a search operation in the region, and several people have been detained. The army said a soldier was killed on Thursday during a clash with gunmen in Basantgarh, Kashmir.
Shock and fear in Kashmir
Srinagar, the capital of Indian-administered Kashmir, remained calm on Thursday, but residents expressed concern about the impact of the attack.
"Everyone I have spoken to is heartbroken and shocked," said Siddhi Wahid, a Kashmiri historian and political commentator.
The attack occurred on Tuesday as tourists visited Pahalgam. According to survivors interviewed by Indian media, the gunmen emerged from nearby forests and fired into crowds.
Some said those who recited the Islamic declaration of faith were spared.
In Pakistan, activists and religious groups held anti-India protests.
The attack has led to increased tension for Kashmiri students in India, who say they are facing harassment.
"It is a deliberate and targeted campaign of hate and vilification against students from a particular region and identity," said Nasir Khuehami, convenor of the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Trump also announced an initiative on historically black colleges and universities and signed orders on AI education and workforce development.
Getty Images
Trump signs orders targeting university diversity policies and accreditation
Apr 24, 2025
DONALD TRUMP signed a set of executive orders on Wednesday aimed at US universities, focusing on foreign donations, college accreditation, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.
One order directs the federal government to enforce existing laws requiring universities to disclose large foreign gifts. Another addresses accreditation, which Trump has described as a “secret weapon.”
Reading the orders aloud, White House staff secretary Will Scharf said accrediting bodies have promoted “woke ideology” over merit.
Education secretary Linda McMahon said, “We should be looking at those who have real merit to get in, and we have to look harder at those universities that aren’t enforcing that.”
The administration has taken actions since 2017 to reshape higher education, including threats to funding, bans on diversity programmes, and detaining international students.
More than 150 university presidents signed a statement this week criticising what they called “unprecedented government overreach.”
Harvard University, named by Scharf, has sued the government over potential funding cuts, The Guardian reported.
A White House statement said the new orders allow federal action against accreditors for poor performance or civil rights violations.
Trump also announced an initiative on historically black colleges and universities and signed orders on AI education and workforce development.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
© Copyright 2025 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Asian Media Group USA Inc