REGARDED as a wily cricket captain during his playing days, Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan appeared on Sunday (3) to have stumped his political opposition as well.
The country's president dissolved the national assembly just hours after the deputy speaker declined to accept a no-confidence motion that would likely have seen Khan booted from office, meaning the country will go to the polls within 90 days.
Whether he gets a second innings remains to be seen.
Khan enjoyed genuine popular support when he became premier in 2018, but critics say he has failed to deliver on promises to revitalise the economy and improve the plight of the poor.
The 69-year-old's Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party was voted in by millions who grew up watching him play cricket, where he excelled as an all-rounder and led the nation to World Cup victory in 1992.
The PTI overturned decades of dominance by the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) - two usually feuding groups that have now joined forces to oust him.
Khan's vision was for Pakistan to become a welfare state modelled on the Islamic golden age of the seventh to 14th centuries, a period of cultural, economic and scientific flourishing in the Muslim world.
But he has made little headway in improving Pakistan's financial situation, with galloping inflation, crippling debt and a feeble rupee undermining economic reform.
A deteriorating security situation, particularly since the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan last year, has also happened on his watch.
Tiptoed into politics
The Oxford-educated son of a wealthy Lahore family, Khan had a reputation as a playboy until his retirement from international cricket.
For years he busied himself with charity projects, raising millions to build a cancer hospital to honour his mother.
He tiptoed into politics and for years held the PTI's only parliamentary seat.
But the party grew hugely during the military-led government of General Pervez Musharraf, becoming a genuine force in the 2013 elections before winning bigger five years later.
Running the country proved more difficult than sitting in opposition, however.
Double-digit inflation has driven up the cost of basic goods, and while the economy is forecast to grow four per cent this year, it has been stagnant for the last three.
Pakistan has also had to borrow heavily just to service nearly $130 billion (£99.13 bn) of foreign debt.
The increasingly volatile security situation exemplified by the Taliban's return to power across the border in mid-August has also contributed to Khan's downfall.
The hardline Islamists' victory was initially seen as a victory, both for Pakistan - long accused of supporting them - as well as for a prime minister dubbed "Taliban Khan" for his consistent advocacy of dialogue and criticism of US policy towards Kabul.
But attacks by Pakistan's own Taliban - as well as the local Daesh group and Baluch separatists - have increased despite Kabul's assurances that Afghan soil would not be used for such purposes.
Pakistan's army is key to political power, and some analysts say Khan lost its crucial support - claims both sides deny. Certainly, he could not have pulled off Sunday's manoeuvre without the military's knowledge, or support.
Closer to China, Russia
Khan's efforts to position Pakistan as a key non-aligned regional player have not been successful either.
Ties with the United States have frayed, with Khan accusing Washington of working with the opposition for regime change.
Islamabad has moved closer to China, even though the important work on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has slowed down.
He has also moved closer to Russia, angering the West by continuing a visit to Moscow on the same day as the invasion of Ukraine.
Khan did have some domestic successes.
He is credited with bringing Pakistan relatively unscathed through the global Covid-19 pandemic, and a free universal health scheme he pioneered is slowly being rolled out across the country.
Khan frequently rails against Western permissiveness, sparking outrage among rights groups by repeatedly linking rape to the way women dress in a country where sexual violence is widespread.
Married three times, his current wife Bushra Bibi comes from a conservative family and wears a veil in public.
Often described as being impulsive and brash, he draws frequently on cricket analogies to describe his political battles.
"I fight till the very last ball. I never quit whatever the result may be," he said in an address to the nation last week.
(AFP)
Site Navigation
Search 
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch delivers her speech on the final day of the Conservative Party conference at Manchester Central Convention Complex on October 08, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
        Getty Images
    
Badenoch rules out deporting legally settled migrants
Oct 30, 2025
TORY leader Kemi Badenoch has clarified that her party has no intention of deporting people who are legally settled in the UK, following a wave of confusion sparked by comments from fellow MP Katie Lam.
Speaking to reporters in London after a policy speech, Badenoch said Lam had spoken “imprecisely” when she suggested that many legally settled families could be sent home under a future Tory government, reported the Guardian.
Earlier this month, Lam – who serves as a shadow Home Office minister – claimed that the party planned to revoke indefinite leave to remain (ILR) status and that people would “go home” to ensure the UK was “culturally coherent”.
Her comments triggered outrage within her own party, with several Tory MPs lodging complaints with the whips’ office.
The remarks also renewed scrutiny of a draft bill proposed in May, which suggested that individuals could lose ILR if they or their dependants claimed benefits or earned less than £38,700 a year.
Initially, a spokesperson for Badenoch said Lam’s comments were “broadly in line” with party policy. However, the Conservatives later said that their position on ILR had changed, though they declined to clarify whether any new rules would apply retrospectively.
On Thursday (30), Badenoch ended the uncertainty. “No, we’re not. We’re not being retrospective,” she said. “The only way someone could lose their ILR is if they commit a crime – and that’s already the law. We have a principle: we don’t believe in making things retrospective.”
She added that the party’s planned withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) would allow the government to make future changes to benefits and immigration rules. “What we are trying to do is make sure all our policies are coherent and reflect changes like leaving the ECHR,” Badenoch said.
Clarifying Lam’s earlier statement, she said: “She just stated it imprecisely.”
The controversy has drawn sharp criticism from opposition parties. Max Wilkinson, the Liberal Democrats’ home affairs spokesperson, said: “Katie Lam’s divisive comments will have caused real distress to families worried about being torn apart. Kemi Badenoch should remove her from the Conservative front bench to show this is not official party policy.”
Labour also weighed in, writing to Badenoch to ask how the proposed ILR rules would work – particularly whether benefits such as maternity pay would be affected.
Badenoch dismissed that concern, saying: “Maternity leave is not a benefit. It’s an entitlement. It’s pay. What we have said is that people who come to our country should be contributors. They shouldn’t need to go on benefits.”
Lam’s earlier claim that ILR could be revoked for large numbers of people was condemned across the political spectrum.
Prime minister Keir Starmer said her words showed “how far the Conservative party has sunk”, while several Tory MPs privately criticised her remarks for fuelling confusion and anxiety among migrant families.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
Music
Hina Rizvi: “SongProof is giving artists back control of their music”
Shiveena Haque
24 October
Current Issue
×
Terms and Conditions
        By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
        partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
        Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
        unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
        relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
       Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
© Copyright 2025 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Asian Media Group USA Inc












