Gayathri Kallukaran is a Junior Journalist with Eastern Eye. She has a Master’s degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from St. Paul’s College, Bengaluru, and brings over five years of experience in content creation, including two years in digital journalism. She covers stories across culture, lifestyle, travel, health, and technology, with a creative yet fact-driven approach to reporting. Known for her sensitivity towards human interest narratives, Gayathri’s storytelling often aims to inform, inspire, and empower. Her journey began as a layout designer and reporter for her college’s daily newsletter, where she also contributed short films and editorial features. Since then, she has worked with platforms like FWD Media, Pepper Content, and Petrons.com, where several of her interviews and features have gained spotlight recognition. Fluent in English, Malayalam, Tamil, and Hindi, she writes in English and Malayalam, continuing to explore inclusive, people-focused storytelling in the digital space.
British actor Hugh Grant has publicly criticised a Heathrow Airport immigration officer after what he described as an inappropriate encounter involving his children. The incident took place on Friday, 4 April, as Grant travelled through the airport with his wife, Anna Elisabet Eberstein, and three of their children.
Grant, best known for his performances in films such as Notting Hill and Bridget Jones’s Diary, described the experience on X (formerly Twitter). He explained that although all members of his family had the surname “Grant” on their passports, an immigration officer engaged his children in casual conversation before whispering to them, “Are these your Mum and Dad?”
— (@)
The actor called the incident “intrusive, insulting and creepy”, expressing his disapproval of the manner in which the questioning took place. Grant was travelling with his three younger children, aged 12, nine and seven, whom he shares with Eberstein. He also has two older children, aged 13 and 12, with his former partner Tinglan Hong.
Grant, who is known for keeping his private life away from the spotlight, did not disclose where the family had been travelling to or from.
Immigration officers at Heathrow are not employed by the airport itself but by the UK Home Office as part of the Border Force. Their role includes conducting immigration and customs checks at airports across the country. According to official Home Office guidance, officers "may ask" travellers questions to confirm their relationship to accompanying children, especially if they have different surnames. The guidance specifies that such questioning should be carried out "in a way that is sensitive to the interests of the child and the adult involved."
It is standard procedure for Border Force officers to ensure the safeguarding of children by verifying parental relationships when necessary. However, Grant appeared to take issue not with the need for checks, but with the way in which the officer approached his children during the process.
Grant, who earlier this year received a BAFTA nomination for his role in the 2024 horror film Heretic, rarely comments publicly on his family matters. His remarks have since drawn attention online, with many expressing support for his concerns about the officer's approach.
At the time of writing, the Home Office has not issued a response to Grant’s criticism.
Protesters gather outside the Royal Courts of Justice in central London on October 13, 2025, as The High Court decides in a three-month trial whether systems installed in Mercedes, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Nissan diesel vehicles were designed to cheat clean air laws.
A MAJOR trial involving five global carmakers opened at London’s High Court on Monday, nearly ten years after the Volkswagen emissions scandal exposed the use of software designed to cheat pollution tests.
The court will determine in a three-month hearing whether systems installed in diesel vehicles made by Mercedes-Benz, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Nissan were designed to cheat clean air laws. The five manufacturers are accused of using illegal “defeat devices” that made cars appear less polluting during testing than they were on the road.
The case, one of the largest mass lawsuits in English legal history, involves 1.6 million motorists suing 14 carmakers, including Jaguar Land Rover, Toyota, Vauxhall-Opel and BMW. The current trial focuses on five lead defendants and is expected to set a precedent for other manufacturers, potentially paving the way for billions of pounds in compensation.
Martyn Day, lawyer at Leigh Day representing the claimants, said the case impacts “nearly all the manufacturers in this country.” He told AFP, “It is a huge case for the British public,” adding that it could lead to “serious amounts of compensation.”
Lawyers for the claimants say the devices detected when vehicles were being tested and ensured emissions were kept within legal limits, but did not do so in normal driving conditions. The five manufacturers deny the allegations and say their systems were legally and technically justified.
Mercedes and Ford have rejected the claims as having “no merit,” while Nissan declined to comment. French carmakers Renault and Stellantis, which owns Peugeot and Citroen, said their vehicles complied with regulations in place at the time.
The High Court’s decision will be binding on hundreds of thousands of similar claims against other manufacturers, including Vauxhall/Opel and BMW. Any damages the court might rule should be paid will be decided at a further trial next year.
Adam Kamenetzky, one of the claimants, said he felt “defrauded” after buying a Mercedes SUV in 2018 believing it was less polluting than other models. “We live in a built-up neighbourhood in London where there are children with lungs that can be harmed immeasurably by the emissions that these cars are producing,” he told AFP.
The dieselgate scandal first broke in 2015 when Volkswagen admitted fitting millions of vehicles with software to make engines appear less polluting in tests. The case triggered investigations and lawsuits against several major carmakers worldwide.
In 2020, the High Court found Volkswagen had used defeat devices to cheat emissions tests. The company settled the case in 2022, paying £193 million ($259 million) to 91,000 British motorists without admitting liability. Globally, Volkswagen has paid more than 32 billion euros ($37 billion) in fines, vehicle refits, and legal costs.
The latest group of claims in the UK, covering 14 manufacturers, is far larger than the VW case. Claimants’ lawyers have previously estimated the litigation’s total value at around £6 billion.
Courts and regulators around the world have since pursued investigations into diesel emissions. In July, a Dutch court ruled that diesel cars sold by Stellantis brands Opel, Peugeot-Citroen and DS contained defeat devices, a decision Stellantis said was wrong. Automakers have also faced fines and settlements in the United States and elsewhere.
Day said, “The vehicles looked less polluting during the testing, but as soon as you were outside the testing regime, those emission levels went massively up.”
The current UK trial will decide whether the carmakers are liable before any compensation phase begins next year.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.