Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among a group of pro-Palestinian campaigners on board a Gaza-bound aid vessel intercepted by Israeli forces and diverted to its shores, the country’s Foreign Ministry confirmed on 9 June.
The ship, Madleen, was organised by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, a group challenging Israel’s blockade of Gaza. It had departed Sicily on 1 June, carrying a dozen activists and a symbolic amount of humanitarian supplies.
Israeli military blocks flotilla’s progress
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the military was instructed to stop the vessel “by any means necessary”. The Foreign Ministry later confirmed the Madleen had been redirected to Israel and that its passengers would be repatriated.
In a social media post, the ministry dismissed the effort as a publicity stunt by “celebrities”, referring to it as the “‘selfie yacht’ of the ‘celebrities’”. It accused Thunberg and others of staging a “media provocation”. Footage released showed passengers in life jackets being offered sandwiches and water after interception.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition claimed it lost contact with the ship after alarms were triggered and drones were seen overhead. The group accused the Israeli military of “kidnapping” the activists. Surveillance footage appeared to show a vessel approaching and personnel boarding the Madleen.
Thunberg voices opposition to blockade
Greta Thunberg, known globally for her environmental activism, has been a strong critic of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Speaking last week, she said, “No matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying... it’s not even near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the live-streamed genocide.”
Israeli Defence Minister Gallant responded sharply, calling Thunberg “an antisemite” and warning that the ship would not be allowed to reach its destination. “Israel will act against any attempt to breach the blockade or aid terrorist organisations,” he said.
Small-scale aid onboard
The Madleen carried a limited quantity of humanitarian goods, including baby formula, flour, rice, medical supplies, children’s prosthetics, and diapers. The Israeli Foreign Ministry called the shipment “tiny”, adding it was “less than a single truckload of aid”.
Israel, along with Egypt, has maintained a blockade on Gaza since Hamas took control of the region in 2007. While Israeli officials say the measure is needed to prevent arms smuggling, rights groups argue it restricts essential goods and worsens the humanitarian crisis.
Repeat of earlier flotilla efforts
This is not the first attempt by activists to challenge the blockade. In 2010, a similar flotilla mission involving the Mavi Marmara ended in bloodshed when Israeli commandos boarded the ship, resulting in the deaths of nine people. A tenth person later died from injuries sustained during the raid.
Israel said its forces were attacked with clubs and knives during the operation. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition described it as “an unlawful and deadly attack”, saying the Madleen’s mission was “a continuation of that legacy”.
A separate mission earlier this year was also thwarted when a ship named Conscience, departing from Tunisia and en route to Malta, caught fire following explosions near the vessel. No injuries were reported, but the mission was called off.
Aid distribution remains contentious
In parallel with the flotilla controversy, Israel has promoted a new aid delivery mechanism via the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The group claims to have delivered over 1.1 million meals and 11 truckloads of food on 9 June across three distribution sites.
However, the initiative has faced criticism and has been boycotted by the UN and other major organisations. They accuse Israel of using humanitarian aid as a tool of control and allege that the new system sidelines independent oversight.
The foundation suspended operations temporarily on 8 June, citing threats from Hamas. A spokesperson claimed that local workers received warnings of “serious consequences” if they continued with the aid delivery programme.
Eight passengers were injured when a Ryanair flight from Berlin to Milan encountered severe turbulence and was forced to divert to an airport in southern Germany, Bavarian police have confirmed.
The incident occurred on Wednesday evening, with the aircraft landing at Memmingen Airport, west of Munich, at 8.44pm local time (6.44pm GMT). Among those injured were a two-year-old child who suffered bruising and a woman with a head injury. Police said three individuals were taken to hospital for further treatment, while others received medical attention at the airport.
According to police, the flight was unable to land at its intended destination of Munich Airport due to poor weather conditions. The turbulence prompted the flight captain to call ahead for medical assistance, and the aircraft landed safely without further incident.
A total of 179 passengers and six crew members were on board the flight. As a precaution, all passengers were checked for injuries. The ages of those injured ranged from two to 59 years.
Ryanair issued a statement apologising to passengers affected by the incident. The airline said: “This flight from Berlin to Milan (5 June) diverted to Memmingen after experiencing severe turbulence over Germany. The captain requested medical assistance ahead of landing, and the aircraft landed normally. Ryanair sincerely apologises to passengers affected by this diversion.”
Following the landing, the Southern Bavaria Aviation Authority did not approve an onward flight on Wednesday evening. Ryanair arranged alternative transport to Milan for passengers that night and provided a replacement flight the following morning.
The airline did not confirm the cause of the turbulence but weather-related issues were cited by local authorities. The situation was handled on site by emergency responders and local officials.
The incident comes as parts of central Europe have experienced unsettled weather conditions this week, including thunderstorms and heavy rainfall.
Despite the unexpected diversion and injuries, police noted that the aircraft landed safely and that all necessary medical protocols were followed.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Blatten, home to around 300 residents, had been evacuated on 19 May
A large section of glacier collapsed in the Swiss Alps on Wednesday, partially destroying the village of Blatten in the canton of Valais. Although the area had been evacuated several days earlier due to fears of glacial instability, one person has been reported missing, and extensive damage has been done to property.
The collapse of the Birch glacier triggered a massive avalanche of ice, mud and debris that swept through the valley. Drone footage captured the moment a huge section of the glacier broke away around 15:30 local time (14:30 BST), creating a deafening roar and leaving a dense cloud of dust in its wake.
Blatten, home to around 300 residents, had been evacuated on 19 May after geologists monitoring the glacier warned it was showing signs of imminent collapse. Despite the evacuation, the scale of the destruction is significant, with numerous homes flattened and the area left unrecognisable.
Mayor Matthias Bellwald described the event as “unimaginable” and emotionally stated: “We have lost our village, but not our heart. We will support each other and console each other. After a long night, it will be morning again.” He insisted that the community still had a future despite the devastation.
- YouTubeYouTube/ DisasterToday
The Swiss government has pledged support for the affected residents, promising funding to ensure they can remain in the region, even if not in Blatten itself. Local authorities have also requested assistance from the Swiss army’s disaster relief unit, while government officials are en route to the site to assess the situation.
Raphaël Mayoraz, head of the regional Office for Natural Hazards, warned that further evacuations in surrounding areas might be necessary due to the ongoing risk.
Local authorities have also requested assistance from the Swiss army’s disaster relief unitGetty Images
This latest incident underscores growing concerns about the impact of climate change in the Alps. Rising global temperatures are accelerating the melt of glaciers and thawing the permafrost, which helps stabilise mountain terrain. Scientists have warned that such changes are increasing the likelihood of landslides, avalanches, and flooding in alpine regions.
Blatten is not the first village to face such a threat. In 2023, residents of Brienz, also in eastern Switzerland, were evacuated after signs that the mountainside above was deteriorating. They have since only been allowed limited access to their homes.
In 2017, the village of Bondo experienced Switzerland’s largest landslide in more than a century, killing eight hikers and causing severe property damage.
Blatten is not the first village to face such a threatGetty Images
The latest report on Switzerland’s glaciers suggests that, unless global warming is limited to a 1.5°C rise above pre-industrial levels – the target set by the 2015 Paris climate agreement – the country’s glaciers could vanish entirely within the next hundred years.
Many climate scientists believe that the 1.5°C threshold has already been exceeded or is on track to be, meaning such disasters are likely to become more frequent.
Efforts are now focused on securing Blatten’s surroundings, accounting for missing persons, and planning long-term recovery for a village that, while scarred, is determined to endure.
Keep ReadingShow less
Regional impacts are also expected to vary significantly
There is an 80 per cent chance that the world will experience its hottest year on record within the next five years, according to a new report by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The findings underline the increasing likelihood of more severe droughts, floods and wildfires as global temperatures continue to rise.
The WMO's latest Global Annual to Decadal Climate Update shows that the Earth’s climate is warming at an accelerated pace. For the first time, the data suggests there is even a small chance – around 1 per cent – that the global average temperature could temporarily exceed 2°C above preindustrial levels before 2030. Scientists described this possibility as “shocking”, given that it had previously been considered impossible within such a short timeframe.
The report, which combines short-term meteorological data with long-term climate model projections, estimates a 70 per cent likelihood that the five-year average global temperature between 2025 and 2029 will exceed 1.5°C above preindustrial levels. That threshold is a key target of the 2015 Paris Agreement, which aims to limit long-term global warming to well below 2°C, ideally keeping it under 1.5°C.
An 86 per cent probability was also reported that the 1.5°C mark will be surpassed in at least one year between now and 2029, a sharp rise from the 40 per cent likelihood outlined in the 2020 update. Notably, 2024 has already breached this threshold on an annual basis for the first time – an outcome previously thought highly unlikely before 2014. The year 2023 remains the hottest ever recorded since observations began 175 years ago.
The increasing frequency of record-breaking temperatures reflects the growing influence of climate change, exacerbated by ongoing greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels. The WMO report draws on data from 220 climate model simulations contributed by 15 global research institutions, including the UK Met Office, Barcelona Supercomputing Centre, the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, and Deutscher Wetterdienst in Germany.
Although the chances of hitting 2°C within the next five years remain low, scientists warn that the probability is rising as the planet warms. According to Dr Adam Scaife of the Met Office, “It is shocking that 2°C is plausible. It has come out as only 1 per cent in the next five years, but the probability will increase as the climate warms.”
Regional impacts are also expected to vary significantly. Arctic winters are projected to warm 3.5 times faster than the global average, largely due to declining sea ice, which reduces the Earth’s ability to reflect sunlight. Meanwhile, the Amazon rainforest faces increased risk of drought, and rainfall is expected to intensify across South Asia, the Sahel and northern Europe, including the UK.
Leon Hermanson of the Met Office, who led the production of the update, said that 2025 is likely to be one of the three hottest years ever recorded. He highlighted that the rising temperatures carry significant risks for ecosystems, economies and human health.
Chris Hewitt, director of climate services at the WMO, described the findings as painting a “worrying picture” for global heatwaves and health outcomes. However, he emphasised that immediate action could still make a difference. “We must take climate action,” he said. “1.5°C is not inevitable.”
The WMO continues to urge governments and industries to cut emissions and accelerate the transition to renewable energy in order to limit further warming and avoid the most severe consequences of climate change.
Keep ReadingShow less
Shahzada Dawood (R) with his son Suleman Dawood (Courtesy: Engro Corporation Limited/via REUTERS)
NEW video footage from the support vessel has exposed the exact instant OceanGate's Titan submersible was destroyed.
It imploded roughly an hour and a half into its journey to the Titanic wreckage in June 2023, resulting in the deaths of all five passengers.
Footage shows the wife of OceanGate's chief executive hearing the moment their deep-sea vessel collapsed underwater, killing her husband and four others.
Broadcaster BBC gained exclusive behind-the-scenes access to the American Coast Guard's inquiry to create their film, Implosion: The Titanic Sub Disaster. According to reports, the investigation team have spent two years examining the tragedy.
Wendy Rush was sitting aboard the support vessel when she heard a loud bang and asked crew members: "What was that bang?"
The sound was actually her husband Stockton Rush's submersible imploding as it descended towards the Titanic wreck.
Rush, British adventurer Hamish Harding, experienced French diver Paul Henri Nargeolet, and British-Pakistani father and son Shahzada and Suleman Dawood, were killed in the accident. All had paid significant sums to visit the famous shipwreck lying nearly 4,000 metres beneath the Atlantic Ocean.
Coast Guard officials now reveal the vessel's fatal flaw began developing a full year before the deadly trip. During an earlier dive - the craft's 80th journey - passengers reported hearing a worrying bang as they returned to the surface.
At the time, Rush dismissed the noise as the submarine moving within its frame. However, investigators say sensor data proves this was actually the carbon fibre hull beginning to separate - a dangerous process called delamination.
"Delamination at dive 80 was the beginning of the end," explained Lieutenant Commander Katie Williams from the Coast Guard. "Everyone that stepped onboard the Titan after dive 80 was risking their life."
Despite this warning sign, the company continued operating. Three more trips took place in summer 2022 before the fatal voyage the following year.
The submarine's construction had long worried deep-sea experts. Unlike traditional vessels made from steel or titanium, Titan used layers of carbon fibre mixed with resin - an unconventional choice that many considered risky for extreme depths.
One expert called the design an "abomination" and said the disaster was "inevitable". The craft had never passed independent safety checks.
Businessman Oisin Fanning, who travelled on Titan's final two successful dives, told the BBC, "If you're asking a simple question: 'Would I go again knowing what I know now?' - the answer is no. Very intelligent people who lost their lives would not have made that journey had they had all the facts."
Deep-sea explorer Victor Vescovo said he had warned people against using the vessel, comparing it to "playing Russian roulette". He claimed he told Mr Rush directly that catastrophic failure was inevitable.
Christine Dawood, who lost both her husband and teenage son, told documentary makers: "I don't think that anybody who goes through loss and such a trauma can ever be the same."
The Coast Guard will publish their final investigation report later this year. OceanGate has since shut down permanently and said it would be "inappropriate to respond further" while investigations continue.
Keep ReadingShow less
Kim called the warship a “breakthrough” in the country’s naval forces
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, expressed his fury after witnessing a major accident during the launch of the latest North Korean warship, on Thursday. Kim considers this malfunction in the mechanism of the warship as a shame to the nation’s prestige.
As per Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), parts of the 5,000 ton destroyer’s bottom was damaged, and went off-balance as it eased into water during the launch. Parts of the destroyer’s hull was crushed, leaving the bow stranded on the shipway.
No casualties or injuries were reported after the incident.
The mishap took place in Kim’s presence, along with a large crowd from northeastern part of Chongjin, which added to his humiliation. He commented the accident as “criminal act”, and “carelessness”, from those in charge. He declared that those involved with the error will be held responsible and punished.
Multiple state institutions are considered responsible the accident – including the Munitions Industry Department, Kim Chaek University of Technology and the central ship design bureau.
Yang Wuk, an Asan Institute for Policy Studies military expert commented on the failed launch of the warship, embarrassing for the country.
According to a South Korean military analysis, the damaged warship is on their side in the water. The South Korean military spokesperson, Lee said that he expected the damaged destroyer to be equipped like the Choe Hyon.
“If the ship does not move together, the stresses will tear the hull apart,” said Sal Mercogliano, Professor at Campbell University and a maritime expert.
North Korea lacks floating docks usually found in shipbuilding states. Therefore, "Pushing from the side is the most basic, simplest and cheapest, if done right,” said Chol Il, retired South Korean submarine commander.
Kim called the warship a “breakthrough” in the country’s naval forces. Therefore, he ordered for the destroyer to be restored before the late June plenary session of the ruling Worker’s Party.