Tarun Khanna has been a familiar face on Indian television for two decades now. He made his first big television splash as Sameer in Star Plus’ Kabhi Aaye Na Judaai (2001-2003). The actor then went on to play a variety of characters in several successful shows.
He is also known for playing Lord Shiva in more than half-a-dozen mythological shows, including Karmaphal Daata Shani (2016-2018), Paramavatar Shri Krishna (2017-2020), and RadhaKrishn (2018-present).
“I think it is a privilege to get into that costume. Every time I do it, I thank God that I am doing that role,” Khanna told Eastern Eye when we caught up with him on the sets of his upcoming web-show Geisha.
In this interview, Tarun Khanna spoke with us about his new show Geisha, what he would not like to remember about 2020, the mediocrity of television content, why he has no plans of quitting television despite its content losing its shine day by day, and much more.
How was 2020 for you?
I did not shoot for three months. I last shot on 18th March and resumed shooting on 22nd June, 2020. So, I did not shoot for three months and four days, to be more precise, which was actually a welcome break. I got a lot of time to spend with my family. My son recently turned 7 and it was the first time when I spent full three months with him. It was heaven for me.
What would you not like to remember about 2020?
I am unhappy with the way things have been handled. The government screwed up everything. It was not helping people out. People did not get their salaries for three months or so. And when organisations finally started paying their employees, there was a 50% cut in salaries. What did our government do about it? Was there any reduction in rent during such unprecedented times? Did the government step in and made it necessary for all landlords to slash their rent by 50%? Did it bring petrol prices down by 50%? So, what did our government do? There was a time when I was very much in favour of our government. But now, I have realised that it is just taking care of its vested interests, and I am not at all happy.
Tell us something about your upcoming show Geisha?
A new streaming media platform called Digiflix is coming up very soon. Geisha will premiere on that platform. I think the team is planning to launch the platform in April, and they are creating a bank of around 9 shows. They have already produced two shows; Geisha is third in the line. The makers are very new, but they are working very professionally. I do not feel that I am working with new people.
What are you playing in Geisha?
Geisha is a thriller where I am playing a cop, who is investigating a case, which is the crux of the story. My character name is Rajveer Shekhawat. He is a 40-year-old unmarried cop. He has no shortcomings as such, but he is not married. He is frustrated because of the same and his frustration leads to a number of comic situations as well.
Even after playing a variety of characters on television, the audience mostly remembers you for your mythological roles. Do you feel that television stereotypes actors easily?
Yes, of course. The level of mediocrity that you find on Indian television is something that you do not find anywhere else in the world. Indian television is more mediocre than our government. I am amazed at the mediocrity of Indian television shows. I have one question for all creative directors that what are you guys doing? I am not saying that the entire industry is like that. There are some good people as well.
What do you hate most about TV?
The stupidest thing that you can notice in Indian shows is that only the male and female leads are born with brains and the rest of the cast is shown as a brainless and senseless lot. If the police have arrived to investigate something, they will talk only to the bahu who is the protagonist. The rest of the family members will keep standing around her, looking nonplussed. I ask you where does this happen? This can happen only on Indian television. I wonder how our innocent audience falls prey to such content. They perhaps do not know the makers are building bungalows after bungalows by churning out such crap shows. I feel why the producers who have loads of money and power cannot make something good. I am happy to see them grow and build new bungalows, but is it not their responsibility to make at least a few good shows that they can feel proud of?
Do you think that streaming media is going to pose a serious threat to television?
Television is already on its deathbed. Budgets for television shows have been slashed. Trust me, TV will become redundant in five years. The way streaming media platforms are expanding their market, television is bound to shut up its shop sooner or later. It’s a do-or-die situation for television. The makers will have to wake up and smell the coffee. If they do not act now and improve their content quality, nobody can stop their fall. They are making such crap shows I cannot tell you.
Is there no silver lining?
There are some makers who do try to make good shows and stand out from the crowd. For example, Tony Singh and Divya Singh of DJ’s Creative Unit. In 2003, they produced a show called Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahi which kind of revolutionised the entire content landscape on Indian television. People tried to replicate its success but no show could create the kind of impact Jassi… did. The makers reason that they make what the audience likes to watch. I am of the opinion that if you do not make good shows, how can the audience’s taste improve. They do not have great shows to choose from.
Streaming media is the way forward, according to you.
The only issue I find with OTT platforms is that they rely too much on flop film actors. They should know for a fact that the audience rejected them in films for a reason. How can their magic work in streaming shows if it failed to do any wonder in films? If they were so talented, why did not their charm work on the silver screen? Actors who failed in films are joining OTT in a big way. Another issue, according to me, is casting directors casting themselves in shows. At times, casting is completely wrong and misfit. A girl who cannot even act was playing a superstar in a high-profile show I watched some time ago.
Is there any actor who really impressed you in a web show?
Pankaj Tripathi and Ali Fazal. Ali Fazal is a powerhouse of talent. He is a very good actor who can give several so-called superstars a run for their money. They cannot even stand before him. He is at that level. That boy has got serious talent. The same goes for Pankaj Tripathi. He is a household name today. He is modern-day’s Naseeruddin Shah.
Is television going to take a backseat for you?
No, not at all! My kitchen still runs from RadhaKrishn which I do on Star Bharat. To play the role of Lord Shiva is a privilege. He is the God of Gods.
Let me tell you an interesting story. There was this big-ticket show on Lord Shiva which I had auditioned for. I did not get the part, the other guy who auditioned with me did. Later, I was cast to play Ravan in that very show. I played the part with full honesty. However, I would always think why did not I get to play Shiva? Where did I lack? Later, I realised it was God’s plan that I played Ravan. I changed the way people would normally look at the character of Ravan before. Earlier, there was this perception that Ravan should look like a devil with a paunch and all. I was the first actor to play Ravan who did not look like a proverbial demon. Then they got the idea that good-looking actors can also play a villain like Ravan convincingly. You just have to paste a moustache. After that, I went on to play Shiva on eight television shows. I think it is a privilege to get into that costume. Every time I do it, I thank God that I am doing that role. I will never say no to television.
There’s no question who ruled the night at the 2025 BET Awards. Kendrick Lamar walked away with five trophies, including Album of the Year for GNX and Video of the Year for Not Like Us. The ceremony, held at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles, paid tribute to Black excellence in music, acting, and sports, and Kendrick made sure his voice and message were front and centre.
Kendrick Lamar accepts Best Album for GNX at the BET Awards in Los AngelesGetty Images
Lamar, Doechii, and a moment that mattered
The GNX rapper also won Best Male Hip-Hop Artist and shared the Video Director of the Year award with Dave Free. Accepting his award, Lamar reflected on his long-standing relationship with BET, saying, “They’ve always kept the culture at the core and put me in the middle of it.”
— (@)
Rising rapper Doechii also made headlines, not just for winning Best Female Hip-Hop Artist but for calling out former US President Donald Trump. In a fiery speech, she criticised the use of military force to break up protests in LA following ICE raids in Latino communities. “Every time we stand up for our rights, the military is sent in. What kind of leadership is that?” she asked the crowd.
A night of icons and throwbacks
The night wasn’t just about current stars. The BET Ultimate Icon Award honoured Mariah Carey, Snoop Dogg, Jamie Foxx, and gospel star Kirk Franklin for their decades of influence in music, entertainment, and community action. Stevie Wonder presented Foxx’s award as he opened up about his recovery from a 2023 stroke. “When I saw the ‘In Memoriam’ segment, I thought that could’ve been me,” he said.
Mariah Carey celebrates her Ultimate Icon Award with a rare live performanceGetty Images
Mariah Carey, presented her award by Busta Rhymes, lit up the stage with a brief but heartfelt speech. “If you're going to win one of these, it might as well be the Ultimate Icon,” she joked, hinting at the ups and downs of her legendary career.
With Lamar and SZA heading back on tour and voices like Doechii’s rising louder, the 2025 BET Awards proved it is a stage for change.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Harris Dickinson debuts as Rhode’s first male model in new Glazing Mist campaign
Rhode, Hailey Bieber’s rapidly growing skincare label, has chosen Babygirl actor Harris Dickinson as the face of its new product, the Glazing Mist. Known for his understated performances and growing fashion presence, Dickinson is the first male model to front a campaign for the brand. The new mist, priced at £24 (₹2,520), goes live on 24 June exclusively at rhodeskin.com.
A surprising choice that feels just right
The campaign, shot in stark black-and-white, features close-up visuals of Dickinson misting his face with the Glazing Mist, designed to refresh skin and deliver a natural glow. With ingredients like ectoin, ceramides, and magnolia extract, the formula offers both hydration and barrier support. It has also earned a stamp of approval from the National Eczema Association.
Hailey Bieber explained her choice simply: she watched Babygirl, loved Dickinson’s performance, and sensed he could bring the kind of quiet edge she wanted. “I didn’t want it to feel too ‘on-the-nose’ with the film,” she said. “It had to be chic and sporty.” The internet, however, couldn’t resist the connection to Dickinson’s now-infamous milk scene in the film, and fans were quick to point out how the dewy mist echoed that very vibe.
Rhode expands, without changing its DNA
Since its 2022 launch, Rhode has stood out for sleek, limited product drops and a focused digital presence. Its recent £790 million (₹82,950 crore) acquisition by e.l.f. Beauty has only amplified interest in where the brand goes next. While introducing a male face might suggest a shift, Bieber was clear: this isn’t about launching a men’s line but widening the brand’s appeal. “I want everyone to see themselves in Rhode,” she said.
Dickinson’s inclusion reflects a subtle repositioning. Best known for roles in Beach Rats, Triangle of Sadness, and now Babygirl, he has also been a regular in fashion, working with Dior and Loewe.
With this campaign, Rhode continues to evolve clearly, without losing the minimalist identity that made it stand out in the first place.
Keep ReadingShow less
HBO’s Harry Potter reboot slammed for casting Italian actress as Indian character Parvati Patil
HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter reboot is already under fire, this time for casting Italian actress Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, a character rooted in Indian culture. The announcement has triggered widespread backlash from fans who accuse the makers of side-lining authentic South Asian representation in favour of what many see as surface-level diversity.
Parvati, originally portrayed by Shefali Chowdhury in the films, is one of the few explicitly Indian characters in the Harry Potter universe. The decision to cast someone with no clear Indian heritage has led to heated discussions across platforms like Reddit and X, with fans calling out what they perceive as performative inclusivity.
Fans question why Indian talent was overlooked again
Many online comments have shared similar frustrations: that casting a brown-skinned actor is not the same as casting someone of Indian origin. “They just picked someone who looks brown and called it a day,” one Redditor commented. Another added, “Parvati is not just a name, it’s a direct reference to Hindu culture. It deserved more thought.”
This is not the first controversy to hit the reboot. Earlier announcements like casting Paapa Essiedu as Snape and Arabella Stanton as Hermione also drew criticism from those who felt the series was playing fast and loose with established character identities. Supporters of accurate representation argue that while the intent may be diversity, the execution often feels tokenistic.
— (@)
Adding fuel to the fire is the casting history of the original films, where British-Bangladeshi actors Shefali Chowdhury and Afshan Azad played the Patil twins after being discovered through grassroots-level auditions. That sense of grounded authenticity, fans argue, is missing in the current reboot.
HBO's broader casting choices also under scrutiny
Alongside Leoni, HBO announced several other cast members: Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley, Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy, Johnny Flynn as Lucius Malfoy, Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown, Bel Powley and Daniel Rigby as the Dursleys, and Bertie Carvel as Cornelius Fudge.
— (@)
The series, hoped to be a faithful adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s books, is scheduled to premiere in 2026. But with these early casting calls, many longtime fans feel HBO is missing the mark on cultural nuance—and all this before a single spell has been cast on screen.
The tense deliberations in Harvey Weinstein’s New York sex crimes retrial have descended into open conflict. Jurors are reportedly attacking each other, pressuring hold-outs, and improperly considering the disgraced movie mogul’s notorious past, information explicitly banned from their discussions. This internal strife forced the jury foreperson to urgently alert the judge on Monday morning about a “situation which isn’t very good”, casting serious doubt on their ability to reach a fair verdict.
Infighting and forbidden arguments taint deliberations
According to a court transcript, the foreperson painted a grim picture for Judge Curtis Farber. Jurors are “not on the same page”, with some actively “attacking” others in a bid to change minds. Crucially, they are “pushing people” by bringing up Weinstein’s public history, details not presented as evidence during this specific trial.
As per reports, Jurors are in a heated debate during Weinstein retrial deliberationsGetty Images
This is similar to the earlier “playground stuff” reported last week, where one young juror felt unfairly “shunned” and questioned the fairness of the process, though the judge kept him on the panel. The jury itself signalled deep divisions, requesting a reread of “reasonable doubt” rules and guidance on “avoiding a hung jury”.
Mistrial denied, but jury reminded “Stick to the evidence”
Weinstein’s lawyers, citing a “tainted” and “runaway jury”, immediately seized on the turmoil to demand a mistrial. Defence attorney Arthur Aidala argued jurors were “ganging up” and considering “things that were not brought into this trial”. Prosecutors countered that some past context was legally permissible. Judge Farber denied the mistrial but took swift action. He hauled the entire jury back in, sternly instructing them that deliberations must focus only on evidence presented during the retrial concerning the three specific charges, including rape and criminal sex acts involving three women. He reiterated they must disregard anything else they knew about Weinstein.
Weinstein jury divided by heated disputes over forbidden pastGetty Images
The jury ended Monday claiming they were “making progress”, even asking for coffee to fuel further talks and requesting to revisit some testimony. However, the damage from the infighting and forbidden discussions lingers.
Weinstein, 73, already serving a long sentence for a separate California rape conviction, awaits this jury’s verdict on charges stemming from allegations by a former production assistant, an aspiring actress, and a model. This retrial, ordered after his landmark 2020 New York conviction was overturned, remains a critical, though now deeply troubled, chapter in the #MeToo saga he set to fire.
Keep ReadingShow less
Charli XCX celebrates a year of Brat’s cultural takeover
It’s been a full year since Charli XCX dropped Brat, and the album’s neon-green grip on pop culture has not loosened. Forget fading summer anthems; Brat feels permanently wired into the now. How did an artist long celebrated for being ahead of the curve finally make the whole world tune in? Well, she did it entirely her own way.
Charli was no newcomer. She smashed charts a decade ago with “Fancy” and penned hits for others. Yet mainstream stardom on her own terms felt elusive until Brat. The rollout was masterful, starting with the divisive “Von Dutch”, then the It Girl-packed “360” video featuring faces like Julia Fox and Chloë Sevigny, who soon became unavoidable.
Charli XCX arrives for the 2025 Met GalaGetty Images
Crucially, she nurtured her core fans (“Angels”) with intimate pop-up shows, birthing the iconic Brat Wall, where teasers about collaborations and the deluxe album kept excitement boiling. When Brat landed, hitting No. 3 in the US and No. 2 in the UK, it was a moment of absolute cultural takeover.
Beyond the music: building a movement
Brat’s fire spread far beyond the songs. A simple tweet : “Kamala IS brat”, saw the US Vice President’s campaign adopt the album’s aesthetic overnight, sparking global chatter. Charli directly addressed fan speculation, confirming “Girl, So Confusing” was about Lorde, then brilliantly working it out with her on a remix weeks later. She refused to let the moment die, dropping a full remix album (Brat and It’s the Same but There’s Three More Songs so It’s Not), featuring everyone from Billie Eilish to underground stars, which pushed Brat to UK No. 1.
Charli XCX performing on stage Getty Images
The Sweat and Brat tours became must-see events, packed with surprise guests. Grammy wins followed, plus SNL, Coachella and film cameos. Even her older song “Party 4 U” surged up the charts years later. Charli questioned at Coachella: “Does this mean brat summer is finally over?” The answer seems clear. Brat wasn’t just a seasonal hit. It was almost like Charli XCX meticulously crafting a phenomenon, proving that staying fiercely true to her vision was the ultimate key to connect with a wide audience.