Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Doctor tore down trellis in ‘fit of rage’ after row with neighbours, court hears

Veena Paes is engaged in a legal battle with three sets of neighbours residing in her suburban street in Trevelyan Road, Tooting, South London

Doctor tore down trellis in ‘fit of rage’ after row with neighbours, court hears

In a court hearing, it was revealed that a doctor, Dr Veena Paes, who is engaged in a bitter dispute with her neighbours over the ownership of a strip of land near their houses, tore down a trellis “in a fit of rage.”

Dr Paes, a specialist in public health research, is engaged in a legal battle with three sets of neighbours residing in her suburban street in Trevelyan Road, Tooting, South London.


The neighbours in question, namely Thomas and Florence Benton, Robert Gilder and Althea D'Lima, and Mohammed Shaffi, own three corner plot properties adjacent to Dr Paes' £1 million home.

Dr Paes claims that her neighbours "colluded to trespass" on the strip of land that separates all four properties.

Dr Paes, along with her husband, Melanius Paes, alleges a conspiracy by the neighbours to seize their land, The Telegraph reported.

They argue that a gate, which used to provide access to the 84ft x 20ft strip, was removed, and new fencing was erected, wrongfully blocking their entry.

The couple conducted extensive historical research into house deeds and documents dating back to Victorian times, supporting their claim of ownership.

The conflicting claims of ownership and the potential application of adverse possession are at the center of the case, which is being heard at the Central London County Court.

Dr Paes has voiced complaints about encroachment since seven years when one of her previous neighbours erected a fence in the wrong place. Furthermore, the removal of a gate that once allowed access to the strip added to the tensions.

During the court proceedings, testimonies were presented by both parties.

Dr Paes argued that she and her husband have faced harassment, while her neighbours denied any conspiracy or intentional land seizure.

Seeking a court order in their favour to establish the boundary and an injunction related to the structures on the disputed land, Dr Paes and her husband presented their case.

After four days of court hearings, the judge, Recorder Green, reserved judgment, indicating that the final decision is yet to be made.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Donald Trump

The US has refunded $81 billion in tariff payments after a Supreme Court ruling struck down part of Donald Trump's trade policy

Getty Images

Trump's tariff strategy takes a hit as US refunds $81bn to importers

  • The US has refunded $81 billion in tariffs after a Supreme Court ruling invalidated part of Donald Trump's trade measures.
  • Most repayments were made in May and June, according to Treasury figures.
  • The White House is still preparing a fresh round of tariffs targeting several trading partners.

The US government has refunded $81 billion (£61 billion) in tariff payments after the Supreme Court struck down a significant part of President Donald Trump's trade policy, reversing one of the administration's biggest revenue-raising measures.

The tariff refunds were disclosed in new US budget figures covering the fiscal year that began in October 2025. During the same period a year earlier, the government repaid just $5 billion in tariffs, highlighting the scale of the court-ordered repayments.

Keep ReadingShow less