Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Debate continues over trans woman heading Scotland's rape crisis center

Debate continues over trans woman heading Scotland's rape crisis center

APPOINTMENT of a transgender woman as the head of a rape crisis centre in Scotland has triggered a debate on inclusiveness.

Mridul Wadhwa, a former Holyrood SNP candidate, has been recently made chief executive of Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC). However, the appointment is not taken well by some feminists saying that the role is reserved only for women-only candidates and Wadha has no gender recognition certificate and has not undergone gender reassignment surgery.


Wadhwa was previously with the Forth Valley Rape Crisis Centre, Rape Crisis Scotland and Shakti Women’s Aid.

Standing for Women’s activist Kellie-Jay Keen said that women had opened the Edinburgh centre in 1978 and she doubts if they “ever thought that their tireless campaigning would provide a seat for a male CEO.”

"Surely this role should have been explicitly women-only,” she said.

Wadhwa’s hiring has triggered a debate on social media as well. While some feminists are urging the Equality and Human Rights Commission to investigate the matter, many netizens are also coming out in support of Wadhwa.

“Heartbreaking, and dreadful. Trans women are women, and are at extreme risk of sexual violence,” tweeted writer Laura J. Mixon.

Meanwhile, ERCC Scotland has said that they are “proud” to have Wadhwa “as a colleague."

Sandy Brindley, the chief executive, said: “Mridul Wadhwa brings to this role extensive experience working in the violence against women sector. All rape crisis centres in Scotland work within equality and employment law. 

There is a lot of misinformation and targeted harassment in relation to Mridul. We think this is unacceptable.”

Another controversy erupted last year in October when Wadhwa was put forward as a candidate to contest the Stirling seat at this year’s Holyrood election. She reportedly left the party in December after MSPs overwhelmingly backed an amendment in Holyrood to allow survivors of rape and sexual assaults to pick the sex rather than the gender of the person examining them. 

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Meta

A landmark ruling places child safety at the centre of the debate over social media accountability

Getty Images

US court hits Meta with another £421m over child safety failures, labels firm a ‘public nuisance’

  • Meta's total penalty in the New Mexico case has reached £700 million ($942 million).
  • A US judge likened the company's platforms to a factory creating public harm through its recommendation systems.
  • The ruling also orders sweeping changes to how Instagram and Facebook operate for users under 18.

Meta has been hit with another major legal setback after a judge in the US state of New Mexico ordered the company to pay £421 million ($567 million) over claims that its platforms failed to protect children from online harm. The latest order takes the company's total penalty in the case to £700 million ($942 million), making it the biggest financial punishment Meta has faced over child safety.

The case is drawing attention well beyond New Mexico because the court went a step further than simply imposing a fine. Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled that Meta's platforms amounted to a "public nuisance", comparing the company to a factory whose main product is advertising while the "pollution" is the psychological harm and sexual exploitation suffered by children, as quoted in a news report.

Keep ReadingShow less