Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Caste in US politics

By Amit Roy

IT IS easy to sympathise with the Pulitzer prize­winning American jour­nalist, Isabel Wilkinson, who has drawn lessons for the US from her per­sonal experiences out­lined in her book, Caste: The Lies That Divide Us (Allen Lane, £20).


On one occasion, when she went to interview a shop owner in Chicago’s Magnificent Mile, the city’s premier commer­cial district, she was told to leave because he was “preparing for an impor­tant appointment with The New York Times”.

This anecdote reminds me of a black colleague whom I won’t name but we sat opposite each oth­er for a number of years. On one occasion he, too, went to interview some­one who rang the office after waiting for a while to complain: “There’s no one here.” All the while, the reporter was standing next to him.

After the Black Lives Matter movement be­came active again in America following the killing of George Floyd, I did wonder whether the race divisions in the country were so deep that the only solution was a partition of the US to create a separate land for African Americans.

Although this is a little far-fetched, Wilkinson has likened the cracks in American society to the caste divisions in India: “Caste is more than rank, it is a state of mind that holds everyone captive, the dominant imprisoned in an illusion of their own entitlement, the subordi­nate trapped in the pur­gatory of someone else’s definition of who they should be.”

More For You

tech grok

Musk – the world’s richest man – wants to be the greatest global influencer too: a Citizen Kane for our age. (Photo credit: Getty Images)

Why Britain must make social media lawful again

THIS must be a “tipping point” for the rule of law online, technology secretary Liz Kendall told the House of Commons earlier this week. X owner Elon Musk’s Grok AI tool helped that site’s users make sexist harassment the viral new year trend of 2026. Politicians across the world declared it was “appalling” and “unacceptable”. The challenge is to turn that declaratory rhetoric into action. Britain’s media regulator Ofcom will open a formal investigation.

The controversy has illuminated again how US billionaire businessman Musk takes a “pick and mix” approach as to which laws he thinks should apply to him and his companies. Even libertarian site owners tend to recognise some responsibility to remove child sexual abuse. But Musk was laughing about the nudification trend. He is contemptuous about laws curbing hate crime and the incitement of violence, saying they are signs Britain has a “fascist” government which must be overthrown. What is vital is that our government and regulators do not risk emulating Musk’s “pick and mix” approach to when unlawful content really matters. Ofcom states it will not “hesitate to investigate” when it suspects companies are failing in their duties “especially where there’s a risk of harm to children”. This will be a popular public priority. Ofcom must this year show parliamentarians and the public that it can find the bandwidth and capacity to insist on sites meeting all of their legal duties.

Keep ReadingShow less