Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Why Bristol statue honours Rammohun Roy’s liberal values

Why Bristol statue honours Rammohun Roy’s liberal values

by SHALINA PATEL 

STATUES of south Asians are a rare sight in Britain today, so when I came across one outside Bristol Cathedral (pre Covid), I had to find out more.


Raja Rammohun Roy was born in India in 1772, and his extensive education led him to grasp many languages, includ­ing Sanskrit, English, Persian, Arabic, Latin and Greek.

One of his first lines of work was in the East India Company (EIC), where he became inter­ested in how much revenue generated by the EIC was actually being invested back into India.

He believed it was important to Indian progress if people em­braced a blend of Indian and ‘Western’ customs, as well as taking a clear stand against cus­toms he saw as oppressive. Roy was a supporter of women’s rights; for example, speaking out against sati (his sister-in-law had died due to this practice of self-immolation of widows at their husband’s funeral pyres in 1811), polygamy and child mar­riage. He also advocated for re­form of the caste system, which was something the British were able to laud over Indian society as an example of their moral ‘superiority’. He founded the Brahmo Samaj in 1828 to sup­port his work on social reform.

Roy understood that educa­tion was key in order to achieve real change, and set up schools and colleges that offered a com­bination of both Indian and Western scholarship.

He also recognised that get­ting public support for his ideas was integral. He launched a weekly Bengali newspaper called Sambad Kaumudi which he used to promote his cam­paign against sati. His publica­tions were certainly influential, with the governor-general Lord William Bentinck prohibiting the practice in 1829.

So why is there a statue of him in Bristol? Roy travelled to England in 1830 on behalf of the Mughal emperor Akbar, who lat­er gave him the title of ‘Raja.’ Roy had also heard rumours that the banning of sati might be overturned, so he wished to appeal directly to the govern­ment about this. Roy was per­haps one of the first ‘Indian in­tellectuals’ to sail to Europe. We know Roy visited Manchester, Liverpool and London during his time in Britain and that he met King William IV and philos­ophers like Jeremy Bentham.

In 1833, Roy died in Bristol after contracting meningitis, and was buried in the city’s Ar­nos Vale Cemetery. There is a street named after him too. His tomb was designed to reflect traditional Bengali chattris, and his statue was unveiled in 1997.

Roy’s liberal views were con­troversial at the time, particularly that the Indian education system should incorporate Western practices. Mahatma Gandhi, for example, was not a supporter of his views, while others like Go­pal Krishna Gohkale have re­ferred to Roy as the ‘father of modern India.’

Shalina Patel 1 Shalina Patel

Shalina Patel is the head of teaching and learning in a large comprehensive school in north-west London. Patel runs the History Corridor on Instagram, which has more than 15,000 followers and showcases the diverse history that she teaches. She has delivered training to more than 200 school leaders since July 2020 on decolonising the curriculum. Patel won the Pearson Silver Teaching Award 2018 for Teacher of the Year in a Secondary School.

More For You

Court representational

David Lammy’s call to reduce the number of jury trials is not an attack on democracy; it is a long-overdue recognition of reality.

iStock

Jury trials are failing Britain - it’s time for real reform

Last week the Justice Secretary, David Lammy, proposed cutting down on jury trials. His suggestion may be controversial, but it is rooted in an uncomfortable truth: the current system is no longer fit for purpose.

As a former lay magistrate, I have seen the cracks in Britain’s justice system widening year after year. What the public is often told about the sanctity of jury service and the noble tradition of the magistracy bears little resemblance to the reality inside the courtroom. The truth is starker: our reliance on laypeople - however well-meaning - to deliver justice is no longer workable. We must remember that when the concept of jury trials was embedded in our legal system by Henry II in the 12th century, the population of Britain was a mere 2 million. Today – with a population of over 65 million – the principle of being tried by your peers is time-consuming, difficult to administer, and ridiculously expensive.

Keep ReadingShow less